Raphael Diego Comesanha e Silva

Mr. Raphael Diego Comesanha e Silva

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 February 2023 in IEEE Journal on Miniaturization for Air and Space Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJoão Cláudio Elsen Barcellos
João Cláudio Elsen Barcellos
ASAnderson Wedderhoff Spengler
Anderson Wedderhoff Spengler
Laio Oriel SemanLaio Oriel Seman
Laio Oriel Seman
Raphael Diego Comesanha e SilvaRaphael Diego Comesanha e Silva
Raphael Diego Comesanha e Silva
HRHéctor Pettenghi Roldán
Héctor Pettenghi Roldán
Eduardo BezerraEduardo Bezerra
Eduardo Bezerra
Recent trends indicate an increase in the number of small satellite missions, which can be developed more quickly and at a lower cost than traditional satellites. This has led to a growing interest in university-based satellite development, despite a lack of expertise in the space field, which has resulted in a high failure rate for such missions. To address this issue, the implementation of robust and reliable verification and validation (V&V) methods has become essential, and it has been demonstrated that the use of a FlatSat during the V&V campaign increases reliability. Despite the significance of FlatSat, there is a dearth of information on the platforms used to implement it, as well as a classification scheme for locating them. This article contributes to bridging this gap by conducting a systematic mapping of 65 works that were selected based on specific criteria and subsequently analyzed. The primary characteristics of the platforms are enumerated, and a new classification for FlatSat platforms into Raw, Bridge, Dock, and Modular is proposed. In order to provide a comprehensive understanding of the topic, the principal tests conducted on these platforms were also covered.

28 January 2026 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Raphael Diego Comesanha e SilvaRaphael Diego Comesanha e Silva
Raphael Diego Comesanha e Silva
TMThiago Martins
Thiago Martins
JBJoão Paulo Bedretchuk
João Paulo Bedretchuk
VKVictor Noster Kürschner
Victor Noster Kürschner
ASAnderson Wedderhoff Spengler
Anderson Wedderhoff Spengler
Extended Kalman Filters (EKFs) are widely employed for attitude estimation using Magnetic and Inertial Measurement Units (MIMUs) in battery-powered sensing systems. In such applications, energy availability influences system operation, yet battery state information is commonly treated by external supervisory mechanisms rather than being integrated into the estimation process. This work presents an EKF-based formulation in which the battery State of Charge (SOC) is explicitly included as a state variable, allowing joint estimation of attitude and energy state within a single filtering framework. SOC dynamics are modeled using a low-complexity estimator based on terminal voltage and current measurements, while attitude estimation is performed using a Simplified Extended Kalman Filter (SEKF) tailored for embedded MIMU-based applications. The proposed approach was evaluated through numerical simulations under constant and time-varying load profiles representative of low-power electronic devices. The results indicate that the inclusion of SOC estimation does not affect the attitude estimation performance of the original SEKF, while SOC estimation errors remain below 8% for the evaluated load conditions with power consumption of approximately 0.1 W, consistent with wearable and small autonomous electronic platforms. By incorporating energy state estimation directly into the filtering structure, rather than treating it as an external supervisory task, the proposed formulation offers a unified estimation approach suitable for embedded MIMU-based systems with limited computational and energy resources.

26 February 2026 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TMThiago Martins
Thiago Martins
JBJoão Paulo Bedretchuk
João Paulo Bedretchuk
VKVictor Noster Kürschner
Victor Noster Kürschner
Raphael Diego Comesanha e SilvaRaphael Diego Comesanha e Silva
Raphael Diego Comesanha e Silva
ASAnderson Wedderhoff Spengler
Anderson Wedderhoff Spengler
KPKleber Vieira De Paiva
Kleber Vieira De Paiva
Accurate classification of two-phase gas-liquid flows is essential for reliable monitoring and control in industrial systems. Although several optical and machine-learning studies have been reported, most still focus on single wavelengths or isolated feature domains, lacking an integrated methodology that links sensor physics, feature extraction, and machine learning. This study addresses this gap by proposing the Multi-Feature Multi-Domain (MFMD) framework and its derived Optimal Feature and Method Selection (OFMS) guideline, providing a unified methodology to achieve high accuracy and model parsimony. The methodology was experimentally validated in horizontal air–water flows (five patterns: bubble, plug, slug, stratified, and wavy) using collimated near-infrared (NIR) sensors operating at 850, 980, and 1310 nm, selected for their distinct absorption sensitivities to interfacial, hybrid, and volumetric characteristics. Features were extracted from the time (Probability Density Function, PDF), frequency (Power Spectral Density, PSD), and time-frequency (Discrete Wavelet Transform, DWT) domains. This multi-domain feature set was processed by comparing feature selection (Recursive Feature Elimination, RFE) with transformation methods (Linear Discriminant Analysis, LDA, and Principal Component Analysis, PCA). Classification was performed using Support Vector Machine (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), Random Forest (RF), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). Results demonstrate that multi-wavelength fusion is essential for reliable flow discrimination. The RFE-based approach achieved 100% accuracy when combining all data sources, while supervised LDA significantly outperformed PCA by enhancing class separability. The resulting OFMS guideline consolidates these findings into a practical tool for selecting the most effective feature–classifier strategy, whether prioritizing maximum accuracy or a more parsimonious machine learning model.