Kim JG, et al. Clin Orthop Surg. 2022 May;14:e43. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios21131

Choi HU, et al. Clin Orthop Surg. 2022 Feb;14:e9. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios21050

The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic review of the definition, ideal surgical method, complications, and prognosis of trans-olecranon fracture dislocations. An electronic search was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and MEDLINE databases. The eligibility criteria included retrospective clinical study and review article in subjects older than 18 years with trans-olecranon fracture dislocations. Trans-olecranon fracture dislocations are defined as fractures in which the stability of the ulnohumeral joint is lost due to the intra-articular fracture of the olecranon without disruption of the proximal radioulnar joint. The seven papers were included that met the eligibility criteria for the quantitative synthesis. Findings indicate that a pre-contoured plate was used in 88.3% of cases (68 of 77 reports), with no reports of complications, suggesting that the pre-contoured 3.5 mm plate is the first choice of treatment. Postoperative mean elbow range of motion for the flexion–extension arc was 121.1° and 146.5° for the pronation-supination arc. Methods for postoperative clinical scores included the Broberg/Morrey rating with a result of excellent or good in 82.9% of cases, the ASES score with a mean of 88.7, and the DASH score with a mean of 11.75. Complications included heterotopic ossification in 21.9% (23/105) of cases, arthrosis in 25.7% (27/105) of cases, nerve damage in 18.1% (19/105) of cases, and osteoarthritis in 14.3% (15/105). With better understanding of the mechanism of injury and proper diagnosis and treatment, findings of the current review suggest a positive outcome. PROSPERO registration No.: CRD42019126568.

With the rising number of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions, revision ACL reconstructions are becoming increasingly common. A revision procedure may be performed to improved knee function, correct instability, and facilitate a return to normal activities. When performing a revision reconstruction, the surgeon decides between a single-stage or a two-stage revision. Two-stage revisions are rarely performed, but are particularly useful when addressing substantial tunnel-widening, active infection, and concomitant knee pathology (e.g., malalignment, other ligamentous injuries, meniscal or chondral lesions). Among these potential scenarios requiring a two-stage revision, tunnel-widening is the most common cause; the first stage involves graft removal, tunnel curettage, and bone grafting, followed by revision ACL reconstruction in the second stage. The purpose of this article is to review the preoperative planning, surgical considerations, rehabilitation, and outcomes of two-stage revision ACL reconstructions and summarize the recent literature outlining treatment results.

Three-dimensional (3D)-printing technology is revolutionizing orthopedic oncology by providing precise, customized solutions for complex bone defects following tumor resection. Traditional modular endoprostheses are prone to complications such as fretting corrosion and implant failure, underscoring the need for innovative approaches. This case series reports on three patients treated with 3D-printed, patient-specific prostheses and cutting guides. Preoperative CT and MRI data were used to design implants tailored to each patient’s anatomy, manufactured using electron beam melting technology with a titanium–aluminum–vanadium alloy. Functional outcomes showed significant improvements: in Case I, AOFAS improved from 71 to 96, and VAS decreased from 6 to 1; in Case II, AOFAS increased from 65 to 79, and VAS decreased from 5 to 3. Radiographic evaluations demonstrated stable prosthesis placement and early evidence of bone integration in Cases I and II, while in Case III, localized disease control was achieved before systemic progression. This case series highlights the transformative potential of 3D-printed prostheses in addressing the challenges of reconstructing anatomically complex defects. By enabling precise tumor resection and improving functional outcomes, this approach can advance current practices in orthopedic oncology. Further research should explore larger cohorts and use cost-effectiveness analyses to validate these findings and facilitate broader clinical adoption.

Kim BS, et al. Clin Orthop Surg. 2022 Jul;14:e48. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios22080