Background: The combination of elexacaftor–tezacaftor–ivacaftor modulators (ETI) has improved clinical outcomes for people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate changes in nutritional and morphofunctional assessments, as well as anxiety, depression symptoms, and quality of life, in pwCF after starting ETI therapy. Methods: This was a prospective observational study. We measured body composition (fat mass [FM] and fat-free mass [FFM]) using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and skinfold thickness measurements (SMs). We also assessed hand grip strength, dietary intake via surveys, blood and stool biomarkers, symptoms of anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS], and quality of life through the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire—Revised (CFQR). Results: A total of 31 pwCF were evaluated. Significant improvements were observed in respiratory function and quality of life, alongside an average weight increase of approximately 5 kg (60% FM and 40% FFM). The prevalence of malnutrition, based on BMI and the FFM index, decreased significantly, while the rate of overweight/obesity increased. Biomarker analysis indicated better nutrient absorption and reduced intestinal inflammation, as evidenced by significant changes in faecal calprotectin, nitrogen, and fat levels, as well as blood lipid and vitamin profiles. Conclusions: Despite a reduction in caloric intake, an increase in weight was observed one year after initiating ETI. This increase was attributed to gains in both FM and FFM, suggesting improved metabolic efficiency and nutrient absorption. Both SM and BIA were found to be useful assessment tools. These findings indicate the need to modify the nutritional approach, focusing on the quality rather than the quantity of intake, and aiming for an appropriate body composition (FFM) rather than solely focusing on BMI.

Background: Malnutrition in patients undergoing hemodialysis is frequent and associated with a reduction in muscular mass and strength, with an increment in biomarkers of inflammation and oxidation.Materials and methods: Randomized, multicenter, parallel-group trial in malnourished hemodialysis patients with three groups [(1) control (C) individualized diet, (2) oral nutritional supplement-ONS- + placebo-SU- PL-, and (3) ONS + probiotics-SU-PR]; the trial was open regarding the intake of ONS or individualized diet recommendations, but double-blind for the intake of probiotics. We obtained, at baseline and after 3 and 6 months, anthropometric measurements, handgrip strength, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), dietary records, and routine biochemical parameters. Inflammation and oxidation were determined using ELISA techniques (Versamax and ProcartaPlex multiplex Immunoassay). Results were analyzed by intention to treat.Results: A total of 31 patients (11 corresponding to group C, 10 to SU-PL, and 10 to SU-PR) completed the 6-months trial. The two groups that took supplements significantly increased their protein calorie, fat (total and n-3), and fiber intake. Weight and fat-free mass (FFM) also increased significantly in the groups on supplements, both at 3 and 6 months, and dynamometry did so in the SU-PL group. At month 3, prealbumin and vitamin D were significantly increased in the SU-TOT (SU-PL + SU-PR) group. No changes were observed regarding levels of phosphorus and potassium in any of the groups. Urea increased significantly at 6 months in the SU-PL group. There were significant changes in some inflammation biomarkers in the groups on supplements during the intervention (brain-derived neurotrophic factor, bone morphogenetic protein-2, MCP-1, IL-1-beta, IL-10, IL-4, and IL-8). The total antioxidant capacity (TAC) increased significantly in the supplemented patients, with no significant changes observed in isoprostanes.Conclusion: The specific ONS improved protein-calorie intake, nutritional status (mainly FFM), and some biomarkers of inflammation/oxidation. The addition of probiotics could have a synergistic effect with ONS in such biomarkers.Clinical trail registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/, identifier NCT03924089.

