david holder

Prof. david holder

Professor of Biophysics and Clinical Neurophysiology
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

40Years (1987-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 1996 in Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KBK. G. Boone
K. G. Boone
DHdavid holder
david holder

1 January 2016 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KAKirill Y. Aristovich
Kirill Y. Aristovich
BPBrett C. Packham
Brett C. Packham
HKHwan Koo
Hwan Koo
GSGustavo Sato dos Santos
Gustavo Sato dos Santos
AMAndy McEvoy
Andy McEvoy
DHdavid holder
david holder
Imaging of neuronal depolarization in the brain is a major goal in neuroscience, but no technique currently exists that could image neural activity over milliseconds throughout the whole brain. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is an emerging medical imaging technique which can produce tomographic images of impedance changes with non-invasive surface electrodes. We report EIT imaging of impedance changes in rat somatosensory cerebral cortex with a resolution of 2ms and <200μm during evoked potentials using epicortical arrays with 30 electrodes. Images were validated with local field potential recordings and current source-sink density analysis. Our results demonstrate that EIT can image neural activity in a volume 7×5×2mm in somatosensory cerebral cortex with reduced invasiveness, greater resolution and imaging volume than other methods. Modeling indicates similar resolutions are feasible throughout the entire brain so this technique, uniquely, has the potential to image functional connectivity of cortical and subcortical structures.

1 February 2001 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TTTom Tidswella
Tom Tidswella
AGAdam Gibsona
Adam Gibsona
RBRichard H. Bayford
Richard H. Bayford
DHdavid holder
david holder

1 October 2003 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAndrew P Bagshaw
Andrew P Bagshaw
ALAdam D Liston
Adam D Liston
RBRichard H Bayford
Richard H Bayford
ATAndrew Tizzard
Andrew Tizzard
AGAdam P Gibson
Adam P Gibson
DHdavid holder
david holder

26 June 2007 in Physiological Measurement
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Alistair McEwanAlistair McEwan
Alistair McEwan
GCG Cusick
G Cusick
DHdavid holder
david holder
Multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography (MFEIT) was proposed over 10 years ago as a potential spectroscopic impedance imaging method. At least seven systems have been developed for imaging the lung, heart, breast and brain, yet none has yet achieved clinical acceptance. While the absolute impedance varies considerably between different tissues, the changes in the spectrum due to physiological changes are expected to be quite small, especially when measured through a volume. This places substantial requirements on the MFEIT instrumentation to maintain a flat system frequency response over a broad frequency range (dc-MHz). In this work, the EIT measurement problem is described from a multi-frequency perspective. Solutions to the common problems are considered from recent MFEIT systems, and the debate over four-terminal or two-terminal (multiple source) architecture is revisited. An analysis of the sources of MFEIT errors identifies the major sources of error as stray capacitance and common-mode voltages which lead to a load dependence in the frequency response of MFEIT systems. A system that employs active electrodes appears to be the most able to cope with these errors (Li et al 1996). A distributed system with digitization at the electrode is suggested as a next step in MFEIT system development.

31 December 2004
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
DHdavid holder
david holder
TTThomas Tidswell
Thomas Tidswell