Jonas Auda

Dr. Jonas Auda


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 October 2023 in ACM Computing Surveys
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JAJonas Auda
Jonas Auda
UGUwe Gruenefeld
Uwe Gruenefeld
SFSarah Faltaous
Sarah Faltaous
Sven MayerSven Mayer
Sven Mayer
SSStefan Schneegass
Stefan Schneegass
Immersive technologies such as Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) empower users to experience digital realities. Known as distinct technology classes, the lines between them are becoming increasingly blurry with recent technological advancements. New systems enable users to interact across technology classes or transition between them—referred to as cross-reality systems . Nevertheless, these systems are not well understood. Hence, in this article, we conducted a scoping literature review to classify and analyze cross-reality systems proposed in previous work. First, we define these systems by distinguishing three different types. Thereafter, we compile a literature corpus of 306 relevant publications, analyze the proposed systems, and present a comprehensive classification, including research topics, involved environments, and transition types. Based on the gathered literature, we extract nine guiding principles that can inform the development of cross-reality systems. We conclude with research challenges and opportunities.

31 July 2023 in International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CLCarina Liebers
Carina Liebers
MPMarvin Prochazka
Marvin Prochazka
NPNiklas Pfützenreuter
Niklas Pfützenreuter
JLJonathan Liebers
Jonathan Liebers
JAJonas Auda
Jonas Auda
SSStefan Schneegass
Stefan Schneegass

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLCarina Liebers
Carina Liebers
PMPranav Megarajan
Pranav Megarajan
JAJonas Auda
Jonas Auda
TSTim Claudius Stratmann
Tim Claudius Stratmann
MPMax Pfingsthorn
Max Pfingsthorn
SSStefan Schneegass
Stefan Schneegass
Robot training often takes place in simulated environments, particularly with reinforcement learning. Therefore, multiple training environments are generated using domain randomization to ensure transferability to real-world applications and compensate for unknown real-world states. We propose improving domain randomization by involving human application experts in various stages of the training process. Experts can provide valuable judgments on simulation realism, identify missing properties, and verify robot execution. Our human-in-the-loop workflow describes how they can enhance the process in five stages: validating and improving real-world scans, correcting virtual representations, specifying application-specific object properties, verifying and influencing simulation environment generation, and verifying robot training. We outline examples and highlight research opportunities. Furthermore, we present a case study in which we implemented different prototypes, demonstrating the potential of human experts in the given stages. Our early insights indicate that human input can benefit robot training at different stages.

27 August 2021
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
JAJonas Auda
Jonas Auda
RHRoman Heger
Roman Heger
UGUwe Gruenefeld
Uwe Gruenefeld
SSStefan Schneegass
Stefan Schneegass

2 December 2024
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
NWNick Wittig
Nick Wittig
TDTobias Drey
Tobias Drey
TWTheresa Wettig
Theresa Wettig
JAJonas Auda
Jonas Auda
MKMarion Koelle
Marion Koelle
SSStefan Schneegass
Stefan Schneegass

27 November 2022
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
JKJonas Keppel
Jonas Keppel
JLJonathan Liebers
Jonathan Liebers
JAJonas Auda
Jonas Auda
UGUwe Gruenefeld
Uwe Gruenefeld
SSStefan Schneegass
Stefan Schneegass
Nowadays, deep learning models enable numerous safety-critical applications, such as biometric authentication, medical diagnosis support, and self-driving cars. However, previous studies have frequently demonstrated that these models are attackable through slight modifications of their inputs, so-called adversarial attacks. Hence, researchers proposed investigating examples of these attacks with explainable artificial intelligence to understand them better. In this line, we developed an expert tool to explore adversarial attacks and defenses against them. To demonstrate the capabilities of our visualization tool, we worked with the publicly available CIFAR-10 dataset and generated one-pixel attacks. After that, we conducted an online evaluation with 16 experts. We found that our tool is usable and practical, providing evidence that it can support understanding, explaining, and preventing adversarial examples.