Amgaa Batbaatar

Amgaa Batbaatar

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Amgaa Batbaatar

Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 May 2020 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AFAlessandro Filazzola
Alessandro Filazzola
CBCharlotte Brown
Charlotte Brown
MDMargarete A Dettlaff
Margarete A Dettlaff
ABAmgaa Batbaatar
Amgaa Batbaatar
JGJessica Grenke
Jessica Grenke
JCJames F Cahill
James F Cahill
Anthropogenic disturbance has generated a significant loss of biodiversity worldwide and grazing by domestic herbivores is a contributing disturbance. Although the effects of grazing on plants are commonly explored, here we address the potential multi‐trophic effects on animal biodiversity (e.g. herbivores, pollinators and predators). We conducted a meta‐analysis on 109 independent studies that tested the response of animals or plants to livestock grazing relative to livestock excluded. Across all animals, livestock exclusion increased abundance and diversity, but these effects were greatest for trophic levels directly dependent on plants, such as herbivores and pollinators. Detritivores were the only trophic level whose abundance decreased with livestock exclusion. We also found that the number of years since livestock was excluded influenced the community and that the effects of grazer exclusion on animal diversity were strongest in temperate climates. These findings synthesise the effects of livestock grazing beyond plants and demonstrate the indirect impacts of livestock grazing on multiple trophic levels in the animal community. We identified the potentially long‐term impacts that livestock grazing can have on lower trophic levels and consequences for biological conservation. We also highlight the potentially inevitable cost to global biodiversity from livestock grazing that must be balanced against socio‐economic benefits.

28 January 2021 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JDJohn Davison
John Davison
MMMari Moora
Mari Moora
MSMarina Semchenko
Marina Semchenko
SASakeenah Binte Adenan
Sakeenah Binte Adenan
TATalaat Ahmed
Talaat Ahmed
MÖMaarja Öpik
Maarja Öpik

8 January 2024 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MSMelinda D. Smith
Melinda D. Smith
KWKate D. Wilkins
Kate D. Wilkins
MHMartin Holdrege
Martin Holdrege
PWPeter Wilfahrt
Peter Wilfahrt
SCScott L. Collins
Scott L. Collins
XZXiaoan Zuo
Xiaoan Zuo
Climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of short-term (~1 y) drought events—the most common duration of drought—globally. Yet the impact of this intensification of drought on ecosystem functioning remains poorly resolved. This is due in part to the widely disparate approaches ecologists have employed to study drought, variation in the severity and duration of drought studied, and differences among ecosystems in vegetation, edaphic and climatic attributes that can mediate drought impacts. To overcome these problems and better identify the factors that modulate drought responses, we used a coordinated distributed experiment to quantify the impact of short-term drought on grassland and shrubland ecosystems. With a standardized approach, we imposed ~a single year of drought at 100 sites on six continents. Here we show that loss of a foundational ecosystem function—aboveground net primary production (ANPP)—was 60% greater at sites that experienced statistically extreme drought (1-in-100-y event) vs. those sites where drought was nominal (historically more common) in magnitude (35% vs. 21%, respectively). This reduction in a key carbon cycle process with a single year of extreme drought greatly exceeds previously reported losses for grasslands and shrublands. Our global experiment also revealed high variability in drought response but that relative reductions in ANPP were greater in drier ecosystems and those with fewer plant species. Overall, our results demonstrate with unprecedented rigor that the global impacts of projected increases in drought severity have been significantly underestimated and that drier and less diverse sites are likely to be most vulnerable to extreme drought.

16 October 2025 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TOTimothy Ohlert
Timothy Ohlert
MSMelinda D. Smith
Melinda D. Smith
SCScott L. Collins
Scott L. Collins
AKAlan K. Knapp
Alan K. Knapp
JDJeffrey S. Dukes
Jeffrey S. Dukes
XZXiaoan Zuo
Xiaoan Zuo
As droughts become longer and more intense, impacts on terrestrial primary productivity are expected to increase progressively. Yet, some ecosystems appear to acclimate to multiyear drought, with constant or diminishing reductions in productivity as drought duration increases. We quantified the combined effects of drought duration and intensity on aboveground productivity in 74 grasslands and shrublands distributed globally. Ecosystem acclimation with multiyear drought was observed overall, except when droughts were extreme (i.e., ≤1-in-100-year likelihood of occurrence). Productivity losses after four consecutive years of extreme drought increased by ~2.5-fold compared with those of the first year. These results portend a foundational shift in ecosystem behavior if drought duration and intensity increase, from maintenance of reduced functioning over time to progressive and profound losses of productivity when droughts are extreme.

4 March 2021 in Journal of Vegetation Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ABAmgaa Batbaatar
Amgaa Batbaatar
EBEdward W. Bork
Edward W. Bork
TBTanner Broadbent
Tanner Broadbent
MAMike J. Alexander
Mike J. Alexander
JCJames F. Cahill
James F. Cahill
CCCameron N. Carlyle
Cameron N. Carlyle

22 October 2021 in Journal of Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ABAmgaa Batbaatar
Amgaa Batbaatar
CCCameron Carlyle
Cameron Carlyle
EBEdward Bork
Edward Bork
Scott X. ChangScott X. Chang
Scott X. Chang
JCJames F. Cahill
James F. Cahill