Background/Objectives: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is more prevalent and severe in women with overweight or obesity. This study evaluated the effect of a comprehensive lifestyle intervention—comprising supervised exercise, a hypocaloric Mediterranean diet, and optional meal replacement—on lymphedema outcomes in this population. Methods: In this pilot randomized controlled trial, 112 women with BCRL and BMI 25–40 kg/m² were assigned to an intervention group—receiving supervised resistance and aerobic training, dietary counseling, and optional high-protein meal replacement—or to a control group with standard advice. The primary outcome was change in affected limb volume at 3 and 6 months. Secondary outcomes included morphofunctional parameters, muscle strength, dietary intake, and serum levels of cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α). Analyses also explored outcomes according to whether participants achieved ≥ 5% weight loss. Results: Ninety-four participants completed the trial (intervention n = 43, control n = 51). At 6 months, women who achieved ≥5% weight loss had greater reductions in affected limb volume (−664.9 ± 362.1 mL vs. −395.6 ± 596.9 mL). The intervention group showed significantly greater improvements in BMI (−1.14 ± 1.22 kg/m²), waist circumference (−3.59 ± 4.6 cm), triceps skinfold (−4.61 ± 3.02 mm), fat mass (−2.38 ± 2.75 kg), extracellular water (−0.58 ± 0.85 L), and quadriceps strength (+7.1 ± 9.7 kg). No significant changes were observed in circulating cytokines. Conclusions: In this pilot randomized controlled trial, a structured dietary and exercise intervention improved morphofunctional outcomes in overweight women with BCRL. Weight loss of ≥5% emerged as a potentially relevant therapeutic target that may inform the design of future studies aimed at optimizing lymphedema management.

Malnutrition is prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially those on hemodialysis. Recently, our group described that a new oral nutritional supplement (ONS), specifically designed for malnourished (or at risk) hemodialysis patients with a “similar to the Mediterranean diet” pattern, improved caloric-protein intake, nutritional status and biomarkers of inflammation and oxidation. Our aim in this study was to evaluate whether the new ONS, associated with probiotics or not, may produce changes in miRNA’s expression and its target genes in malnourished hemodialysis patients, compared to individualized diet recommendations. We performed a randomized, multicenter, parallel-group trial in malnourished hemodialysis patients with three groups (1: control (C) individualized diet (n = 11); 2: oral nutritional supplement (ONS) + placebo (ONS-PL) (n = 10); and 3: ONS + probiotics (ONS-PR) (n = 10)); the trial was open regarding the intake of ONS or individualized diet recommendations but double-blinded for the intake of probiotics. MiRNAs and gene expression levels were analyzed by RT-qPCR at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. We observed that the expression of miR-29a and miR-29b increased significantly in patients with ONS-PR at 3 months in comparison with baseline, stabilizing at the sixth month. Moreover, we observed differences between studied groups, where miR-29b expression levels were elevated in patients receiving ONS-PR compared to the control group in the third month. Regarding the gene expression levels, we observed a decrease in the ONS-PR group compared to the control group in the third month for RUNX2 and TNFα. TGFB1 expression was decreased in the ONS-PR group compared to baseline in the third month. PTEN gene expression was significantly elevated in the ONS-PR group at 3 months in comparison with baseline. LEPTIN expression was significantly increased in the ONS-PL group at the 3-month intervention compared to baseline. The new oral nutritional supplement associated with probiotics increases the expression levels of miR-29a and miR-29b after 3 months of intervention, modifying the expression of target genes with anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic actions. This study highlights the potential benefit of this oral nutritional supplement, especially associated with probiotics, in malnourished patients with chronic renal disease on hemodialysis.

Ultraprocessed food (UPF) is defined as industrialized, packaged and ready-to-eat food produced on a large scale, using sophisticated industrial machinery. Examples of UPFs include salty and sweet snacks, industrialized biscuits and packaged meals, processed meats and sugary drinks. Ultraprocessed food has a long-shelf life, is highly palatable, microbiologically safe, affordable and most of all, easy to consume. For these reasons, its consumption has been increasing worldwide, and is replacing healthy homemade meals. The main concern of this dietary shift is that UPFs come with the addition of salt, sugar, unhealthy fats, and several additives and taste enhancers that contain, among other substances, relevant quantities of potassium, phosphate and sodium. A large proportion of UPF in the diet may carry risks for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) since it can worsen blood pressure and glycemic control, and lead to constipation, hyperkalemia and hyperphosphatemia. Acknowledging the importance of UPF in kidney health implies integrating nutritional counseling with information on UPFs, and specific educational material can be helpful for patients, caregivers, and also for health care providers. We developed a set of 3 infographics dedicated to CKD patients, with information on how to identify UPFs, reasons for decreasing consumption, how to compose a healthy CKD plate and tips for reading food labels in supermarkets and grocery shops. We hope that this material can be useful in CKD outpatient clinics and dialysis centers as well as in general practitioners’ offices, caring for early stage CKD.