Luca Bechini

Luca Bechini

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Luca Bechini

Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali Università degli Studi di Milano Milano Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2017 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LBLorenzo Brilli
Lorenzo Brilli
LBLuca Bechini
Luca Bechini
MBMarco Bindi
Marco Bindi
MCMarco Carozzi
Marco Carozzi
DCDaniele Cavalli
Daniele Cavalli
GBGianni Bellocchi
Gianni Bellocchi
Biogeochemical simulation models are important tools for describing and quantifying the contribution of agricultural systems to C sequestration and GHG source/sink status. The abundance of simulation tools developed over recent decades, however, creates a difficulty because predictions from different models show large variability. Discrepancies between the conclusions of different modelling studies are often ascribed to differences in the physical and biogeochemical processes incorporated in equations of C and N cycles and their interactions. Here we review the literature to determine the state-of-the-art in modelling agricultural (crop and grassland) systems. In order to carry out this study, we selected the range of biogeochemical models used by the CN-MIP consortium of FACCE-JPI (http://www.faccejpi.com): APSIM, CERES-EGC, DayCent, DNDC, DSSAT, EPIC, PaSim, RothC and STICS. In our analysis, these models were assessed for the quality and comprehensiveness of underlying processes related to pedo-climatic conditions and management practices, but also with respect to time and space of application, and for their accuracy in multiple contexts. Overall, it emerged that there is a possible impact of ill-defined pedo-climatic conditions in the unsatisfactory performance of the models (46.2%), followed by limitations in the algorithms simulating the effects of management practices (33.1%). The multiplicity of scales in both time and space is a fundamental feature, which explains the remaining weaknesses (i.e. 20.7%). Innovative aspects have been identified for future development of C and N models. They include the explicit representation of soil microbial biomass to drive soil organic matter turnover, the effect of N shortage on SOM decomposition, the improvements related to the production and consumption of gases and an adequate simulations of gas transport in soil. On these bases, the assessment of trends and gaps in the modelling approaches currently employed to represent biogeochemical cycles in crop and grassland systems appears an essential step for future research.

10 October 2014 in Soil Use and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TLT. Lehtinen
T. Lehtinen
NSN. Schlatter
N. Schlatter
ABA. Baumgarten
A. Baumgarten
LBL. Bechini
L. Bechini
JKJ. Krüger
J. Krüger
HSHeide Spiegel
Heide Spiegel

1 February 2016 in European Journal of Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DCDaniele Cavalli
Daniele Cavalli
Giovanni CabassiGiovanni Cabassi
Giovanni Cabassi
LBLamberto Borrelli
Lamberto Borrelli
GGGabriele Geromel
Gabriele Geromel
LBLuca Bechini
Luca Bechini
PGPietro Marino Gallina
Pietro Marino Gallina

1 January 2010 in European Journal of Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NCNicola Castoldi
Nicola Castoldi
LBLuca Bechini
Luca Bechini

1 October 2017 in European Journal of Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Laura ZavattaroLaura Zavattaro
Laura Zavattaro
LBLuca Bechini
Luca Bechini
CGCarlo Grignani
Carlo Grignani
FEFrits Van Evert
Frits Van Evert
JMJanine Mallast
Janine Mallast
HBHein F.M. Ten Berge
Hein F.M. Ten Berge

1 August 2004 in European Journal of Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RCRoberto Confalonieri
Roberto Confalonieri
LBLuca Bechini
Luca Bechini