Background: Local progression of intracranial tumors can be the consequence of insufficient radiation dose delivered. Dose increases in the brain must be made carefully so as not to risk debilitating adverse effects such as radiation necrosis. Hypothesis: A new protocol with 10 × 4 Gy + 11% physical dose increase limited to the macroscopic tumor volume results in a clinically better outcome compared to a 10 × 4 Gy protocol. Animals: Fifty-seven client-owned dogs with primary intracranial neoplasia. Methods: Randomized controlled trial. Twenty-eight dogs were assigned to the control protocol (10 × 4 Gy) and 29 to the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) protocol with 4.45 Gy dose increase. Treatment groups were compared for outcome and signs of toxicity. Results: Mild, transient acute or early-delayed adverse radiation effects were observed in 5 dogs. Severe late adverse effects were not seen. Between the protocols, no significant differences were found for outcome (intention-to-treat analysis): overall time to progression (TTP) was 708 days (95% confidence interval (95% CI) [545,872]), in the control group it was 828 days (95% CI [401,1256]), and in the SIB group 627 days (95% CI [282,973]; P = .07). Median overall survival (OS) was 684 days (95% CI [516,853]), in the control group it was 724 days (95% CI [623,826]), and in the SIB group 557 days (95% CI [95,1020]; P = .47). None of the tested variables was prognostic in terms of outcome. Conclusion and Clinical Importance: The dose escalation used with an 11% physical dose increase did not result in better outcome.

Image‐guided, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IG‐IMRT) reduces dose to pelvic organs at risk without losing dose coverage to the planning target volume (PTV) and might permit margin reductions potentially resulting in lower toxicity. Appropriate PTV margins have not been established for IG‐IMRT in abdominopelvic tumours in dogs, and herein we explore if our usual PTV 5 mm margin can be reduced further. Datasets from dogs that underwent IG‐IMRT for non‐genitourinary abdominopelvic neoplasia with 5 mm‐PTV expansion were included in this retrospective virtual study. The clinical target volumes and organs at risk (OAR) colon, rectum, spinal cord were adapted to each co‐registered cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) used for positioning. New treatment plans were generated and smaller PTV margins of 3 mm and 4 mm evaluated with respect to adequate dose coverage and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of OAR. Ten dogs with a total of 70 CBCTs were included. Doses to the OAR of each CBCT deviated mildly from the originally planned doses. In some plans, insufficient build‐up of the high dose‐area at the body surface was found due to inadequate or missing bolus placement. Overall, the margin reduction to 4 mm or 3 mm did not impair dose coverage and led to significantly lower NTCP in all OAR except for spinal cord delayed myelopathy. However, overall NTCP for spinal cord was very low (<4%). PTV‐margins depend on patient immobilization and treatment technique and accuracy. IG‐IMRT allows treatment with very small margins in the abdominopelvic region, ensuring appropriate target dose coverage, while minimizing NTCP.

Purpose: Complete resection is a key prognostic factor for survival in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS), in humas and companion animals alike. Fluorescence-guided surgery could improve resection accuracy. As dogs are frequently affected by STS, they serve as a model to test an anti-α_vβ₃ integrin targeting near-infrared fluorescent (NIRF) dye (Angiostamp^TM800) for fluorescence-guided surgery in STS to evaluate its safety and feasibility in dogs, and if it translates into a clinically relevant benefit compared to the standard of care with regards to completeness of surgery and local recurrence. Furthermore, we aimed to correlate target expression and NIRF-signal intensity. Methods: Twenty dogs with STS were randomly allocated to either receive Angiostamp™ (NIRF group) or physiologic saline (control group) preoperatively. The researchers were blinded for treatment, and resections were adapted based on the NIRF-signal, if needed. Margin status was histologically determined at the 1 and 3 cm margin. The tumor-to-background ratio was measured in native tissue biopsies and formalin-fixed tissue. The fluorescent area was compared to the corresponding tumor areas as confirmed by histology using the Dice coefficient. Target expression was quantified by immunohistochemistry and correlated to NIRF-signal ratios. Results: A fluorescent signal was detected in all 10 tumors of the NIRF group, with a tumor-to-background ratio of 7.4 ± 5.8 in native biopsies and 13.5 ± 10.9 in formalin-fixed tissue. In the NIRF group, resection margins were adapted in 5/10 cases, leading to complete resection and preventing R1 in four of these cases. In the NIRF and control group 9/10 and 8/10 resections were R0, with one local recurrence in each group and one sarcoma-related death in the NIRF group. The NIRF-signal correlated with the histologically confirmed tumor area (Dice coefficient 0.75 ± 0.17). Target expression was higher in tumor compared to peritumoral tissue (p < 0.0003) and showed a moderate correlation with the NIRF-signal (r = 0.6516, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Fluorescence-guided surgery using Angiostamp™ can pinpoint residual disease in the tumor bed and contributes to an improved resection accuracy in canine STS.

The prognosis for canine sinonasal tumors remains rather poor despite definitive‐intent radiotherapy (RT). Theoretical calculations predicted improved outcomes with simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) protocols. With the hypothesis of clinically detectable differences in outcome between groups, our retrospective study evaluated prognostic variables and outcome in dogs treated with regular versus SIB RT. Dogs with sinonasal tumors treated with either a regular (10 × 4.2 Gy) or new SIB protocol (10 × 4.83 Gy to macroscopic tumor) were included. Information regarding signalment, tumor stage, type, clinical signs, radiation toxicity, response, and outcome was collected. Forty‐nine dogs were included: 27 treated regularly and 22 treated with SIB RT. A total of 69.4% showed epistaxis, 6.1% showed epileptic seizures, 46.9% showed stage IV tumors, and 6.1% showed lymph node metastases. Early toxicity was mostly mild. Late grade 1 skin toxicity (alopecia/leucotrichia) was seen in 72.1% of dogs, and a possible grade 3 ocular toxicity (blindness) was seen in one dog. Complete/partial resolution of clinical signs was seen in 95.9% of patients as best clinical response and partial remission was seen as best imaging response in 34.7%. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 274 days (95% CI: 117–383) for regular and 300 days (95% CI: 143–451) for SIB RT, which was not significantly different (P = 0.42). Similarly, the median overall survival (OS) was 348 days (95% CI: 121–500) for regular and 381 days (95% CI: 295–634) for the SIB RT (P = 0.18). Stratified by protocol, the hazard ratio of stage IV versus stage I–III tumors was 2.29 (95% CI: 1.156‐4.551,P = 0.02) for OS but not PFS. All dogs showed acceptable toxicity. In contrast to theoretical predictions, however, we could not show a statistically significant better outcome with the new protocol.