Elisa Negri

Prof. Elisa Negri

Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Lombardy, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2017 in Procedia Manufacturing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Elisa NegriElisa Negri
Elisa Negri
LFLuca Fumagalli
Luca Fumagalli
MMMarco Macchi
Marco Macchi

31 August 2017
Verified
Book Chapter
Open access
PDF file
ACAnna De Carolis
Anna De Carolis
MMMarco Macchi
Marco Macchi
Elisa NegriElisa Negri
Elisa Negri
STSergio Terzi
Sergio Terzi
“The most profound technologies are those that disappear… They weave themselves into the fabric of everyday life until they are indistinguishable from it” wrote computer scientist and visionary Mark Weiser nearly 25 years ago in his essay “The Computer for the 21st Century.” It turns out he was right: in the age of “Industry 4.0”, digital technologies are the core driver for the manufacturing transformation. In fact, the introduction of such technologies allows companies to find solutions capable to turn increasing complexity into opportunities for ensuring sustainable competitiveness and profitable growth. Nonetheless, the effective implementation in manufacturing still depends on the state of practice: it may slow down, or even worst, may prevent from implementation. Indeed, we assume that a minimum level of capabilities is required before implementing the digital technologies in a company. Based on this concern, our research question is “are manufacturing companies ready to go digital?”. This paper wants to illustrate a “tool” to answer this question by building a maturity assessment method to measure the digital readiness of manufacturing firms. Based on the inspiring principles of the CMMI (Capability Maturity Model Integration) framework, we propose a model to set the ground for the investigation of company digital maturity. Different dimensions are used to assess 5 areas in which manufacturing key processes can be grouped: (1) design and engineering, (2) production management, (3) quality management, (4) maintenance management and (5) logistics management. Thus, the maturity model provides a normative description of practices in each area and dimension, building a ranked order of practices (i.e. from low to high maturity). A scoring method for maturity assessment is subsequently defined, in order to identify the criticalities in implementing the digital transformation and to subsequently drive the improvement of the whole system. The method should be useful both to manufacturing companies and researchers interested in understanding the digital readiness level in the state of practice.

1 January 2018 in IFAC-PapersOnLine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMarco Macchi
Marco Macchi
IRIrene Roda
Irene Roda
Elisa NegriElisa Negri
Elisa Negri
LFLuca Fumagalli
Luca Fumagalli

1 July 2020 in Journal of Manufacturing Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Elisa NegriElisa Negri
Elisa Negri
SBStefano Berardi
Stefano Berardi
LFLuca Fumagalli
Luca Fumagalli
MMMarco Macchi
Marco Macchi

15 October 2020 in Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Elisa NegriElisa Negri
Elisa Negri
VPVibhor Pandhare
Vibhor Pandhare
LCLaura Cattaneo
Laura Cattaneo
JSJaskaran Singh
Jaskaran Singh
MMMarco Macchi
Marco Macchi
Jay LeeJay Lee
Jay Lee
Research on scheduling problems is an evergreen challenge for industrial engineers. The growth of digital technologies opens the possibility to collect and analyze great amount of field data in real-time, representing a precious opportunity for an improved scheduling activity. Thus, scheduling under uncertain scenarios may benefit from the possibility to grasp the current operating conditions of the industrial equipment in real-time and take them into account when elaborating the best production schedules. To this end, the article proposes a proof-of-concept of a simheuristics framework for robust scheduling applied to a Flow Shop Scheduling Problem. The framework is composed of genetic algorithms for schedule optimization and discrete event simulation and is synchronized with the field through a Digital Twin (DT) that employs an Equipment Prognostics and Health Management (EPHM) module. The contribution of the EPHM module inside the DT-based framework is the real time computation of the failure probability of the equipment, with data-driven statistical models that take sensor data from the field as input. The viability of the framework is demonstrated in a flow shop application in a laboratory environment.

1 September 2016 in Computers in Industry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Elisa NegriElisa Negri
Elisa Negri
Luca FumagalliLuca Fumagalli
Luca Fumagalli
MGMarco Garetti
Marco Garetti
LTLetizia Tanca
Letizia Tanca