Dimitris K. Agrafiotis

Dimitris K. Agrafiotis

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Dimitris K. Agrafiotis

Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C., Welsh & McKean Roads, Spring House, Pennsylvania 19477, United States

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

40Years (1987-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2020 in Chemical Society Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EMEugene Muratov
Eugene Muratov
Jürgen BajorathJürgen Bajorath
Jürgen Bajorath
RSRobert P. Sheridan
Robert P. Sheridan
Igor V. TetkoIgor V. Tetko
Igor V. Tetko
DFDmitry Filimonov
Dmitry Filimonov
ATAlexander Tropsha
Alexander Tropsha
Word cloud summary of diverse topics associated with QSAR modeling that are discussed in this review.

6 April 2012 in Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TSThomas Scior
Thomas Scior
ABAndreas Bender
Andreas Bender
GTGary Tresadern
Gary Tresadern
JMJosé L. Medina-Franco
José L. Medina-Franco
KMKarina Martínez-Mayorga
Karina Martínez-Mayorga
DADimitris K. Agrafiotis
Dimitris K. Agrafiotis

16 December 2009 in Journal of Computational Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PLPu Liu
Pu Liu
DADimitris K. Agrafiotis
Dimitris K. Agrafiotis
DTDouglas L. Theobald
Douglas L. Theobald
Finding the rotational matrix that minimizes the sum of squared deviations between two vectors is an important problem in bioinformatics and crystallography. Traditional algorithms involve the inversion or decomposition of a 3 × 3 or 4 × 4 matrix, which can be computationally expensive and numerically unstable in certain cases. Here, we present a simple and robust algorithm to rapidly determine the optimal rotation using a Newton‐Raphson quaternion‐based method and an adjoint matrix. Our method is at least an order of magnitude more efficient than conventional inversion/decomposition methods, and it should be particularly useful for high‐throughput analyses of molecular conformations. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2010

1 January 2014 in Stroke
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HKHermano I. Krebs
Hermano I. Krebs
MKMichael Krams
Michael Krams
DADimitris K. Agrafiotis
Dimitris K. Agrafiotis
ADAllitia DiBernardo
Allitia DiBernardo
JCJuan C. Chavez
Juan C. Chavez
BVBruce T. Volpe
Bruce T. Volpe
Background and Purpose—: Because robotic devices record the kinematics and kinetics of human movements with high resolution, we hypothesized that robotic measures collected longitudinally in patients after stroke would bear a significant relationship to standard clinical outcome measures and, therefore, might provide superior biomarkers. Methods—: In patients with moderate-to-severe acute ischemic stroke, we used clinical scales and robotic devices to measure arm movement 7, 14, 21, 30, and 90 days after the event at 2 clinical sites. The robots are interactive devices that measure speed, position, and force so that calculated kinematic and kinetic parameters could be compared with clinical assessments. Results—: Among 208 patients, robotic measures predicted well the clinical measures (cross-validated R 2 of modified Rankin scale=0.60; National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale=0.63; Fugl-Meyer=0.73; Motor Power=0.75). When suitably scaled and combined by an artificial neural network, the robotic measures demonstrated greater sensitivity in measuring the recovery of patients from day 7 to day 90 (increased standardized effect=1.47). Conclusions—: These results demonstrate that robotic measures of motor performance will more than adequately capture outcome, and the altered effect size will reduce the required sample size. Reducing sample size will likely improve study efficiency.

1 February 2002 in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DADimitris K. Agrafiotis
Dimitris K. Agrafiotis
WCWalter Cedeño
Walter Cedeño

9 June 2003 in Journal of Computational Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DADimitris K. Agrafiotis
Dimitris K. Agrafiotis