Felice Carlo Ponzo

Prof. Felice Carlo Ponzo

University of Basilicata, School of Engineering, Viadell’AteneoLucano 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2005 in Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MDMauro Dolce
Mauro Dolce
DCDonatello Cardone
Donatello Cardone
Felice Carlo PonzoFelice Carlo Ponzo
Felice Carlo Ponzo
CVClaudio Valente
Claudio Valente

27 September 2006 in Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MDMauro Dolce
Mauro Dolce
DCDonatello Cardone
Donatello Cardone
Felice Carlo PonzoFelice Carlo Ponzo
Felice Carlo Ponzo

1 October 2004 in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMM. Mucciarelli
M. Mucciarelli
AMA. Masi
A. Masi
MGMaria Rosaria Gallipoli
Maria Rosaria Gallipoli
PHP. Harabaglia
P. Harabaglia
Marco VonaMarco Vona
Marco Vona
MDM. Dolce
M. Dolce
During the 2002 seismic sequence in Molise (Italy), the town of Bonefro suffered moderate damage (I-MCS = VII) except for two reinforced concrete (RC) buildings. These buildings are located on soft sediments, close to each other and very similar in design and construction. The main difference is the height: the most damaged one (European Macroseismic Scale damage 4) has four stories, whereas the less damaged (EMS damage 2) has three stories. The M 5.4 shock on 31 October damaged both of them. The second shock on I November (M 5.3) increased the damage on the four-story building substantially, just while a 5-min. seismic recording was taken. We analyzed the recorded data by four different techniques: short-time fourier transform (STFT), wavelet transform (WT), horizontal-to vertical spectral ratio (HVSR), and horizontal-to-vertical moving window ratio (HVMWR). All the results agree upon the estimate of the main building frequency before the second shock and upon the shift of frequency due to damage. All the fundamental frequencies (pre-, during, and postdamage) are in the range 2.5-1.25 Hz. The fundamental frequency of the less damaged building was estimated at about 4 Hz.\ud \ud To test if the soil-building resonance effect could have increased the damage, we also evaluated the soil fundamental frequency by three different techniques: noise HVSR, strong motion HVSR of seven aftershocks, and ID modeling based on a velocity profile derived from noise analysis of surface waves (NASW) measurements. The results are again in good agreement, showing that resonance frequencies of the soil and of the more damaged building are very close

11 April 2017 in Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Felice Carlo PonzoFelice Carlo Ponzo
Felice Carlo Ponzo
Antonio Di CesareAntonio Di Cesare
Antonio Di Cesare
GLGianmarco Leccese
Gianmarco Leccese
DNDomenico Nigro
Domenico Nigro

28 January 2012 in Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Rocco DitommasoRocco Ditommaso
Rocco Ditommaso
MMMarco Mucciarelli
Marco Mucciarelli
Felice Carlo PonzoFelice Carlo Ponzo
Felice Carlo Ponzo

11 July 2013 in Journal of Earthquake Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TSTobias Smith
Tobias Smith
Felice Carlo PonzoFelice Carlo Ponzo
Felice Carlo Ponzo
Antonio Di CesareAntonio Di Cesare
Antonio Di Cesare
SPStefano Pampanin
Stefano Pampanin
DCDavid Carradine
David Carradine
DNDomenico Nigro
Domenico Nigro
This article describes tests investigating a feasible source of passive damping for post-tensioned glue-laminated (glulam) timber structures. This innovative structural system adapts precast concrete PRESSS technology [Priestley et al., 1999] to engineered wood products combining the use of post-tensioned tendons with large timber members. Current testing is aimed at further improvement of the system through additional energy dissipation. Testing has favorably compared glue-laminated timber (not previously implemented in this way) with laminated veneer lumber (LVL) used in New Zealand. After initial benchmark testing with post-tensioning only, a simple, minimally invasive and replaceable type of hysteretic damper was added.