José Luis Marín-Muñiz

Dr. José Luis Marín-Muñiz

professor-research
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 March 2022 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GBGaston Ballut-Dajud
Gaston Ballut-Dajud
Luis Carlos Sandoval-HerazoLuis Carlos Sandoval-Herazo
Luis Carlos Sandoval-Herazo
GLGregorio Fernández Lambert
Gregorio Fernández Lambert
José Luis Marín-MuñizJosé Luis Marín-Muñiz
José Luis Marín-Muñiz
MLMaría-Cristina López-Méndez
María-Cristina López-Méndez
Erick Arturo Betanzo TorresErick Arturo Betanzo Torres
Erick Arturo Betanzo Torres
Despite occupying an area no greater than 8% of the earth’s surface, natural wetland ecosystems fulfill multiple ecological functions: 1. Soil formation and stabilization support, 2. Food, water, and plant biomass supply, 3. Cultural/recreational services, landscape, and ecological tourism, 4. Climate regulation, and 5. Carbon sequestration; with the last one being its most important function. They are subject to direct and indirect incident factors that affect plant productivity and the sequestration of carbon from the soil. Thus, the objective of this review was to identify the incident factors in the loss of area and carbon sequestration in marine, coastal, and continental wetlands that have had an impact on climate change in the last 14 years, globally. The methodology consisted of conducting a literature review in international databases, analyzing a sample of 134 research studies from 37 countries, organized in tables and figures supported by descriptive statistics and content analysis. Global results indicate that agriculture (25%), urbanization (16.8%), aquaculture (10.7%), and industry (7.6%) are incident factors that promote wetlands effective loss affecting continental wetlands more than coastal and marine ones. Regarding carbon sequestration, this is reduced by vegetation loss since GHG emissions raise because the soil is exposed to sun rays, increasing surface temperature and oxidation, and raising organic matter decomposition and the eutrophication phenomenon caused by the previous incident factors that generate wastewater rich in nutrients in their different activities, thus creating biomass and plant growth imbalances, either at the foliage or root levels and altering the accumulation of organic matter and carbon. It is possible to affirm in conclusion that the most affected types of wetlands are: mangroves (25.7%), lagoons (19.11%), and marine waters (11.7%). Furthermore, it was identified that agriculture has a greater incidence in the loss of wetlands, followed by urbanization and industry in a lower percentage.

17 February 2019 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Luis Carlos Sandoval-HerazoLuis Carlos Sandoval-Herazo
Luis Carlos Sandoval-Herazo
SERGIO ZAMORASERGIO ZAMORA
SERGIO ZAMORA
Monserrat Vidal ÁlvarezMonserrat Vidal Álvarez
Monserrat Vidal Álvarez
José Luis Marín-MuñizJosé Luis Marín-Muñiz
José Luis Marín-Muñiz
The vegetation in constructed wetlands (CWs) plays an important role in wastewater treatment. Popularly, the common emergent plants in CWs have been vegetation of natural wetlands. However, there are ornamental flowering plants that have some physiological characteristics similar to the plants of natural wetlands that can stimulate the removal of pollutants in wastewater treatments; such importance in CWs is described here. A literature survey of 87 CWs from 21 countries showed that the four most commonly used flowering ornamental vegetation genera were Canna, Iris, Heliconia and Zantedeschia. In terms of geographical location, Canna spp. is commonly found in Asia, Zantedeschia spp. is frequent in Mexico (a country in North America), Iris is most commonly used in Asia, Europe and North America, and species of the Heliconia genus are commonly used in Asia and parts of the Americas (Mexico, Central and South America). This review also compares the use of ornamental plants versus natural wetland plants and systems without plants for removing pollutants (organic matter, nitrogen, nitrogen and phosphorous compounds). The removal efficiency was similar between flowering ornamental and natural wetland plants. However, pollutant removal was better when using ornamental plants than in unplanted CWs. The use of ornamental flowering plants in CWs is an excellent option, and efforts should be made to increase the adoption of these system types and use them in domiciliary, rural and urban areas.

