Gerhard Krinner

Gerhard Krinner

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Gerhard Krinner

Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, INRAE, IRD, Grenoble INP, IGE, 38000 Grenoble, France

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 July 2023
Verified
Report
Closed access
KCKatherine Calvin
Katherine Calvin
DDDipak Dasgupta
Dipak Dasgupta
GKGerhard Krinner
Gerhard Krinner
AMAditi Mukherji
Aditi Mukherji
PTPeter W. Thorne
Peter W. Thorne
MHMeeyoung Ha
Meeyoung Ha
The Synthesis Report (SYR) is a stand-alone synthesis of the most policy-relevant evidence from the scientific, technical, and socio-economic literature assessed in the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The SYR distils and integrates the main findings of the three reports of the Working Groups of the IPCC during the AR6, and the three AR6 Special Reports into a concise document. It consists of a Summary for Policymakers and a longer report.

1 September 2005 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PCPh. Ciais
Ph. Ciais
MRM. Reichstein
M. Reichstein
NVNicolas Viovy
Nicolas Viovy
AGA. Granier
A. Granier
JOJ. Ogée
J. Ogée
Riccardo ValentiniRiccardo Valentini
Riccardo Valentini

26 February 2005 in Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GKG. Krinner
G. Krinner
NVNicolas Viovy
Nicolas Viovy
NNNathalie de Noblet‐Ducoudré
Nathalie de Noblet‐Ducoudré
JOJérôme Ogée
Jérôme Ogée
JPJan Polcher
Jan Polcher
IPI. Colin Prentice
I. Colin Prentice

25 July 2023
Verified
Report
Closed access
KCKatherine Calvin
Katherine Calvin
DDDipak Dasgupta
Dipak Dasgupta
GKGerhard Krinner
Gerhard Krinner
AMAditi Mukherji
Aditi Mukherji
PTPeter W. Thorne
Peter W. Thorne
MHMeeyoung Ha
Meeyoung Ha
The Summary for Policymakers (SPM) of the Synthesis Report (SYR) of the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), is a component of the SYR which provides a policy-relevant but policy-neutral summary of the SYR. It is consistent with the Sections of the SYR and is approved line by line by the Governments at a plenary session of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

20 July 2020 in Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OBOlivier Boucher
Olivier Boucher
JSJérôme Servonnat
Jérôme Servonnat
AAAnna Lea Albright
Anna Lea Albright
OAOlivier Aumont
Olivier Aumont
YBYves Balkanski
Yves Balkanski
NVNicolas Vuichard
Nicolas Vuichard
This study presents the global climate model IPSL‐CM6A‐LR developed at IPSL to study natural climate variability and climate response to natural and anthropogenic forcings as part of the 6th phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). This article describes the different model components, their coupling, and the simulated climate in comparison to previous model versions. We focus here on the representation of the physical climate along with the main characteristics of the global carbon cycle. The model's climatology, as assessed from a range of metrics (related in particular to radiation, temperature, precipitation, wind), is strongly improved in comparison to previous model versions. Although they are reduced, a number of known biases and shortcomings (e.g., double ITCZ, frequency of midlatitude wintertime blockings, and ENSO dynamics) persist. The equilibrium climate sensitivity and transient climate response have both increased from the previous climate model IPSL‐CM5A‐LR used in CMIP5. A large ensemble of more than 30 members for the historical period (1850‐2018) and a smaller ensemble for a range of emissions scenarios (until 2100 and 2300) are also presented and discussed.

24 February 2013 in Climate Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JDJ.-L. Dufresne
J.-L. Dufresne
MFM.-A. Foujols
M.-A. Foujols
SDS. Denvil
S. Denvil
ACA. Caubel
A. Caubel
OMO. Marti
O. Marti
NVN. Vuichard
N. Vuichard
We present the global general circulation model IPSL-CM5 developed to study the long-term response of the climate system to natural and anthropogenic forcings as part of the 5th Phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). This model includes an interactive carbon cycle, a representation of tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry, and a comprehensive representation of aerosols. As it represents the principal dynamical, physical, and bio-geochemical processes relevant to the climate system, it may be referred to as an Earth System Model. However, the IPSL-CM5 model may be used in a multitude of configurations associated with different boundary conditions and with a range of complexities in terms of processes and interactions. This paper presents an overview of the different model components and explains how they were coupled and used to simulate historical climate changes over the past 150 years and different scenarios of future climate change. A single version of the IPSL-CM5 model (IPSL-CM5A-LR) was used to provide climate projections associated with different socio-economic scenarios, including the different Representative Concentration Pathways considered by CMIP5 and several scenarios from the Special Report on Emission Scenarios considered by CMIP3. Results suggest that the magnitude of global warming projections primarily depends on the socio-economic scenario considered, that there is potential for an aggressive mitigation policy to limit global warming to about two degrees, and that the behavior of some components of the climate system such as the Arctic sea ice and the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation may change drastically by the end of the twenty-first century in the case of a no climate policy scenario. Although the magnitude of regional temperature and precipitation changes depends fairly linearly on the magnitude of the projected global warming (and thus on the scenario considered), the geographical pattern of these changes is strikingly similar for the different scenarios. The representation of atmospheric physical processes in the model is shown to strongly influence the simulated climate variability and both the magnitude and pattern of the projected climate changes.