Chien-Sheng Wu

Chien-Sheng Wu

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Chien-Sheng Wu

Salesforce AI, United States

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2019
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
CWChien-Sheng Wu
Chien-Sheng Wu
AMAndrea Madotto
Andrea Madotto
EHEhsan Hosseini-Asl
Ehsan Hosseini-Asl
CXCaiming Xiong
Caiming Xiong
RSRichard Socher
Richard Socher
PFPascale Fung
Pascale Fung

11 May 2024
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
TCTuhin Chakrabarty
Tuhin Chakrabarty
PLPhilippe Laban
Philippe Laban
DADivyansh Agarwal
Divyansh Agarwal
SMSmaranda Muresan
Smaranda Muresan
CWChien-Sheng Wu
Chien-Sheng Wu
Researchers have argued that large language models (LLMs) exhibit high-quality writing capabilities from blogs to stories. However, evaluating objectively the creativity of a piece of writing is challenging. Inspired by the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking (TTCT) [64], which measures creativity as a process, we use the Consensual Assessment Technique [3] and propose Torrance Test of Creative Writing (TTCW) to evaluate creativity as product. TTCW consists of 14 binary tests organized into the original dimensions of Fluency, Flexibility, Originality, and Elaboration. We recruit 10 creative writers and implement a human assessment of 48 stories written either by professional authors or LLMs using TTCW. Our analysis shows that LLM-generated stories pass 3-10X less TTCW tests than stories written by professionals. In addition, we explore the use of LLMs as assessors to automate the TTCW evaluation, revealing that none of the LLMs positively correlate with the expert assessments.

11 October 2024
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PLPhilippe Laban
Philippe Laban
JVJesse Vig
Jesse Vig
MHMarti Hearst
Marti Hearst
CXCaiming Xiong
Caiming Xiong
CWChien-Sheng Wu
Chien-Sheng Wu
Conversational interfaces powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently become a popular way to obtain feedback during document editing. However, standard chat-based conversational interfaces cannot explicitly surface the editing changes that they suggest. To give the author more control when editing with an LLM, we present InkSync, an editing interface that suggests executable edits directly within the document being edited. Because LLMs are known to introduce factual errors, Inksync also supports a 3-stage approach to mitigate this risk: Warn authors when a suggested edit introduces new information, help authors Verify the new information’s accuracy through external search, and allow a third party to Audit with a-posteriori verification via a trace of all auto-generated content. Two usability studies confirm the effectiveness of InkSync’s components when compared to standard LLM-based chat interfaces, leading to more accurate and more efficient editing, and improved user experience.

25 April 2025
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
XLXingyu Bruce Liu
Xingyu Bruce Liu
SFShitao Fang
Shitao Fang
WSWeiyan Shi
Weiyan Shi
CWChien-Sheng Wu
Chien-Sheng Wu
TITakeo Igarashi
Takeo Igarashi
XCXiang 'Anthony' Chen
Xiang 'Anthony' Chen

1 January 2022
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
LMLidiya Murakhovs’kA
Lidiya Murakhovs’kA
CWChien-Sheng Wu
Chien-Sheng Wu
PLPhilippe Laban
Philippe Laban
TNTong Niu
Tong Niu
WLWenhao Liu
Wenhao Liu
CXCaiming Xiong
Caiming Xiong
Lidiya Murakhovs’ka, Chien-Sheng Wu, Philippe Laban, Tong Niu, Wenhao Liu, Caiming Xiong. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2022. 2022.