Lin Pan

Dr. Lin Pan

Central south university

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2021 in Advances In Space Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Lin PanLin Pan
Lin Pan
XGXiao Gao
Xiao Gao
JHJiahuan Hu
Jiahuan Hu
FMFujian Ma
Fujian Ma
ZZZhiyu Zhang
Zhiyu Zhang
WWWeiwang Wu
Weiwang Wu

23 October 2020 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Lin PanLin Pan
Lin Pan
LXli xp
li xp
WYWenkun Yu
Wenkun Yu
WDWujiao Dai
Wujiao Dai
CKCuiling Kuang
Cuiling Kuang
Pengfei XiaPengfei Xia
Pengfei Xia
For time-critical precise applications, one popular technology is the real-time precise point positioning (PPP). In recent years, there has been a rapid development in the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS), and the constellation of global BDS (BDS-3) has been fully deployed. In addition to the regional BDS (BDS-2) constellation, the real-time stream CLK93 has started to support the BDS-3 constellation, indicating that the real-time PPP processing involving BDS-3 observations is feasible. In this study, the global positioning performance of real-time PPP with BDS-3/BDS-2 observations is initially evaluated using the datasets from 147 stations. In the east, north and upward directions, positioning accuracy of 1.8, 1.2 and 2.5 cm in the static mode, and of 6.7, 5.1 and 10.4 cm in the kinematic mode can be achieved for the BDS-3/BDS-2 real-time PPP, respectively, while the corresponding convergence time with a threshold of 10 cm is 32.9, 23.7 and 32.8 min, and 66.9, 42.9 and 69.1 min in the two modes in the three directions, respectively. To complete this, the availability of BDS-3/BDS-2 constellations, the quality of BDS-3/BDS-2 real-time precise satellite products, and the BDS-3/BDS-2 post-processed PPP solutions are also analyzed. For comparison, the results for the GPS are also presented.

7 July 2025 in GPS Solutions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Lin PanLin Pan
Lin Pan
CYChen Yang
Chen Yang

29 September 2021 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LXli xp
li xp
Lin PanLin Pan
Lin Pan
The space segment of all the five satellite systems capable of providing precise position services, namely BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) (including BDS-3 and BDS-2), Global Positioning System (GPS), GLObal NAvigation Satellite System (GLONASS), Galileo and Quasi-Zenith Satellite System (QZSS), has almost been fully deployed at present, and the number of available satellites is approximately 136. Currently, the precise satellite orbit and clock products from the analysis centers European Space Agency (ESA), GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam (GFZ) and Wuhan University (WHU) can support all five satellite systems. Thus, it is necessary to investigate the positioning performance of a five-system integrated precise point positioning (PPP) (i.e., GRECJ-PPP) using the precise products from different analysis centers under the current constellation status. It should be noted that this study only focuses on the long-term performance of PPP based on daily observations. The static GRECJ-PPP can provide a convergence time of 5.9–6.9/2.6–3.1/6.3–7.1 min and a positioning accuracy of 0.2–0.3/0.2–0.3/1.0–1.1 cm in east/north/up directions, respectively, while the corresponding kinematic statistics are 6.8–8.6/3.3–4.0/7.8–8.1 min and 1.0–1.1/0.8/2.5–2.6 cm in three directions, respectively. For completeness, although the real-time precise products from the analysis center Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES) do not incorporate QZSS satellites, the performance of real-time PPP with the other four satellite systems (i.e., GREC-PPP) is also analyzed. The real-time GREC-PPP can achieve a static convergence time of 8.7/5.2/11.2 min, a static positioning accuracy of 0.6/0.8/1.3 cm, a kinematic convergence time of 11.5/6.9/13.0 min, and a kinematic positioning accuracy of 1.7/1.6/3.6 cm in the three directions, respectively. For comparison, the results of single-system and dual-system PPP are also provided. In addition, the consistency of the precise products from different analysis centers is characterized.

18 November 2021 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Lin PanLin Pan
Lin Pan
ZZZhang zhehao
Zhang zhehao
WYWenkun Yu
Wenkun Yu
WDWujiao Dai
Wujiao Dai
Global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) have been booming in recent years, and the space segment of all four of the GNSSs, including BDS (BDS-3/BDS-2), Galileo, GPS, and GLONASS, has almost been fully deployed at present. The single point positioning (SPP) technology, which is widely used in satellite navigation and low-accuracy positioning, can benefit from the multi-GNSS integration, but the additional intersystem bias (ISB) parameters should be introduced to ensure the compatibility among different GNSSs. In this study, the ISB estimates derived from four-system integrated SPP are carefully characterized, and the performance enhancement attributed to a priori ISB constraints by prediction for position solutions under open sky and constrained visibility environments is rigorously evaluated. The results indicate that the ISB between BDS-3 and BDS-2 cannot be ignored. The daily ISBs show step changes when encountering the replacement of receiver types, while it is not the case for the receiver firmware versions. The daily ISBs are roughly consistent for the stations equipped with the same type of receivers. The short-term stability of epochwise ISBs for GLONASS, Galileo, BDS-2, and BDS-3 with respect to GPS can be 2.335, 1.262, 1.741, and 1.532 ns, respectively, whereas the corresponding long-term stability for daily ISBs can be 1.258, 1.288, 2.713, and 2.566 ns, respectively. The single-day prediction accuracy of daily ISBs for GLONASS, Galileo, BDS-2, and BDS-3 with respect to GPS can be 1.055, 0.640, 1.242, and 0.849 ns, respectively. The improvements on positioning accuracy after introducing a priori ISB constraints can be over 20% at an elevation mask of 40° and 50° with a time span of ISB prediction of a day. As to the availability, it is only 64.0% for traditional four-system SPP under a cutoff elevation of 50°, while the corresponding availability is increased to approximately 90.0% after considering a priori ISB constraints. For completeness, the characteristics of ISBs estimated with the low-cost u-blox M8T receiver and the Xiaomi Mi8 smartphone as well as the contribution of a priori ISB constraints to the multisystem SPP solutions with these devices are also investigated.

18 August 2021 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
XLXuanping Li
Xuanping Li
Lin PanLin Pan
Lin Pan
WYWenkun Yu
Wenkun Yu
The Quasi-Zenith Satellite System (QZSS), which serves Japan and its surrounding areas, is a regional navigation satellite system developed by Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency. The system is now in a four-satellite constellation with preliminary standalone navigation and positioning capabilities. In this paper, the performance of QZSS-only precise point positioning (PPP) in both static and kinematic modes is initially evaluated using the datasets spanning 11 days from 11 tracking stations in Asia-Pacific regions and the final precise orbit and clock products from the analysis centers GFZ and WUM. For completeness, the GPS/QZSS integrated data processing with GFZ and WUM final products as well as the L6E real-time orbit and clock corrections is also analyzed. The results indicate that the static positioning accuracy of QZSS-only PPP is approximately 4, 2 and 15 cm in the east, north and up directions, respectively, and the static convergence time of QZSS-only PPP with WUM and GFZ products can be 75.2, 44.3 and 45.6 min, and 153.5, 201.6 and 162.8 min in the three directions, respectively. As for the QZSS-only kinematic PPP solutions, the re-convergence repeatedly occurs due to limited available satellites. To achieve more reliable solutions, the inter-system bias parameter in GPS/QZSS PPP processing is recommended to be estimated as random walk process or white noise process. The improvement of post-processed GPS/QZSS PPP over GPS-only case is marginal on position accuracies, but can be several minutes on convergence time. Compared with post-processed GPS/QZSS PPP, the real-time one achieves worse position accuracies but comparable convergence time.