Luis Mauricio Martins de Resende

Prof. Luis Mauricio Martins de Resende

Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná - UTFPR, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

27 September 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ARArthur Rossi
Arthur Rossi
GMGiovanna Bueno Marcondes
Giovanna Bueno Marcondes
JPJoseane Pontes
Joseane Pontes
Paulo LeitãoPaulo Leitão
Paulo Leitão
FTFernanda Treinta
Fernanda Treinta
RYRUI Tadashi YOSHINO
RUI Tadashi YOSHINO
With the evolution of Industry 4.0, some problems related to inefficient digitalization become clearer in organizations. To minimize these problems, implementation of the lean philosophy is needed in the digital environment. However, before Lean can start to solve the digitalization problems, there is a need to digitalize its tools so that they can comprehend the Industry 4.0 dynamics and become more effective. The aim of this study is to contribute to the theoretical development of Lean tools in the context of Industry 4.0, promoting directions for the industrial sector from the evolution, difficulties, benefits, implementation and trends of Lean 4.0 tools. To achieve this objective, this study performs a systematic literature review and content analysis of 53 papers from 35 journals. The main results of the research show: (i) the characterization of the Lean 4.0 tools; (ii) the evolution of the Lean tools after the integration with digital technologies; (iii) the main trends of Lean 4.0; (iv) the proposal of a Lean 4.0 theoretical framework. From these results, this paper seeks to promote insights for studies in the area of Lean 4.0, as well as for companies to implement and use the Lean 4.0 tools for better improvement in their digital processes and avoid the digital waste.

1 January 2018 in Industrial Marketing Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LRLuis Mauricio Martins de Resende
Luis Mauricio Martins de Resende
IVIsabela Volski
Isabela Volski
LBLeozenir Mendes Betim
Leozenir Mendes Betim
GCGustavo Dambiski Gomes de Carvalho
Gustavo Dambiski Gomes de Carvalho
RBRodrigo de Barros
Rodrigo de Barros
FSFabio Pietrobelli Senger
Fabio Pietrobelli Senger

6 June 2018 in Ciência da Informação
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RPRegina Negri Pagani
Regina Negri Pagani
JKJoão Luiz Kovaleski
João Luiz Kovaleski
LRLuis Mauricio Martins de Resende
Luis Mauricio Martins de Resende
O aumento no número das publicações científicas torna o trabalho dos pesquisadores cada vez mais complexo e extenso no que se refere à seleção de material bibliográfico para o embasamento da pesquisa. Esta é uma tarefa que consome tempo e requer critérios adequados para selecionar efetivamente os trabalhos mais relevantes. O objetivo deste trabalho é apresentar uma revisão sistemática de literatura sobre o tema Modelos de Transferencia de Tecnologia, utilizando a Methodi Ordinatio, metodologia de revisão sistemática que orienta a busca, seleção, coleta e classificação de artigos científicos, tendo as TICs como suporte, com alguns melhoramentos aplicados, como o uso do JabRef para coletar os dados dos artigos científicos. O que difere a Methodi Ordinatio das outras metodologias de revisão sistemática é a utilização da equação InOrdinatio, que permite classificar os artigos quanto à sua relevância científica. A equação trabalha com os três fatores mais importantes em um artigo científico: o fator de impacto, o ano da publicação da pesquisa e o número de citações. Com o objetivo de demonstrar a dinâmica da metodologia, apresenta-se uma pesquisa com o tema Modelos de Transferencia de Tecnologia (MTT), compreendendo trabalhos de 1990 a 2015. Os resultados indicam que a metodologia é eficaz em relação aos objetivos a que se propõe, e os trabalhos mais relevantes sobre MTT são utilizados para construir o cenário neste tema.

8 June 2018 in Scientometrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ECElaine Aparecida Regiani de Campos
Elaine Aparecida Regiani de Campos
RPRegina Negri Pagani
Regina Negri Pagani
LRLuis Mauricio Martins de Resende
Luis Mauricio Martins de Resende
JPJoseane Pontes
Joseane Pontes

20 June 2020 in Benchmarking: An International Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FBFranciele Bonatto
Franciele Bonatto
LRLuis Mauricio Martins de Resende
Luis Mauricio Martins de Resende
JPJoseane Pontes
Joseane Pontes
Purpose: The goal of this research is to establish which contextual factors influence the selection of relational governance instruments in supply chains (SCs) and how these factors impact the expected performance.Design/methodology/approach: A systematic literature review (SLR) identified 103 conceptual, empirical and analytical studies between 2007 and 2017.Findings: A conceptual framework is developed from the categorization of contextual factors, relational governance instruments and expected SC performance. The conceptual framework provides three propositions: (1) The choice for relational governance instrument is influenced differently by the contextual factors; (2) the impact that the contextual factors have on the governance instruments and SC performance is mediated by trust; (3) The SC performance is affected differently by the instruments of flexibility, solidarity and information sharing.Practical implications: The findings of this research can help business managers better govern and know the contextual factors and use different relational governance instruments and trust dimensions to drive the expected results of the SC.Originality/value: The synthesis reveals contingencies of relational governance instruments in SCs for performance expected in different contexts and proposes a standpoint for further research in the area.