Ground-based microwave radiometers are increasingly used in operational meteorology and nowcasting. These instruments continuously measure the spectra of downwelling atmospheric radiation in the range 20–60 GHz used for the retrieval of tropospheric temperature and water vapor profiles. Spectroscopic uncertainty is an important part of the retrieval error budget, as it leads to systematic bias. In this study, we analyze the difference between observed and simulated microwave spectra obtained from more than four years of microwave and radiosonde observations over Nizhny Novgorod (56.2° N, 44° E). We focus on zenith-measured and elevation-scanning data in clear-sky conditions. The simulated spectra are calculated by a radiative transfer model with the use of radiosonde profiles and different absorption models, corresponding to the latest spectroscopy research. In the case of zenith-measurements, we found a systematic bias (up to ~2 K) of simulated spectra at 51–54 GHz. The sign of bias depends on the absorption model. A thorough investigation of the error budget points to a spectroscopic nature of the observed differences. The dependence of the results on the elevation angle and absorption model can be explained by the basic properties of radiative transfer and by cloud contamination at elevation angles.

The precise calculation of atmospheric absorption in a microwave band is highly important for atmospheric remote-sensing with ground-based and satellite-borne radiometers, as it is a key element in procedures for temperature, humidity or trace gas concentration retrieval. The accuracy of the absorption model directly affects the accuracy of the retrieved information and reliability of the resulting forecasts. In this study, we analyze the difference between observed and simulated microwave spectra obtained from more than four years of microwave and radiosonde observations over Nizhny Novgorod (56.2°N, 44°E). We focus on zenith-measured microwave data in the 20–60 GHz frequency range in clear-sky conditions. The use of a conventional absorption model in simulations leads to a significant difference in frequency channels within the 51–54 GHz range, while calculations employing a more accurate model based on the Energy Corrected Sudden (ECS) formalism for molecular oxygen absorption reduces the difference several-fold.