The pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection has left behind a new symptomatology called post COVID-19, or “long COVID”. The pathophysiological mechanisms still remain controversial; however, a link between persistent inflammation and these sequelae has been suggested. Herein, we longitudinally assessed up- and downstream molecules of the NLRP3 inflammasome’s pathway in three study groups: healthy donors (HC, n = 14) and donors with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who had been hospitalized, the latter divided into post COVID-19 (PC, n = 27) and non-post COVID-19 patients (nPC, n = 27) based on the presence or absence of symptomatology at month 6, respectively. Plasma cytokines (IL-1β, IL-3, IL-6, IL-8, IL-18, IP-10, MIG, TNF-α, IFN-γ, MIP-1α and MIP-1β) and total peroxide (TPX) levels were quantified at baseline and at months 1 and 6 after the onset of the infection. Baseline values were the highest for both TPX and cytokines that progressively decreased thereafter the acute infection. IL-1β, MIP-1α and TNF-α at month 1 were the only cytokines that showed a significant difference between nPC and PC. These findings suggest that a persistent inflammatory state one month after the onset of SARS-CoV-2 infection related to specific cytokines (IL-1β, MIP-1α, and TNF-α) might guide to predicting post COVID-19 symptomatology.

Psychological well-being is an important topic in mental health. It is known that university students have a high prevalence of stress and psychological distress, especially students in health sciences fields such as nursing. Despite the growing emergence of this public health issue, research on the factors affecting the mental health of nursing students is limited. To estimate the global psychological health and well-being of Spanish nursing students and its associations with sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. A cross-sectional study was conducted among nursing students. Descriptive analysis, bivariate analysis, and binary regression models were performed. A total of 235 students participated, of which 49.4 % had poor psychological well-being and 51.5 % reported high levels of detrimental emotional symptoms. The main factors related to these unfavorable outcomes were smoking (OR > 5, 95 % C.I. 2–16.30), frequent consumption of fast food (OR > 5, 95 % C.I. 2–16.30), sleeping 2.5, 95 % C.I. 1.46–5.09), and being in the third year of the University study program (OR 2.13, 95 % C.I. 1.051–4.331). These results highlight healthy lifestyle habits as the main factors related to psychological well-being. Additionally, they underscore the need to create psychological support strategies for nursing students.

Background: The interruption of the activity of population-based organized colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs due to the COVID pandemic may have affected their results in terms of the detection of preneoplastic lesions and CRC. We evaluated the impact of the COVID pandemic on the delays, participation, adherence to colonoscopies, lesions detected, and CRC stage at diagnosis in a CRC screening program. Methods: We analyzed all the invitations between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2021. We defined the pandemic period as the period after 12 March 2020. We calculated the delay intervals (successive and all rounds), the rates of participation, adherence to colonoscopy after a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT), and the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy, specifically of CRC and colorectal neoplasia (CRC and/or adenoma), as well as the CRC stage at diagnosis. Results: In the period analyzed, 976,187 invitations were sent (61.0% in the pandemic period), 439,687 FIT were returned (62.4% in the pandemic period) and 23,092 colonoscopies were performed (59.1% in the pandemic period). The colonoscopies were normal in 7378 subjects (32.4%) and CRC was detected in 916 subjects (4.0%). In successive rounds, the delay increased significantly by seven months during the pandemic period (p < 0.001). In all the invitations, the delay from the invitation to the colonoscopy increased significantly by 8 days (p < 0.001). Once adjusted for the confounding variables, the participation in the screening program increased significantly (OR = 1.1; 95% CI = 1.09–1.11), with no changes in the adherence to colonoscopy (OR = 0.9; 95% CI = 0.8–1.0). We found no differences in the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy in terms of CRC (OR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.78–1.02) or colorectal neoplasia (OR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.92–1.03) detection. Finally, we found no differences in the CRC stage at diagnosis (p = 0.2). Conclusions: Although the interruption of the CRC screening program due to the COVID pandemic increased the delays, it did not reduce participation, adherence to colonoscopy, or the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy.