Seasonal predictions of precipitation and surface air temperature from the Climate Forecast System, version 2 (CFSv2), are evaluated against gridded daily observations from 1982 to 2007 over 17 hydroclimatic regions in China. The seasonal predictive skill is quantified with skill scores including correlation coefficient, RMSE, and mean bias for spatially averaged seasonal precipitation and temperature forecasts for each region. The evaluation focuses on identifying regions and seasons where significant skill exists, thus potentially contributing to skill in hydrological prediction. The authors find that the predictive skill of CFSv2 precipitation and temperature forecasts has a stronger dependence on seasons and regions than on lead times. Both temperature and precipitation forecasts show higher skill from late summer [July–September (JAS)] to late autumn [October–December (OND)] and from winter [December–February (DJF)] to spring [March–May (MAM)]. The skill of CFSv2 precipitation forecasts is low during summer [June–August (JJA)] and winter (DJF) over all of China because of low potential predictability of the East Asian summer monsoon and the East Asian winter monsoon for China. As expected, temperature predictive skill is much higher than precipitation predictive skill in all regions. As observed precipitation shows significant correlation with the Oceanic Niño index over western, southwestern, and central China, the authors found that CFSv2 precipitation forecasts generally show similar correlation pattern, suggesting that CFSv2 precipitation forecasts can capture ENSO signals. This evaluation suggests that using CFSv2 forecasts for seasonal hydrological prediction over China is promising and challenging.
18 November 2023 in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Multisource meteorological re-analyses provide the most reliable forcing data for driving hydrological models to simulate streamflow. We aimed to assess different hydrological responses through hydrological modeling in the upper Lancang-Mekong River Basin (LMRB) using two gridded meteorological datasets, Climate Forecast System Re-analysis (CFSR) and the China Meteorological Assimilation Driving Datasets for the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model (CMADS). We selected the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (R), percent bias (PBIAS), and root mean square error (RMSE) indices to compare the six meteorological variables of the two datasets. The spatial distributions of the statistical indicators in CFSR and CMADS, namely, the R, PBIAS, and RMSE values, were different. Furthermore, the soil and water assessment tool plus (SWAT+) model was used to perform hydrological modeling based on CFSR and CMADS meteorological re-analyses in the upper LMRB. The different meteorological datasets resulted in significant differences in hydrological responses, reflected by variations in the sensitive parameters and their optimal values. The differences in the calibrated optimal values for the sensitive parameters led to differences in the simulated water balance components between the CFSR- and CMADS-based SWAT+ models. These findings could help improve the understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of different meteorological re-analysis datasets and their roles in hydrological modeling.
Determination of the optimal parameter values in numerical weather prediction (NWP) models has a significant impact on predictions. Here, we propose a knee point‐based multiobjective optimization (KMO) method to find an optimal solution of the NWP model parameters. We apply it to optimize the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model's summer precipitation and temperature simulations for the Greater Beijing area. The results showed that it required fewer than 125 samples (i.e., 25 times the number of dimensions of the parameter space) to obtain the WRF model's optimal parameter values. The optimal parameters determined by KMO outperform the default parameters in WRF simulations for summer precipitation and temperature prediction in the Greater Beijing area, across all periods (calibration, validation, and testing). Additionally, clear physical interpretations are provided to explain why the optimal parameters lead to improved precipitation and temperature forecasting. Overall, the proposed method is effective and efficient to improve NWP.
Seasonal forecasts from dynamical models are expected to be useful for drought predictions in many regions. This study investigated the usefulness of the Climate Forecast System version 2 (CFSv2) in improving meteorological drought prediction in China based on its 25-year reforecast. The six-month standard precipitation index (SPI6) was used as the drought indicator, and its persistence forecast served as the benchmark against which CFSv2 forecasts were evaluated. The analysis found that the SPI6 persistence forecast shows good skills in all regions at short lead times, and CFSv2 forecast can further improve those skills in most regions. The improvement is particularly pronounced at longer lead times and over the humid regions in the southeast. This study also examined the seasonality and regionality of persistence forecast skills and CFSv2 contributions, and reveals regions where CFSv2 forecast shows no or sometimes even negative contributions.