Considering the lack of questionnaires that propose to evaluate parental satisfaction with the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) in Brazil, this study aimed to carry out the translation of the EMPATHIC-N questionnaire into Brazilian Portuguese, the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of its contents. The translation and cultural adaptation of the questionnaire was carried out according to the protocol established by the Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation Group of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) in 2005. The validation of the content was carried out by a panel of experts, who evaluated each item from "very irrelevant" to "very relevant". Items with a mean Likert scale value <3.5 were excluded. Cronbach's alpha of the domains was calculated. The questionnaire was submitted to two pilot tests with mothers of newborns admitted to the NICU of the study, after which some terms were modified to achieve global understanding. Cronbach's alpha remained above 0.7 in all items. The tool resulting from the translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the EMPATHIC-N questionnaire showed to be adequate to assess satisfaction of parents of newborns admitted to the NICU in Brazil.

Background Studies comparing the frequency of different mental health conditions across different settings and evaluating their association with parental participation in newborn care are lacking. We aimed at evaluating the frequency of parental stress, anxiety and depression, along with the level of participation in newborn care, among parents of newborns in Italy, Brazil and Tanzania. Methods Parental stress, anxiety, depression and participation in care were assessed prospectively in parents of newborns in eight neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) utilising: the Parental Stressor Scale in NICU (PSS:NICU); the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and EPDS-Anxiety subscale (EPDS-A); the Index of Parental Participation in NICU (IPP-NICU). Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. Results Study outcomes were assessed on 742 parents (Brazil=327, Italy=191, Tanzania=224). Observed scores suggested a very high frequency of stress, anxiety and depression, with an overall estimated frequency of any of the mental health condition of 65.1%, 52.9% and 58.0% in Brazil, Italy, Tanzania, respectively (p<0.001). EPDS scores indicating depression (cut-off: ≥13 for Brazil and Tanzania, ≥12 for Italy) were significantly more frequent in Tanzania (52.3%) when compared with either Brazil (35.8%) and Italy (33.3%) (p<0.001). Parental participation in care was also significantly higher in Tanzania (median IPP-NICU=24) than in the other two countries (median=21 for Brazil, 18 for Italy, p<0.001). Severe stress (PSS:NICU ≥4) was significantly more frequently reported in Brazil (22.6%), compared with Italy (4.7%) and Tanzania (0%, p<0.001). Factors independently associated with either parental stress, anxiety or depression varied by country, and a significant association with parental participation in care was lacking. Conclusions Study findings suggest that parental stress, anxiety and depression are extremely frequent in NICUs in all countries despite diversity in the setting, and requiring immediate action. Further studies should explore the appropriate level of parental participation in care in different settings.

To assess the predictive value of selected growth phenotypes for neonatal morbidity and mortality in preterm infants < 30 weeks and to compare them with INTERGROWTH-21^st (IG21). Retrospective analysis of data from the Brazilian Neonatal Research Network (BNRN) database for very low birth weight (VLBW) at 20 public tertiary-care university hospitals. Outcome: the composite neonatal morbidity and mortality (CNMM) consisted of in-hospital death, oxygen use at 36 weeks, intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or 4, and Bell stage 2 or 3 necrotizing enterocolitis. Selected growth phenotypes: small-for-gestational-age (SGA) defined as being < 3^rd (SGA3) or 10^th (SGA10) percentiles of BW, and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) as being > 97^th percentile of BW. Stunting as being < 3^rd percentile of the length and wasting as being < 3^rd percentile of BMI. Single and multiple log-binomial regression models were fitted to estimate the relative risks of CNMM, comparing them to IG21. 4,072 infants were included. The adjusted relative risks of CNMM associated with selected growth phenotypes were (BNRN/IG21): 1.45 (0.92–2.31)/1.60 (1.27–2.02) for SGA; 0.90 (0.55–1.47)/1.05 (0.55–1.99) for LGA; 1.65 (1.08–2.51)/1.58 (1.28–1.96) for stunting; and 1.48 (1.02–2.17) for wasting. Agreement between the two references was variable. The growth phenotypes had good specificity (>95%) and positive predictive value (70-90%), with poor sensitivity and low negative predictive value. The BNRN phenotypes at birth differed markedly from the IG21 standard and showed poor accuracy in predicting adverse neonatal outcomes.

