Andrei Andreevich Kudinov

Andrei Andreevich Kudinov

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Andrei Andreevich Kudinov

Natural Resources Institute Finland, Jokioinen, Finland

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 April 2019 in BMC Genomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAndrei A. Kudinov
Andrei A. Kudinov
Natalia DementievaNatalia Dementieva
Natalia Dementieva
OMOlga V. Mitrofanova
Olga V. Mitrofanova
YSYuliya Silyukova
Yuliya Silyukova
EFElena Fedorova
Elena Fedorova
Michael N. RomanovMichael N. Romanov
Michael N. Romanov
The Russian White is a gene pool breed, registered in 1953 after crossing White Leghorns with local populations and, for 50 years, selected for cold tolerance and high egg production (EL). The breed has great potential in meeting demands of local food producers, commercial farmers and biotechnology sector of specific pathogen-free (SPF) eggs, the former valuing the breed for its egg weight (EW), EL, age at first egg (AFE), body weight (BW), and the latter for its yield of extraembryonic fluid (YEF) in 12.5-day embryos, ratio of extraembryonic fluid to egg weight, and embryo mass. Moreover, its cold tolerance has been presumably associated with day-old chick down colour (DOCDC) – white rather than yellow, the genetic basis of these traits being however poorly understood. We undertook genome-wide association studies (GWASs) for eight performance traits using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping of 146 birds and an Illumina 60KBeadChip. Several suggestive associations (p < 5.16*10− 5) were found for YEF, AFE, BW and EW. Moreover, on chromosome 2, an association with the white DOCDC was found where there is an linkage disequilibrium block of SNPs including genes that are responsible not for colour, but for immune resistance. The obtained GWAS data can be used to explore the genetics of immunity and carry out selection for increasing YEF for SPF eggs production.

1 July 2020 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKA.A. Kudinov
A.A. Kudinov
EME.A. Mäntysaari
E.A. Mäntysaari
GAGert Pedersen Aamand
Gert Pedersen Aamand
PUP. Uimari
P. Uimari
ISIsmo Stranden
Ismo Stranden
Single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) is a powerful approach for breeding value prediction in populations with a limited number of genotyped animals. However, conflicting genomic (G) and pedigree (A22) relationship matrices complicate the implementation of ssGBLUP into practice. The metafounder (MF) approach is a recently proposed solution for this problem and has been successfully used on simulated and real multi-breed pig data. Advantages of the method are easily seen across breed evaluations, where pedigrees are traced to several pure breeds, which are thereafter used as MF. Application of the MF method to ruminants is complicated due to multi-breed pedigree structures and the inability to transmit existing unknown parent groups (UPG) to MF. In this study, we apply the MF approach for ssGBLUP evaluation of Finnish Red Dairy cattle treated as a single breed. Relationships among MF were accounted for by a (co)variance matrix (Γ) computed using estimated base population allele frequencies. The attained Γ was used to calculate a relationship matrix A22Γ for the genotyped animals. We tested the influence of SNP selection on the Γ matrix by applying a minor allele frequency (MAF) threshold (ΓMAF) where accepted markers had an MAF ≥0.05. Elements in the ΓMAF matrix were slightly lower than in the Γ matrix. Correlation between diagonal elements of the genomic and pedigree relationship matrices increased from 0.53 (A22) to 0.76 ( A22Γ and [Formula: see text] ). Average diagonal elements of A22Γ and [Formula: see text] matrices increased to the same level as in the G matrix. The ssGBLUP breeding values (GEBV) were solved using either the original 236 or redefined 8 UPG, or 8 MF computed with or without the MAF threshold. For bulls, the GEBV validation test results for the 8 UPG and 8 MF gave the same validation reliability (R2; 0.31) and over-dispersion (0.73, measured by regression coefficient b1). No significant R2 increase was observed in cows. Thus, the MF greatly influenced the pedigree relationship matrices but not the GEBV. Selection of SNP according to MAF had a notable effect on the Γ matrix and made the A22 and G matrices more similar.

15 October 2020 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Natalia DementievaNatalia Dementieva
Natalia Dementieva
AKAndrei A. Kudinov
Andrei A. Kudinov
TLTatyana Larkina
Tatyana Larkina
OMOlga V. Mitrofanova
Olga V. Mitrofanova
ADArtem P. Dysin
Artem P. Dysin
Michael N. RomanovMichael N. Romanov
Michael N. Romanov
Preserving breed uniqueness and purity is vitally important in developing conservation/breeding programs for a germplasm collection of rare and endangered chicken breeds. The present study was aimed at analyzing SNP genetic variability of 21 small local and imported purebred and F1 crossbred populations and identifying crossbreeding events via whole-genome evaluation of runs of homozygosity (ROH). The admixture models more efficiently reflected population structure, pinpointing crossbreeding events in the presence of ancestral populations but not in their absence. Multidimensional scaling and FST-based analyses did not discriminate properly between purebred populations and F1 crossbreds, especially when comparing related breeds. When applying the ROH-based approach, more and longer ROHs were revealed in purebred individuals/populations, suggesting this as an effective implement in genome-wide analysis of germplasm breed purity.

