Marcus Robert Munafo

Marcus Robert Munafo

Top Cited Scholar 2026
Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Marcus Robert Munafo

Vice Chancellor’s Office, University of Bath, United Kingdom

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 April 2013 in Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KBKatherine S. Button
Katherine S. Button
JIJohn P. A. Ioannidis
John P. A. Ioannidis
CMClaire Mokrysz
Claire Mokrysz
BNBrian A. Nosek
Brian A. Nosek
JFJonathan Flint
Jonathan Flint
MMMarcus R. Munafò
Marcus R. Munafò

10 January 2017 in Nature Human Behaviour
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMarcus R. Munafò
Marcus R. Munafò
BNBrian A. Nosek
Brian A. Nosek
DBDorothy Bishop
Dorothy Bishop
KBKatherine S. Button
Katherine S. Button
CCChristopher D. Chambers
Christopher D. Chambers
JIJohn P. A. Ioannidis
John P. A. Ioannidis
Improving the reliability and efficiency of scientific research will increase the credibility of the published scientific literature and accelerate discovery. Here we argue for the adoption of measures to optimize key elements of the scientific process: methods, reporting and dissemination, reproducibility, evaluation and incentives. There is some evidence from both simulations and empirical studies supporting the likely effectiveness of these measures, but their broad adoption by researchers, institutions, funders and journals will require iterative evaluation and improvement. We discuss the goals of these measures, and how they can be implemented, in the hope that this will facilitate action toward improving the transparency, reproducibility and efficiency of scientific research.

1 September 2017 in Nature Human Behaviour
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDaniel J. Benjamin
Daniel J. Benjamin
JBJames O. Berger
James O. Berger
MJMagnus Johannesson
Magnus Johannesson
BNBrian A. Nosek
Brian A. Nosek
EWE.-J. Wagenmakers
E.-J. Wagenmakers
VJValen E. Johnson
Valen E. Johnson
We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims of new discoveries.

14 January 2019 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MLMengzhen Liu
Mengzhen Liu
YJYu Jiang
Yu Jiang
RWRobbee Wedow
Robbee Wedow
YLYue Li
Yue Li
DBDavid M. Brazel
David M. Brazel
HPHunt All-In Psychiatry
Hunt All-In Psychiatry

5 January 2017 in Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RPRussell A. Poldrack
Russell A. Poldrack
CBChris I. Baker
Chris I. Baker
JDJoke Durnez
Joke Durnez
KGKrzysztof J. Gorgolewski
Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski
PMPaul M. Matthews
Paul M. Matthews
TYTal Yarkoni
Tal Yarkoni
There is growing concern about the reproducibility of scientific research, and neuroimaging research suffers from many features that are thought to lead to high levels of false results. Statistical power of neuroimaging studies has increased over time but remains relatively low, especially for group comparison studies. An analysis of effect sizes in the Human Connectome Project demonstrates that most functional MRI studies are not sufficiently powered to find reasonable effect sizes. Neuroimaging analysis has a high degree of flexibility in analysis methods, which can lead to inflated false-positive rates unless controlled for. Pre-registration of analysis plans and clear delineation of hypothesis-driven and exploratory research are potential solutions to this problem. The use of appropriate corrections for multiple tests has increased, but some common methods can have highly inflated false-positive rates. The use of non-parametric methods is encouraged to provide accurate correction for multiple tests. Software errors have the potential to lead to incorrect or irreproducible results. The adoption of improved software engineering methods and software testing strategies can help to reduce such problems. Reproducibility will be improved through greater transparency in methods reporting and through increased sharing of data and code.

17 November 2011 in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RHRosemary Hiscock
Rosemary Hiscock
LBLinda Bauld
Linda Bauld
AAAmanda Amos
Amanda Amos
JFJennifer A. Fidler
Jennifer A. Fidler
MMMarcus Munafò
Marcus Munafò