The Brazilian Neonatal Resuscitation Program releases guidelines based on local interpretation of international consensus on science and treatment recommendations. We aimed to analyze whether guidelines for preterm newborns were applied to practice in the 20 Brazilian Network on Neonatal Research centers of this middle-income country. Prospectively collected data from 2014 to 2020 were analyzed for 8514 infants born at 23^0/7 to 31^6/7 weeks’ gestation. The frequency of procedures was evaluated by gestational age (GA) category, including use of a thermal care bundle, positive pressure ventilation (PPV), PPV with a T-piece resuscitator, maximum fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio₂) concentration during PPV, tracheal intubation, chest compressions and medications, and use of continuous positive airway pressure in the delivery room. Logistic regression, adjusted by center and year, was used to estimate the probability of receiving recommended treatment. For 3644 infants 23 to 27 weeks’ GA and 4870 infants 28 to 31 weeks’ GA, respectively, the probability of receiving care consistent with guidelines per year increased, including thermal care (odds ratio [OR], 1.52 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.44–1.61] and 1.45 [1.38–1.52]) and PPV with a T-piece (OR, 1.45 [95% CI 1.37–1.55] and 1.41 [1.32–1.51]). The probability of receiving PPV with Fio₂ 1.00 decreased equally in both GA groups (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86–0.93). Between 2014 and 2020, the resuscitation guidelines for newborns <32 weeks’ GA on thermal care, PPV with a T-piece resuscitator, and decreased use of Fio₂ 1.00 were translated into clinical practice.

Background/Objectives: During the COVID-19 pandemic, neonatal care units had to change protocols, and little is known about its impact on parents’ mental health. This study aimed to evaluate parental stress, depression, anxiety, and participation in neonatal care in a Brazilian neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and observe changes over two different periods of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Cross-sectional study comparing stress, depression, anxiety, and participation in neonatal care levels between two time periods: T1, high COVID-19 incidence (May 2020 to July 2020 and March 2021 to June 2021) and T2, low COVID-19 incidence (August 2020 to February 2021 and July 2021 to December 2021). High COVID-19 incidence was considered more than 40 confirmed COVID-19-related deaths/day. Validate tools used were the Parental Stressor Scale in NICU (PSS:NICU); the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS); the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale-Anxiety subscale (EPDS-A); the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI); and the Index of Parental Participation (IPP). Stress level was pre-defined as the primary outcome. Results: 106 parents (98 mothers, 8 fathers) and 111 newborns were included. Overall, 51.9% of parents had a PSS:NICU score ≥ 3 (relevant stress level), 28.3% had an EPDS-A ≥ 6 (indicating anxiety), and 33.0% had an EPDS > 13 (indicating depression). At least one condition was present in 69 (65%) parents, while the three conditions were simultaneously observed in 17 (16%) parents. No significant differences were observed in the frequencies of stress, depression, or anxiety between the two periods. However, median stress occurrence level (SOL) was higher in T1 when compared to T2 (3.24 vs. 2.68; p = 0.02), mainly due to “Parental role alteration” (3.80 vs. 3.17; p = 0.046). The level of parental participation was not different between the two time periods (p = 0.23). Correlations between stress and both depression and anxiety scores were weak. Parental participation was not significantly correlated to other scores. Conclusions: Elevated levels of stress, depression, and anxiety were observed among NICU parents during both high and low COVID-19 incidence periods. High COVID-19 incidence seems to have particularly influenced stress levels related to parental role alteration. These findings highlight the importance of regularly assessing parental mental health in NICU settings.