Sidinh Luc

Sidinh Luc

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Sidinh Luc

Haematopoietic Stem Cell Laboratory, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 September 2015 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMatthew C. Canver
Matthew C. Canver
ESElenoe C. Smith
Elenoe C. Smith
FSFalak Sher
Falak Sher
LPLuca Pinello
Luca Pinello
NSNeville E. Sanjana
Neville E. Sanjana
DBDaniel E. Bauer
Daniel E. Bauer
Enhancers, critical determinants of cellular identity, are commonly recognized by correlative chromatin marks and gain-of-function potential, although only loss-of-function studies can demonstrate their requirement in the native genomic context. Previously, we identified an erythroid enhancer of human BCL11A, subject to common genetic variation associated with the fetal haemoglobin level, the mouse orthologue of which is necessary for erythroid BCL11A expression. Here we develop pooled clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-Cas9 guide RNA libraries to perform in situ saturating mutagenesis of the human and mouse enhancers. This approach reveals critical minimal features and discrete vulnerabilities of these enhancers. Despite conserved function of the composite enhancers, their architecture diverges. The crucial human sequences appear to be primate-specific. Through editing of primary human progenitors and mouse transgenesis, we validate the BCL11A erythroid enhancer as a target for fetal haemoglobin reinduction. The detailed enhancer map will inform therapeutic genome editing, and the screening approach described here is generally applicable to functional interrogation of non-coding genomic elements.

1 April 2007 in Immunity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMRobert Månsson
Robert Månsson
AHAnne Hultquist
Anne Hultquist
SLSidinh Luc
Sidinh Luc
LYLiping Yang
Liping Yang
KAKristina Anderson
Kristina Anderson
SJSten Eirik W. Jacobsen
Sten Eirik W. Jacobsen

1 November 2013 in Cell Stem Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBCharlotta Böiers
Charlotta Böiers
JCJoana Carrelha
Joana Carrelha
MLMichael Lutteropp
Michael Lutteropp
SLSidinh Luc
Sidinh Luc
JGJoanna C.A. Green
Joanna C.A. Green
SJSten Eirik W. Jacobsen
Sten Eirik W. Jacobsen

18 June 2013 in eLife
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MKMarc A Kerenyi
Marc A Kerenyi
ZSZhen Shao
Zhen Shao
YHYu-Jung Hsu
Yu-Jung Hsu
GGGuoji Guo
Guoji Guo
SLSidinh Luc
Sidinh Luc
SOStuart H Orkin
Stuart H Orkin
Here, we describe that lysine-specific demethylase 1 (Lsd1/KDM1a), which demethylates histone H3 on Lys4 or Lys9 (H3K4/K9), is an indispensible epigenetic governor of hematopoietic differentiation. Integrative genomic analysis, combining global occupancy of Lsd1, genome-wide analysis of its substrates H3K4 monomethylation and dimethylation, and gene expression profiling, reveals that Lsd1 represses hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) gene expression programs during hematopoietic differentiation. We found that Lsd1 acts at transcription start sites, as well as enhancer regions. Loss of Lsd1 was associated with increased H3K4me1 and H3K4me2 methylation on HSPC genes and gene derepression. Failure to fully silence HSPC genes compromised differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells as well as mature blood cell lineages. Collectively, our data indicate that Lsd1-mediated concurrent repression of enhancer and promoter activity of stem and progenitor cell genes is a pivotal epigenetic mechanism required for proper hematopoietic maturation.

1 October 2013 in Cell Stem Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GGGuoji Guo
Guoji Guo
SLSidinh Luc
Sidinh Luc
EMEugenio Marco
Eugenio Marco
TLTa-Wei Lin
Ta-Wei Lin
CPCong Peng
Cong Peng
SOStuart H. Orkin
Stuart H. Orkin

19 February 2012 in Nature Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLSidinh Luc
Sidinh Luc
TLTiago C Luis
Tiago C Luis
HBHanane Boukarabila
Hanane Boukarabila
IMIain C Macaulay
Iain C Macaulay
NBNatalija Buza-Vidas
Natalija Buza-Vidas
SJSten Eirik W Jacobsen
Sten Eirik W Jacobsen
The commitment stage at which progenitors seed the thymus remains unclear. Jacobsen and colleagues show that the earliest progenitors in the neonatal thymus have combined myeloid, T lymphocyte and B lymphocyte potential but not megakaryocyte-erythroid potential. The stepwise commitment from hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow to T lymphocyte–restricted progenitors in the thymus represents a paradigm for understanding the requirement for distinct extrinsic cues during different stages of lineage restriction from multipotent to lineage-restricted progenitors. However, the commitment stage at which progenitors migrate from the bone marrow to the thymus remains unclear. Here we provide functional and molecular evidence at the single-cell level that the earliest progenitors in the neonatal thymus had combined granulocyte-monocyte, T lymphocyte and B lymphocyte lineage potential but not megakaryocyte-erythroid lineage potential. These potentials were identical to those of candidate thymus-seeding progenitors in the bone marrow, which were closely related at the molecular level. Our findings establish the distinct lineage-restriction stage at which the T cell lineage–commitment process transits from the bone marrow to the remote thymus.