Max CHAFFANET

Dr. Max CHAFFANET

CRCM, INSERM U1068,, Marseille 09, France
+3
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

38Years (1989-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 May 2019 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FBFrançois Bertucci
François Bertucci
CNCharlotte K Y Ng
Charlotte K Y Ng
APAnne Patsouris
Anne Patsouris
NDNathalie Droin
Nathalie Droin
Salvatore PiscuoglioSalvatore Piscuoglio
Salvatore Piscuoglio
FAFabrice André
Fabrice André

2 June 2009 in British Journal of Haematology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VGVéronique Gelsi‐Boyer
Véronique Gelsi‐Boyer
VTVirginie Trouplin
Virginie Trouplin
JAJosé Adélaïde
José Adélaïde
JBJulien Bonansea
Julien Bonansea
NCNathalie Cervera
Nathalie Cervera
DBDaniel Birnbaum
Daniel Birnbaum
Summary: The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are a heterogeneous group of clonal haematological diseases characterized by ineffective haematopoiesis and predisposition to acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). The pathophysiology of MDSs remains unclear. A definition of the molecular biology of MDSs may lead to a better classification, new prognosis indicators and new treatments. We studied a series of 40 MDS/AML samples by high‐density array‐comparative genome hybridization (aCGH). The genome of MDSs displayed a few alterations that can point to candidate genes, which potentially regulate histone modifications and WNT pathways (e.g. ASXL1, ASXL2, UTX, CXXC4, CXXC5, TET2, TET3). To validate some of these candidates we studied the sequence of ASXL1. We found mutations in the ASXL1 gene in four out of 35 MDS patients (11%). To extend these results we searched for mutations of ASXL1 in a series of chronic myelomonocytic leukaemias, a disease classified as MDS/Myeloproliferative disorder, and found mutations in 17 out of 39 patients (43%). These results show that ASXL1 might play the role of a tumour suppressor in myeloid malignancies.

31 December 2014 in Oncotarget
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RSRenaud Sabatier
Renaud Sabatier
PFPascal FINETTI
Pascal FINETTI
Emilie MamessierEmilie Mamessier
Emilie Mamessier
JAJosé Adelaide
José Adelaide
MCMax CHAFFANET
Max CHAFFANET
FBFrançois Bertucci
François Bertucci
Expression of programmed cell death receptor ligand 1 (PDL1) has been scarcely studied in breast cancer. Recently PD1/PDL1-inhibitors have shown promising results in different carcinomas with correlation between PDL1 tumor expression and responses. We retrospectively analyzed PDL1 mRNA expression in 45 breast cancer cell lines and 5,454 breast cancers profiled using DNA microarrays. Compared to normal breast samples, PDL1 expression was upregulated in 20% of clinical samples and 38% of basal tumors. High expression was associated with poor-prognosis features (large tumor size, high grade, ER-negative, PR-negative, ERBB2-positive status, high proliferation, basal and ERBB2-enriched subtypes). PDL1 upregulation was associated with biological signs of strong cytotoxic local immune response. PDL1 upregulation was not associated with survival in the whole population, but was associated with better metastasis-free and overall specific survivals in basal tumors, independently of clinicopathological features. Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was higher in case of PDL1 upregulation (50% versus 21%). In conclusion, PDL1 upregulation, more frequent in basal breast cancers, was associated with increased T-cell cytotoxic immune response. In this aggressive subtype, upregulation was associated with better survival and response to chemotherapy. Reactivation of dormant tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes by PDL1-inhibitors could represent promising strategy in PDL1-upregulated basal breast cancer.

16 July 2009 in Leukemia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NCN Carbuccia
N Carbuccia
AMA Murati
A Murati
VTV Trouplin
V Trouplin
MBM Brecqueville
M Brecqueville
JAJ Adélaïde
J Adélaïde
MMM J Mozziconacci
M J Mozziconacci

15 December 2007 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JAJosé AdélAïdE
José AdélAïdE
PFPascal FINETTI
Pascal FINETTI
IBIsmahane Bekhouche
Ismahane Bekhouche
LRLaetitia Repellini
Laetitia Repellini
JGJeannine Geneix
Jeannine Geneix
MCMax CHAFFANET
Max CHAFFANET
Basal and luminal are two molecular subtypes of breast cancer with opposite histoclinical features. We report a combined, high-resolution analysis of genome copy number and gene expression in primary basal and luminal breast cancers. First, we identified and compared genomic alterations in 45 basal and 48 luminal tumors by using 244K oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). We found various genome gains and losses and rare high-level gene amplifications that may provide therapeutic targets. We show that gain of 10p is a new alteration in basal breast cancer and that a subregion of the 8p12 amplification is specific of luminal tumors. Rare high-level amplifications contained BCL2L2, CCNE, EGFR, FGFR2, IGF1R, NOTCH2, and PIK3CA. Potential gene breaks involved ETV6 and FLT3. Second, we analyzed both aCGH and gene expression profiles for 42 basal and 32 luminal breast cancers. The results support the existence of specific oncogenic pathways in basal and luminal breast cancers, involving several potential oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes (TSG). In basal tumors, 73 candidate oncogenes were identified in chromosome regions 1q21-23, 10p14, and 12p13 and 28 candidate TSG in regions 4q32-34 and 5q11-23. In luminal breast cancers, 33 potential oncogenes were identified in 1q21-23, 8p12-q21, 11q13, and 16p12-13 and 61 candidate TSG in 16q12-13, 16q22-24, and 17p13. HORMAD1 (P = 6.5 × 10−5) and ZNF703 (P = 7 × 10−4) were the most significant basal and luminal potential oncogenes, respectively. Finally, among 10p candidate oncogenes associated with basal subtype, we validated CDC123/C10orf7 protein as a basal marker. [Cancer Res 2007;67(24):11565–75]

29 September 2010 in British Journal of Haematology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VGVéronique Gelsi‐Boyer
Véronique Gelsi‐Boyer
VTVirginie Trouplin
Virginie Trouplin
JRJulien Roquain
Julien Roquain
JAJosé Adélaïde
José Adélaïde
NCNadine Carbuccia
Nadine Carbuccia
DBDaniel Birnbaum
Daniel Birnbaum
Summary: Chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) is a haematological disease currently classified in the category of myelodysplastic syndromes/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) because of its dual clinical and biological presentation. The molecular biology of CMML is poorly characterized. We studied a series of 53 CMML samples including 31 cases of myeloproliferative form (MP‐CMML) and 22 cases of myelodysplastic forms (MD‐CMML) using array‐comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) and sequencing of 13 candidate genes including ASXL1, CBL, FLT3, IDH1, IDH2, JAK2, KRAS, NPM1, NRAS, PTPN11, RUNX1, TET2 and WT1. Mutations in ASXL1 and in the genes associated with proliferation (CBL, FLT3, PTPN11, NRAS) were mainly found in MP‐CMML cases. Mutations of ASXL1 correlated with an evolution toward an acutely transformed state: all CMMLs that progressed to acute phase were mutated and none of the unmutated patients had evolved to acute leukaemia. The overall survival of ASXL1 mutated patients was lower than that of unmutated patients.