Bedrock fault dislocation is a crucial structural factor influencing landslide movement. Accurately predicting the location and scale of rupture zones within a slope body is essential for effective slope construction design and risk mitigation. Based on an analysis of seismic damage in slope cross-bedrock faults, this article creatively realizes the physical model test of the slope and its covering layer site with soil rupture zones at the top and toe of the slope caused by the dislocation of the bedrock normal fault. Through the model test, macroscopic phenomena were observed, and microscopic analysis was obtained by deploying sensors. The main results were as follows: (i) The evolutionary process of the instability mechanism could be divided into three stages: crack damage stage (Stage I), crack expansion and penetration stage (Stage II), and slope instability stage (Stage III). (ii) Two rupture modes of the soil body in the slope under bedrock dislocation were identified, with the rupture mode at the slope crest having a greater impact on the soil slope. (iii) Inferring the position of bedrock faults through the location of the main rupture zones on the slope surface represents a feasible supplementary method for identifying seismogenic structures during field surveys. These research results provide a scientific basis for the stability assessment of cross-fault slopes and the reinforcement design of landslide disasters.

The investigation and analysis of building damage is the most direct and effective method to reveal its mechanism, but the statistics and analysis of building damage sample data near surface faults are obviously insufficient. Therefore, based on the influencing factors of building damage near surface faults, this article predicts the structural damage caused by the surface rupture effect of active faults. Through on-site investigation of earthquake damage and literature review, data collection was conducted on the seismic damage characteristics of buildings near surface fault zones, and a database of building damage near strong earthquake surface fault zones was established. Multiple linear and binary logistic regression models were used to quantitatively analyze the seismic damage of buildings. The results indicate that magnitude, types of fault, hanging wall and footwall of faults, width of surface rupture zone, fault distance, and vertical displacement have a significant impact on the seismic damage index of buildings. Based on earthquake damage examples, both prediction models have significant performance.

Performance-based seismic design methods for bridges are advancing, yet limited research has explored the damage mechanisms of bridges subjected to extreme seismic effects, such as those near or across faults. To investigate the damage mechanisms under bedrock dislocation and bridge rupture resistance, providing essential insights for the standardized design and construction of bridges in close proximity to seismic rupture sites, we developed a large-scale device to model bridges in the immediate vicinity of tilted-slip strong seismic rupture sites. This included a synchronous bedrock dislocation loading system. Four sets of typical sandy soil modeling tests were concurrently conducted. The results indicate: (1) The overall shear deformation zone of the foundation and surface uneven deformation primarily concentrate the overburdened soil body along the fault dip. The damaged area under the low-dip reverse fault is lighter on the surface and inside the soil body compared to the high-dip-positive fault. (2) The presence of bridges reduces the width of the main rupture zone and avoidance distance to some extent. However, this reduction is not as significant as anticipated. The damage to the bridge pile foundation along the fault dislocation tendency notably leads to the bending damage of the bridge deck. (3) Input parameters for fracture-resistant bridge design (surface rupture zone location, extent, maximum deformation, etc.) can be deduced from the free site. Within the rupture zone, a “fuse” design can be implemented using simply supported girders. Additionally, combining the “fuse” design with simple supported girders on both sides and utilizing simple support beams for “fuse” design within the rupture zone, along with structural “disconnection”, allows for reinforcing measures on the bridge structure’s foundation platform and pile in the soil body.