Camille Albouy

Camille Albouy

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Camille Albouy

Department of Environmental Systems Science, Ecosystems and Landscape Evolution, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems ETH Zürich Zürich Switzerland

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 July 2011 in Global Ecology and Biogeography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MCMarta Coll
Marta Coll
CPChiara Piroddi
Chiara Piroddi
CACamille Albouy
Camille Albouy
FLFrida Ben Rais Lasram
Frida Ben Rais Lasram
WCWilliam W. L. Cheung
William W. L. Cheung
Daniel M. PaulyDaniel M. Pauly
Daniel M. Pauly

13 December 2021 in Ecography
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMCamille Magneville
Camille Magneville
NLNicolas Loiseau
Nicolas Loiseau
CACamille Albouy
Camille Albouy
NCNicolas Casajus
Nicolas Casajus
TCThomas Claverie
Thomas Claverie
SVSébastien Villéger
Sébastien Villéger
Functional diversity (FD), the diversity of organism attributes that relates to their interactions with the abiotic and biotic environment, has been increasingly used for the last two decades in ecology, biogeography and conservation. Yet, FD has many facets and their estimations are not standardized nor embedded in a single tool. mFD (multifaceted functional diversity) is an R package that uses matrices of species assemblages and species trait values as building blocks to compute most FD indices. mFD is firstly based on two functions allowing the user to summarize trait and assemblage data. Then it calculates trait‐based distances between species pairs, informs the user whether species have to be clustered into functional entities and finally computes multidimensional functional space. To let the user choose the most appropriate functional space for computing multidimensional functional diversity indices, two mFD functions allow assessing and illustrating the quality of each functional space. Next, mFD provides 6 core functions to calculate 16 existing FD indices based on trait‐based distances, functional entities or species position in a functional space. The mFD package also provides graphical functions based on the ggplot library to illustrate FD values through customizable and high‐resolution plots of species distribution among functional entities or in a multidimensional space. All functions include internal validation processes to check for errors in data formatting which return detailed error messages. To facilitate the use of mFD framework, we built an associated website hosting five tutorials illustrating the use of all the functions step by step.

22 September 2017 in Biological Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LPLoïc Pellissier
Loïc Pellissier
CACamille Albouy
Camille Albouy
JBJordi Bascompte
Jordi Bascompte
NFNina Farwig
Nina Farwig
CGCatherine Graham
Catherine Graham
DGDominique Gravel
Dominique Gravel
Knowledge of species composition and their interactions, in the form of interaction networks, is required to understand processes shaping their distribution over time and space. As such, comparing ecological networks along environmental gradients represents a promising new research avenue to understand the organization of life. Variation in the position and intensity of links within networks along environmental gradients may be driven by turnover in species composition, by variation in species abundances and by abiotic influences on species interactions. While investigating changes in species composition has a long tradition, so far only a limited number of studies have examined changes in species interactions between networks, often with differing approaches. Here, we review studies investigating variation in network structures along environmental gradients, highlighting how methodological decisions about standardization can influence their conclusions. Due to their complexity, variation among ecological networks is frequently studied using properties that summarize the distribution or topology of interactions such as number of links, connectance, or modularity. These properties can either be compared directly or using a procedure of standardization. While measures of network structure can be directly related to changes along environmental gradients, standardization is frequently used to facilitate interpretation of variation in network properties by controlling for some co‐variables, or via null models. Null models allow comparing the deviation of empirical networks from random expectations and are expected to provide a more mechanistic understanding of the factors shaping ecological networks when they are coupled with functional traits. As an illustration, we compare approaches to quantify the role of trait matching in driving the structure of plant–hummingbird mutualistic networks, i.e. a direct comparison, standardized by null models and hypothesis‐based metaweb. Overall, our analysis warns against a comparison of studies that rely on distinct forms of standardization, as they are likely to highlight different signals. Fostering a better understanding of the analytical tools available and the signal they detect will help produce deeper insights into how and why ecological networks vary along environmental gradients.

3 November 2010 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FLFrida BEN Rais Lasram
Frida BEN Rais Lasram
FGFrançois Guilhaumon
François Guilhaumon
CACamille Albouy
Camille Albouy
SSSamuel Somot
Samuel Somot
WTWilfried Thuiller
Wilfried Thuiller
DMDavid Mouillot
David Mouillot

2 September 2013 in Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DGDominique Gravel
Dominique Gravel
TPTimothée Poisot
Timothée Poisot
CACamille Albouy
Camille Albouy
LVLaure Velez
Laure Velez
DMDavid Mouillot
David Mouillot

10 February 2020 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMStéphanie Manel
Stéphanie Manel
PGPierre-Edouard Guerin
Pierre-Edouard Guerin
DMDavid Mouillot
David Mouillot
SBSimon Blanchet
Simon Blanchet
LVLaure Velez
Laure Velez
LPLoïc Pellissier
Loïc Pellissier
Genetic diversity is estimated to be declining faster than species diversity under escalating threats, but its spatial distribution remains poorly documented at the global scale. Theory predicts that similar processes should foster congruent spatial patterns of genetic and species diversity, but empirical studies are scarce. Using a mined database of 50,588 georeferenced mitochondrial DNA barcode sequences (COI) for 3,815 marine and 1,611 freshwater fish species respectively, we examined the correlation between genetic diversity and species diversity and their global distributions in relation to climate and geography. Genetic diversity showed a clear spatial organisation, but a weak association with species diversity for both marine and freshwater species. We found a predominantly positive relationship between genetic diversity and sea surface temperature for marine species. Genetic diversity of freshwater species varied primarily across the regional basins and was negatively correlated with average river slope. The detection of genetic diversity patterns suggests that conservation measures should consider mismatching spatial signals across multiple facets of biodiversity.