Rutile decomposition by sulfuric acid, including the formation of two salts, Ti(SO₄)₂/TiOSO₄, is thermodynamically modelled. It is shown that TiO₂ can spontaneously dissolve in H₂SO₄ solutions. However, titania is considered as an inert (ballast) phase component of titanium-containing raw materials due to the decelerated separate nature of such chemical transformations. It is concluded that the hampered related kinetics of dissolution can be attributed to the lability of Ti(IV) cations/the specific engineered features of the hierarchical crystalline structure. It is suggested that the breaking of Ti–O–Ti bonds without additional mechanical strains in crystal lattice geometry becomes more advantageous when smaller negative anions/fluoride ions can be used. The analysis of sulfate-fluoride extraction leaching of titanium confirmed that a decrease in the Gibbs energy in the presence of F occurs. It is indicated by kinetic research studies that the addition of corrosive sodium reagent (NaF) reduces the activation by 45 kJ/mol, which results in intensification. A mechanism is proposed for the interactions involving the Ti–O–Ti cleavage on the surface/the H₂SO₄-induced Ti dioxide degradation on the sites of defects. Moreover, F acts as a homogeneous/heterogeneous bifunctional catalyst.

Alkanes, although not amphiphilic molecules, adsorb at the surface of water drops from the vapour phase. At the drop surface of the surfactant solution formed in hexane saturated air, a competitive adsorption of surfactant and hexane is observed. Experiments with drop profile analysis tensiometry are performed to quantify the adsorption of the non-ionic surfactant C₁₀EO₈ at the water/hexane vapour interface. The equilibrium surface tension isotherm shows a remarkable shift towards much lower tensions, even much below those values reached by micellar C₁₀EO₈ solutions. A thermodynamic model allows the description of the mixed hexane/C₁₀EO₈ adsorption layer at the water/vapour interface quite well. The incorporation of hexane molecules also significantly increases the dilation elasticity values, although the layers of hexane alone show only very low dilational elasticities and high viscosities. While a diffusional exchange of matter theory describes the visco-elasticity of the surfactant very well, it fails for the mixed adsorption layer.

In drop profile analysis tensiometry, the ratio of drop surfaces area S to volume V is large, i.e., S/V >> 1. In such a case, the concentration of a surfactant within the drop bulk decreases due to adsorption at the drop surface. In contrast, in bubble profile analysis tensiometry, we have S/V << 1 so that depletion due to adsorption is negligible. A protocol is presented to determine the correct adsorption parameters of surfactants from surface tension data measured by bubble and drop profile analysis tensiometry. The procedure is applied to experimental data measured for selected surfactants of different adsorption activities: C₁₀OH, CTAB, Tween 20, and the equimolar mixture SDS + DoTAB. The results show that for surfactants with higher surface activity, the differences between the surface tensions measured with the drops and bubbles profile analysis tensiometry, respectively, are larger, while for less surface-active surfactants, such as SDS, the results obtained from drop and bubble profile experiments are very close. The correction procedure is based on the same set of adsorption parameters used to fit both the experimental data obtained from drop-based measurements (which involve the depletion effects) and those data measured in a way that depletion effects are negligible.

The dynamic and equilibrium properties of adsorption layers of poly (oxyethylene) alkyl ether (C_nEO_m) can be well described by the reorientation model. In its classical version, it assumes two adsorption states; however, there are obviously surfactants that can adsorb in more than two possible conformations. The experimental data for C₁₄EO₄ and C₁₄EO₈ (dynamic and equilibrium surface tensions and surface dilational visco-elasticity as measured by bubble profile analysis tensiometry) are used to verify if a reorientation model with more than two possible adsorption states can better describe the complete set data of C_nEO_m adsorption layers at the water/air interface. The proposed refined theoretical model allows s different states of the adsorbing molecules at the interface. The comparison between the model and experiment demonstrates that, for C₁₄EO₄, the assumption of s = 5 adsorption states provides a much better agreement than for s = 2, while for C₁₄EO₈, a number of s = 10 adsorption states allows an optimum data description.

Drop profile analysis tensiometry is applied to determine the distribution coefficient of a nonionic surfactant for a water/hexane system. The basic idea is to measure the interfacial tension isotherm in two configurations: a hexane drop immersed in the surfactant aqueous solutions at different bulk concentrations, and a water drop immersed into a hexane solution of the same surfactant. Both types of experiments lead to an isotherm for the equilibrium interfacial tensions with the same slope but with a concentration shift between them. This shift refers exactly to the value of the distribution coefficient.