Gary M. Lovett

Gary M. Lovett

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Gary M. Lovett

Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, NY 12545, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

45Years (1982-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 November 2006 in Ecosystems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FIF Stuart Chapin Iii
F Stuart Chapin Iii
GWG. M. Woodwell
G. M. Woodwell
JRJ. T. Randerson
J. T. Randerson
ERE. B. Rastetter
E. B. Rastetter
GLG. M. Lovett
G. M. Lovett
ESE.-D. Schulze
E.-D. Schulze
Recent projections of climatic change have focused a great deal of scientific and public attention on patterns of carbon (C) cycling as well as its controls, particularly the factors that determine whether an ecosystem is a net source or sink of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). Net ecosystem production (NEP), a central concept in C-cycling research, has been used by scientists to represent two different concepts. We propose that NEP be restricted to just one of its two original definitions—the imbalance between gross primary production (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (ER). We further propose that a new term—net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB)—be applied to the net rate of C accumulation in (or loss from [negative sign]) ecosystems. Net ecosystem carbon balance differs from NEP when C fluxes other than C fixation and respiration occur, or when inorganic C enters or leaves in dissolved form. These fluxes include the leaching loss or lateral transfer of C from the ecosystem; the emission of volatile organic C, methane, and carbon monoxide; and the release of soot and CO2 from fire. Carbon fluxes in addition to NEP are particularly important determinants of NECB over long time scales. However, even over short time scales, they are important in ecosystems such as streams, estuaries, wetlands, and cities. Recent technological advances have led to a diversity of approaches to the measurement of C fluxes at different temporal and spatial scales. These approaches frequently capture different components of NEP or NECB and can therefore be compared across scales only by carefully specifying the fluxes included in the measurements. By explicitly identifying the fluxes that comprise NECB and other components of the C cycle, such as net ecosystem exchange (NEE) and net biome production (NBP), we can provide a less ambiguous framework for understanding and communicating recent changes in the global C cycle.

1 June 2007 in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GLGary M. Lovett
Gary M. Lovett
DBDouglas A. Burns
Douglas A. Burns
CDCharles T. Driscoll
Charles T. Driscoll
JJJennifer C. Jenkins
Jennifer C. Jenkins
MMMyron J. Mitchell
Myron J. Mitchell
RHRichard Haeuber
Richard Haeuber
Environmental monitoring is often criticized as being unscientific, too expensive, and wasteful. While some monitoring studies do suffer from these problems, there are also many highly successful long‐term monitoring programs that have provided important scientific advances and crucial information for environmental policy. Here, we discuss the characteristics of effective monitoring programs, and contend that monitoring should be considered a fundamental component of environmental science and policy. We urge scientists who develop monitoring programs to plan in advance to ensure high data quality, accessibility, and cost‐effectiveness, and we urge government agencies and other funding institutions to make greater commitments to increasing the amount and long‐term stability of funding for environmental monitoring programs.

1 May 1998 in Biogeochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GLG.E. Likens
G.E. Likens
CDCharles T. Driscoll
Charles T. Driscoll
DBD.C. Buso
D.C. Buso
TST.G. Siccama
T.G. Siccama
CJC.E. Johnson
C.E. Johnson
SBScott Bailey
Scott Bailey

10 January 1986 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SLS. E. Lindberg
S. E. Lindberg
GLG. M. Lovett
G. M. Lovett
DRD. D. Richter
D. D. Richter
DJD. W. Johnson
D. W. Johnson
Airborne particles and vapors contributed significantly to the nutrient requirements and the pollutant load of a mixed hardwood forest in the eastern United States. Dry deposition was an important mechanism of atmospheric input to the foliar canopy, occurring primarily by vapor uptake for sulfur, nitrogen, and free acidity and by particle deposition for calcium and potassium. The canopy retained 50 to 70 percent of the deposited free acidity and nitrogen, but released calcium and potassium. Atmospheric deposition supplied 40 and 100 percent of the nitrogen and sulfur requirements, respectively, for the annual woody increment. This contribution was underestimated significantly by standard bulk deposition collectors.

1 January 2006 in BioScience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GLGary M. Lovett
Gary M. Lovett
CCCharles Canham
Charles Canham
MAMary A. Arthur
Mary A. Arthur
KWKathleen C. Weathers
Kathleen C. Weathers
RFRoss D. Fitzhugh
Ross D. Fitzhugh
The forests of eastern North America have been subjected to repeated introductions of exotic insect pests and pathogens over the last century, and se

10 May 2016 in Ecological Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GLGary M. Lovett
Gary M. Lovett
MWMarissa Weiss
Marissa Weiss
ALAndrew M. Liebhold
Andrew M. Liebhold
THThomas P. Holmes
Thomas P. Holmes
BLBrian Leung
Brian Leung
TWTroy Weldy
Troy Weldy
We review and synthesize information on invasions of nonnative forest insects and diseases in the United States, including their ecological and economic impacts, pathways of arrival, distribution within the United States, and policy options for reducing future invasions. Nonnative insects have accumulated in United States forests at a rate of ~2.5 per yr over the last 150 yr. Currently the two major pathways of introduction are importation of live plants and wood packing material such as pallets and crates. Introduced insects and diseases occur in forests and cities throughout the United States, and the problem is particularly severe in theNortheast andUpperMidwest. Nonnative forest pests are the only disturbance agent that has effectively eliminated entire tree species or genera from United States forests within decades. The resulting shift in forest structure and species composition alters ecosystem functions such as productivity, nutrient cycling, and wildlife habitat. In urban and suburban areas, loss of trees from streets, yards, and parks affects aesthetics, property values, shading, stormwater runoff, and human health. The economic damage from nonnative pests is not yet fully known, but is likely in the billions of dollars per year, with the majority of this economic burden borne by municipalities and residential property owners. Current policies for preventing introductions are having positive effects but are insufficient to reduce the influx of pests in the face of burgeoning global trade. Options are available to strengthen the defenses against pest arrival and establishment, including measures taken in the exporting country prior to shipment, measures to ensure clean shipments of plants and wood products, inspections at ports of entry, and post‐entry measures such as quarantines, surveillance, and eradication programs. Improved data collection procedures for inspections, greater data accessibility, and better reporting would support better evaluation of policy effectiveness. Lack of additional action places the nation, local municipalities, and property owners at high risk of further damaging and costly invasions. Adopting stronger policies to reduce establishments of new forest insects and diseases would shift the major costs of control to the source and alleviate the economic burden now borne by homeowners and municipalities.