16 May 2018 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Luis Carlos Sandoval-HerazoLuis Carlos Sandoval-Herazo
Luis Carlos Sandoval-Herazo
Alejandro Alvarado-LassmanAlejandro Alvarado-Lassman
Alejandro Alvarado-Lassman
José Luis Marín-MuñizJosé Luis Marín-Muñiz
José Luis Marín-Muñiz
JMJuan Manuel Méndez-Contreras
Juan Manuel Méndez-Contreras
SERGIO ZAMORASERGIO ZAMORA
SERGIO ZAMORA
The high costs involved in treating wastewater are problems that developing countries confront, mainly in rural areas. Therefore, Constructed Wetlands (CWs), which are composed of substrate, vegetation, and microorganisms, are an economically and ecologically viable option for wastewater treatment in these places. There is a wide variety of possibilities for substrates and ornamental plants that have not yet been evaluated to be implemented in future CW designs. The goal of this study was to evaluate the process of adaptation and removal of wastewater pollutants in CW microcosms using different terrestrial ornamental plants (Lavandula sp., Spathiphyllum wallisii, and Zantedeschia aethiopica). Those plants were sown in two types of substrate: red volcanic gravel (RVG) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). CWs with vegetation reduced 5-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) by 68% with RVG substrate and 63% with PET substrate, nitrates 50% in RVG substrate and 35% in PET substrate, phosphates 38% in RVG substrate and 35% in PET substrate, and fecal coliforms 64% in RVG and 59% in PET substrate). In control microcosms without vegetation, reductions were significantly lower than those in the presence of plants, with reduction of BOD5 by 61% in RVG substrate and 55% in PET substrate, nitrates 26% in RVG substrate and 22% in PET substrate, phosphates 27% in RVG substrate and 25% in PET substrate. Concerning fecal coliforms 62% were removed in RVG substrate and 59% in PET substrate. Regarding the production of flowers, Lavandula sp. did not manage to adapt and died 45 days after sowing and did not produce flowers. Spathiphyllum wallisii produced 12 flowers in RVG and nine flowers in PET, while Zantedeschia aethiopica produced 10 in RVG and 7 in PET. These results showed that the use of substrates made of RVG and PET is a viable alternative to be implemented in CWs. In addition, the reuse of PET is an option that decreases pollution by garbage. The plants Spathiphyllum wallisii and Zantedeschia aethiopica remarkably contribute in the removal of pollutants in wastewater. Additionally, the use of ornamental plants, with commercial interest such as those evaluated, enables an added value to the CW to be given, which can be used for flower production purposes on a larger scale and favor its acceptance within rural communities.


1 April 2015 in Atmospheric Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
José Luis Marín-MuñizJosé Luis Marín-Muñiz
José Luis Marín-Muñiz
MHMaría E. Hernández
María E. Hernández
PMPatricia Moreno-Casasola
Patricia Moreno-Casasola

8 November 2019 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SERGIO ZAMORASERGIO ZAMORA
SERGIO ZAMORA
José Luis Marín-MuñizJosé Luis Marín-Muñiz
José Luis Marín-Muñiz
CNCarlos Nakase-Rodríguez
Carlos Nakase-Rodríguez
GLGregorio Fernández Lambert
Gregorio Fernández Lambert
Luis Carlos Sandoval-HerazoLuis Carlos Sandoval-Herazo
Luis Carlos Sandoval-Herazo
Constructed wetlands (CWs) are sustainable technologies where the channels are filled with porous material and plants, which collectively remove pollutants, depending on the type of substrate and vegetation. This study evaluated CWs and their functionality by comparing three ornamental plants (Canna indica, Cyperus papyrus, and Hedychium coronarium) as a phytoremediation process of wastewater, in CWs filled with layers of porous stone–tepezil–plastic residues–soil (S-A), or in microcosms with layers of porous stone–tepezil–soil without the presence of plastic (S-B). The findings during 180 days showed that the removals of pollutants (chemical oxygen demand (COD), total solids suspended (TSS), nitrogen as ammonium (N-NH4), as nitrate (N-NO3), and phosphate (P-PO4) were 20%–60% higher in microcosms with plants than in the absence of plants. Statistical differences were not observed when comparing removal effects among S-A and S-B, indicating that plastic residues as filter material in CWs did not affect the pollutant removal, growth, flowering, and shoots of plants. The use of plastic residues as filter may represent a less costly alternative in CW establishments. Dependence on N-NH4 and TSS removal was observed according to plant species. The three species used are suitable for using in CWs as wastewater treatment. In addition, the ornamental plants could generate interest for a commercial option.