Greg Eisenhauer

Greg Eisenhauer

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Greg Eisenhauer

Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 June 2010 in Cluster Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HAHasan Abbasi
Hasan Abbasi
MWMatthew Wolf
Matthew Wolf
GEGreg Eisenhauer
Greg Eisenhauer
SKScott Klasky
Scott Klasky
KSKarsten Schwan
Karsten Schwan
FZFang Zheng
Fang Zheng

1 October 2022
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
SWSean R. Wilkinson
Sean R. Wilkinson
GEGreg Eisenhauer
Greg Eisenhauer
AKAnuj J. Kapadia
Anuj J. Kapadia
KKKathryn Knight
Kathryn Knight
JLJeremy Logan
Jeremy Logan
MWMatthew Wolf
Matthew Wolf
The FAIR principles for scientific data (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) are also relevant to other digital objects such as research software and scientific workflows that operate on scientific data. The FAIR principles can be applied to the data being handled by a scientific workflow as well as the processes, software, and other infrastructure which are necessary to specify and execute a workflow. The FAIR principles were designed as guidelines, rather than rules, that would allow for differences in standards for different communities and for different degrees of compliance. There are many practical considerations which impact the level of FAIR-ness that can actually be achieved, including policies, traditions, and technologies. Because of these considerations, obstacles are often encountered during the workflow lifecycle that trace directly to shortcomings in the implementation of the FAIR principles. Here, we detail some cases, without naming names, in which data and workflows were Findable but otherwise lacking in areas commonly needed and expected by modern FAIR methods, tools, and users. We describe how some of these problems, all of which were overcome successfully, have motivated us to push on systems and approaches for fully FAIR workflows.

10 March 2022
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
FPFranz Poeschel
Franz Poeschel
JEJuncheng E
Juncheng E
WGWilliam F. Godoy
William F. Godoy
NPNorbert Podhorszki
Norbert Podhorszki
SKScott Klasky
Scott Klasky
AHAxel Huebl
Axel Huebl

2 October 2007 in Cluster Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VKVibhore Kumar
Vibhore Kumar
BCBrian F. Cooper
Brian F. Cooper
ZCZhongtang Cai
Zhongtang Cai
GEGreg Eisenhauer
Greg Eisenhauer
KSKarsten Schwan
Karsten Schwan

1 May 1996 in Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GEGreg Eisenhauer
Greg Eisenhauer
KSKarsten Schwan
Karsten Schwan

1 May 2014
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
JHJian Huang
Jian Huang
XZXuechen Zhang
Xuechen Zhang
GEGreg Eisenhauer
Greg Eisenhauer
KSKarsten Schwan
Karsten Schwan
MWMatthew Wolf
Matthew Wolf
SKScott Klasky
Scott Klasky
Collaborative science demands global sharing of scientific data. But it cannot leverage universally accessible cloud-based infrastructures like Drop Box, as those offer limited interfaces and inadequate levels of access bandwidth. We present the Scibox cloud facility for online sharing scientific data. It uses standard cloud storage solutions, but offers a usage model in which high end codes can write/read data to/from the cloud via the APIs they already use for their I/O actions. With Scibox, data upload/download volumes are controlled via Data Reduction-functions stated by end users and applied at the data source, before data is moved, with further gains in efficiency obtained by combining DR-functions to move exactly what is needed by current data consumers. We evaluate Scibox with science applications and their representative data analytics - the GTS fusion and the combustion image processing - demonstrating the potential for ubiquitous data access with substantial reductions in network traffic.