Mengqi Zhang

Mengqi Zhang

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Mengqi Zhang

Shandong University

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2024
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
Pengjie RenPengjie Ren
Pengjie Ren
CSChengshun Shi
Chengshun Shi
SWShiguang Wu
Shiguang Wu
MZMengqi Zhang
Mengqi Zhang
ZRZhaochun Ren
Zhaochun Ren
JPJiahuan Pei
Jiahuan Pei
Pengjie Ren, Chengshun Shi, Shiguang Wu, Mengqi Zhang, Zhaochun Ren, Maarten Rijke, Zhumin Chen, Jiahuan Pei. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.

1 January 2024
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
MZMengqi Zhang
Mengqi Zhang
XYXiaotian Ye
Xiaotian Ye
QLQiang Liu
Qiang Liu
Pengjie RenPengjie Ren
Pengjie Ren
SWShu Wu
Shu Wu
ZCZhumin Chen
Zhumin Chen
Mengqi Zhang, Xiaotian Ye, Qiang Liu, Pengjie Ren, Shu Wu, Zhumin Chen. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024.

11 April 2025 in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WZWenhao Zhang
Wenhao Zhang
MZMengqi Zhang
Mengqi Zhang
SWShiguang Wu
Shiguang Wu
JPJiahuan Pei
Jiahuan Pei
ZRZhaochun Ren
Zhaochun Ren
Pengjie RenPengjie Ren
Pengjie Ren
Exclusion is an important and universal linguistic skill that humans use to express what they do not want. There is little research on exclusionary retrieval, where users express what they do not want to be part of the results produced for their queries. We investigate the scenario of exclusionary retrieval in document retrieval for the first time. We present ExcluIR, a set of resources for exclusionary retrieval, consisting of an evaluation benchmark and a training set for helping retrieval models to comprehend exclusionary queries. The evaluation benchmark includes 3,452 high-quality exclusionary queries, each of which has been manually annotated. The training set contains 70,293 exclusionary queries, each paired with a positive document and a negative document. We conduct detailed experiments and analyses, obtaining three main observations: (i) existing retrieval models with different architectures struggle to comprehend exclusionary queries effectively; (ii) although integrating our training data can improve the performance of retrieval models on exclusionary retrieval, there still exists a gap compared to human performance; and (iii) generative retrieval models have a natural advantage in handling exclusionary queries.

1 January 2025
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
WWWenyu Wang
Wenyu Wang
MZMengqi Zhang
Mengqi Zhang
XYXiaotian Ye
Xiaotian Ye
ZRZhaochun Ren
Zhaochun Ren
Pengjie RenPengjie Ren
Pengjie Ren
ZCZhumin Chen
Zhumin Chen
Wenyu Wang, Mengqi Zhang, Xiaotian Ye, Zhaochun Ren, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025. 2025.

1 January 2024
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
ZLZhongkun Liu
Zhongkun Liu
ZCZheng Chen
Zheng Chen
MZMengqi Zhang
Mengqi Zhang
ZRZhaochun Ren
Zhaochun Ren
Pengjie RenPengjie Ren
Pengjie Ren
ZCZhumin Chen
Zhumin Chen
Zhongkun Liu, Zheng Chen, Mengqi Zhang, Zhaochun Ren, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. 2024.

22 August 2024 in arXiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
MZMengqi Zhang
Mengqi Zhang
BFBowen Fang
Bowen Fang
QLQiang Liu
Qiang Liu
Pengjie RenPengjie Ren
Pengjie Ren
SWShu Wu
Shu Wu
LWLiang Wang
Liang Wang
Large language models (LLMs) face challenges with internal knowledge inaccuracies and outdated information. Knowledge editing has emerged as a pivotal approach to mitigate these issues. Although current knowledge editing techniques exhibit promising performance in single-hop reasoning tasks, they show limitations when applied to multi-hop reasoning. Drawing on cognitive neuroscience and the operational mechanisms of LLMs, we hypothesize that the residual single-hop knowledge after editing causes edited models to revert to their original answers when processing multi-hop questions, thereby undermining their performance in multihop reasoning tasks. To validate this hypothesis, we conduct a series of experiments that empirically confirm our assumptions. Building on the validated hypothesis, we propose a novel knowledge editing method that incorporates a Knowledge Erasure mechanism for Large language model Editing (KELE). Specifically, we design an erasure function for residual knowledge and an injection function for new knowledge. Through joint optimization, we derive the optimal recall vector, which is subsequently utilized within a rank-one editing framework to update the parameters of targeted model layers. Extensive experiments on GPT-J and GPT-2 XL demonstrate that KELE substantially enhances the multi-hop reasoning capability of edited LLMs.