This study aims to investigate the interaction between market volatility, economic growth, and cognitive biases over the period from April 2006 to March 2024. Market volatility and economic growth are critical indicators that influence economic stability and investment behavior. Financial market volatility, defined by abrupt and erratic changes in asset values, can have a big impact on the expansion and stability of the economy. According to conventional economic theory, there should be an inverse relationship between market volatility and economic growth since high volatility can discourage investment and erode trust. Market participants’ cognitive biases are a major aspect that complicates this connection. Due to our innate susceptibility to cognitive biases, including herd mentality, overconfidence, and loss aversion, humans can make poor decisions and increase market volatility. These prejudices frequently cause investors to behave erratically and irrationally, departing from reasonable expectations and causing inefficiencies in the market. Cognitive biases have the capacity to sustain feedback loops, which heighten market turbulence and may hinder economic expansion. Similarly, cognitive biases have the potential to cause investors to misread economic indicators or ignore important details, which would increase volatility. This study uses the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) model on GDP growth data from the US, the UK, and India, alongside S&P 500, FTSE 100, and NIFTY 50 data sourced from Bloomberg, to examine evidence of these biases. The results show evidence of the predictive nature of market fluctuations on economic performance across the markets and highlight the substantial effects of cognitive biases on market volatility, disregarding economic fundamentals and growth, emphasizing the necessity of considering psychological factors in financial market analyses and developing strategies to mitigate their adverse effects.

This study investigates the valuation dynamics of 30 publicly listed fintech firms across six Asian economies from January 2021 to December 2025. It examines how intrinsic firm-level scale (market capitalization) and extrinsic macroeconomic conditions (GDP growth) jointly influence fintech valuation ratios, as reflected in price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-book (P/B), and price-to-sales (P/S) measures. It also identifies significant structural heterogeneity and distributional asymmetries in valuation outcomes by implementing a multi-method empirical strategy that includes a Panel Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) framework, two-way fixed-effects models with interaction terms, and quantile regression. The findings reveal a robust, positive long-run relationship between market capitalization and valuation multiples across all ratios, confirming that firm-level scale as reflected in market capitalization is the primary driver of market value. Critically, the analysis identifies a dual-regime landscape in the Asian fintech sector: developed markets (South Korea, Japan, and Singapore) are fundamentally firm-scale driven, where intrinsic scale is the superior predictor of valuation. In contrast, developing markets (China, India, and Indonesia) are primarily macro-growth driven, exhibiting high sensitivity to GDP growth as a macroeconomic indicator of market expansion. The quantile regression results demonstrate a winner-takes-all effect, where the impact of scale on valuation is significantly more pronounced for highly valued firms in the 75th percentile. These results challenge the efficacy of universal valuation models and provide a context-dependent navigational framework for investors, analysts, and policymakers to distinguish between structural scale and cyclical growth in the rapidly evolving Asian fintech ecosystem.

1. In the 21st century, nations are increasingly measured not only by their economic output or demographic scale but by their contributions to global knowledge systems. Research productivity and ac...