1 March 2021 in Animal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Natalia DementievaNatalia Dementieva
Natalia Dementieva
OMO.V. Mitrofanova
O.V. Mitrofanova
ADArtem P. Dysin
Artem P. Dysin
AKA.A. Kudinov
A.A. Kudinov
YSYuliya Silyukova
Yuliya Silyukova
MSMichael Grigorievich Smaragdov
Michael Grigorievich Smaragdov
Phenotypic diversity in poultry has been mainly driven by artificial selection and genetic drift. These led to the adaptation to the environment and the development of specific phenotypic traits of chickens in response to their economic use. This study evaluated genetic diversity within and between Russian breeds and populations using Illumina Chicken 60K SNP iSelect BeadChip by analysing genetic differences between populations with Hudson's fixation index (FST statistic) and heterozygosity. We estimated the effect of rare alleles and linkage disequilibrium (LD) on these measurements. To assess the effect of LD on the genetic diversity population, we carried out the LD-based pruning (LD<0.5 and LD<0.1) for seven chicken populations combined (I) or separately (II). LD pruning was specific for different dataset groups. Because of the noticeably large sample size in the Russian White RG population, pruning was substantial for Dataset I, and FST values were only positive when LD<0.1 pruning was applied. For Dataset II, the LD pruning results were confirmed by examining heterozygosity and alleles' frequency distribution. LD between single nucleotide polymorphisms was consistent across the seven chicken populations, except the Russian White RG population with the smallest r2 values and the largest effective population size. Our findings suggest to study variability in each population LD pruning has to be carried separately not after merging to avoid bias in estimates.

1 June 2017 in Sel'skokhozyaistvennaya Biologiya
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Natalia DementievaNatalia Dementieva
Natalia Dementieva
Michael N. RomanovMichael N. Romanov
Michael N. Romanov
AKA.A. Kudinov
A.A. Kudinov
OMO.V. Mitrofanova Mitrofanova
O.V. Mitrofanova Mitrofanova
YSYuliya Silyukova
Yuliya Silyukova
KPK.V. Plemyashov
K.V. Plemyashov

28 April 2020 in BMC Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMichael Grigorievich Smaragdov
Michael Grigorievich Smaragdov
AKA. A. Kudinov
A. A. Kudinov
Background: Due to the advent of SNP array technology, a genome-wide analysis of genetic differences between populations and breeds has become possible at a previously unattainable level. The Wright’s fixation index (Fst) and the principal component analysis (PCA) are widely used methods in animal genetics studies. In paper we compared the power of these methods, their complementing each other and which of them is the most powerful. Results: Comparative analysis of the power Principal Components Analysis (PCA) and Fst were carried out to reveal genetic differences between herds of Holsteinized cows. Totally, 803 BovineSNP50 genotypes of cows from 13 herds were used in current study. Obtained Fst values were in the range of 0.002–0.012 (mean 0.0049) while for rare SNPs with MAF 0.0001–0.005 they were even smaller in the range of 0.001–0.01 (mean 0.0027). Genetic relatedness of the cows in the herds was the cause of such small Fst values. The contribution of rare alleles with MAF 0.0001–0.01 to the Fst values was much less than common alleles and this effect depends on linkage disequilibrium (LD). Despite of substantial change in the MAF spectrum and the number of SNPs we observed small effect size of LD - based pruning on Fst data. PCA analysis confirmed the mutual admixture and small genetic difference between herds. Moreover, PCA analysis of the herds based on the visualization the results of a single eigenvector cannot be used to significantly differentiate herds. Only summed eigenvectors should be used to realize full power of PCA to differentiate small between herds genetic difference. Finally, we presented evidences that the significance of Fst data far exceeds the significance of PCA data when these methods are used to reveal genetic differences between herds. Conclusions: LD - based pruning had a small effect on findings of Fst and PCA analyzes. Therefore, for weakly structured populations the LD - based pruning is not effective. In addition, our results show that the significance of genetic differences between herds obtained by Fst analysis exceeds the values of PCA. Proposed, to differentiate herds or low structured populations we recommend primarily using the Fst approach and only then PCA.