Ethan Ludmir

Dr. Ethan Ludmir

MD Anderson cancer center
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 August 2021 in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EFEmmanouil Fokas
Emmanouil Fokas
AAAne Appelt
Ane Appelt
RGRobert G.T. Glynne-Jones
Robert G.T. Glynne-Jones
GBGeerard Beets
Geerard Beets
RPRodrigo Perez
Rodrigo Perez
CRClaus Rödel
Claus Rödel

1 December 2019 in JAMA Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ELEthan Ludmir
Ethan Ludmir
WMWalker Mainwaring
Walker Mainwaring
TLTimothy A. Lin
Timothy A. Lin
AMAustin B. Miller
Austin B. Miller
AJAmit Jethanandani
Amit Jethanandani
CFClifton David Fuller
Clifton David Fuller
As the population in the United States ages, cancer incidence is expected to increase; by 2030 it is estimated that 70% of all new cancer diagnoses will be in patients 65 years and older, emphasizing the increasing relevance of geriatric populations in oncology.1 Seminal data from 15 to 20 years ago demonstrated marked underrepresentation of older patients with cancer enrolled on clinical trials funded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI).2-4 Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) often establish the standard of care; with underrepresentation of older patients, concerns regarding the applicability of trial results persist.5-7 We hypothesized that age disparities continue to exist for patients with cancer enrolled in clinical trials. Therefore, we examined age disparities among modern oncologic RCTs for breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer (the 4 most common disease sites), characterizing the differences between trial participants and the population by disease site. We identified specific trial-related factors associated with heightened age disparities (including industry sponsorship) and asked whether age disparities were improving with time.

10 March 2017 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ELEthan Ludmir
Ethan Ludmir
MPManisha Palta
Manisha Palta
CWChristopher G. Willett
Christopher G. Willett
BCBrian G. Czito
Brian G. Czito

10 November 2024 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ELEthan Ludmir
Ethan Ludmir
ASAlexander Sherry
Alexander Sherry
BFBryan M. Fellman
Bryan M. Fellman
SLSuyu Liu
Suyu Liu
TBTharakeswara Bathala
Tharakeswara Bathala
CTChad Tang
Chad Tang
PURPOSE: The EXTEND trial tested the hypothesis that adding comprehensive metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) to chemotherapy would improve progression-free survival (PFS) over chemotherapy alone among patients with oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: EXTEND (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03599765 ) is a multicenter, phase II basket trial randomly assigning patients with ≤five metastases 1:1 to MDT plus systemic therapy versus systemic therapy. Disease progression was defined by radiologic criteria (RECIST v1.1), clinical progression, or death. The primary end point was PFS in the per-protocol population, evaluated after all patients achieved at least 6 months of follow-up. Exploratory end points included systemic immune response measures. RESULTS: Between March 19, 2019, and February 13, 2023, 41 patients were randomly assigned and 40 were eligible for the primary analysis of PFS (19 patients in the MDT arm; 21 patients in the control arm). At a median follow-up time of 17 months, the median PFS time was 10.3 months (95% CI, 4.6 to 14.0) in the MDT arm versus 2.5 months (95% CI, 1.7 to 5.1) in the control arm. PFS was significantly improved by the addition of MDT to systemic therapy ( P = .030 for stratified log-rank test) with a hazard ratio of 0.43 (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.94). No grade ≥3 or greater adverse events related to MDT were observed. Systemic immune activation events were associated with MDT and correlated with improved PFS. CONCLUSION: This study supports the addition of MDT to systemic therapy for patients with oligometastatic PDAC. Induction of systemic immunity is a possible mechanism of benefit. These results warrant confirmatory trials to refine treatment strategy and provide external validation.

7 July 2020 in JNCI Cancer Spectrum
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SGStephen R Grant
Stephen R Grant
TLTimothy A Lin
Timothy A Lin
AMAustin B Miller
Austin B Miller
WMWalker Mainwaring
Walker Mainwaring
AEAndres F Espinoza
Andres F Espinoza
ELEthan Ludmir
Ethan Ludmir
Although improving representation of racial and ethnic groups in United States clinical trials has been a focus of federal initiatives for nearly 3 decades, the status of racial and ethnic minority enrollment on cancer trials is largely unknown. We used a broad collection of phase 3 cancer trials derived from ClinicalTrials.gov to evaluate racial and ethnic enrollment among US cancer trials. The difference in incidence by race and ethnicity was the median absolute difference between trial and corresponding Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Using a cohort of 168 eligible trials, median difference in incidence by race and ethnicity was +6.8% for Whites (interquartile range [IQR] = +1.8% to +10.1%; P < .001 by Wilcoxon signed-rank test comparing median difference in incidence by race and ethnicity to a value of 0), -2.6% for Blacks (IQR = -5.1% to +1.2%; P = .004), -4.7% for Hispanics (IQR = -7.5% to -0.3%; P < .001), and -4.7% for Asians (IQR = -5.7% to -3.3%; P < .001). These data demonstrate overrepresentation of Whites, with continued underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minority subgroups.

20 July 2020 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DPDario Pasalic
Dario Pasalic
GMGwendolyn J. McGinnis
Gwendolyn J. McGinnis
CFC. David Fuller
C. David Fuller
AGAaron J Grossberg
Aaron J Grossberg
VVVivek Verma
Vivek Verma
ELEthan Ludmir
Ethan Ludmir