Markys Cain

Prof. Markys Cain

Electrosciences Ltd, Farnham, Surrey, UK
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 August 2013 in Journal of the American Ceramic Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TCTatiana M. Correia
Tatiana M. Correia
MMMark McMillen
Mark McMillen
MRMariej K. Rokosz
Mariej K. Rokosz
PWPaul M. Weaver
Paul M. Weaver
MGMarty Gregg
Marty Gregg
Markys CainMarkys Cain
Markys Cain

14 August 2013 in Energy & Environmental Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJoe Briscoe
Joe Briscoe
NJNimra Jalali
Nimra Jalali
PWPeter Woolliams
Peter Woolliams
MSMark Stewart
Mark Stewart
PWPaul M. Weaver
Paul M. Weaver
SDSteve Dunn
Steve Dunn
Electromechanical energy harvesting converts mechanical energy from the environment, such as vibration or human activity, into electrical energy that can be used to power a low power electronic device. Nanostructured piezoelectric energy harvesting devices, often termed nanogenerators, have rapidly increased in measured output over recent years. With these improvements nanogenerators have the potential to compete with more traditional micro- or macroscopic energy harvesting devices based on piezoelectric ceramics such as lead zirconate titanate (PZT), polymers such as polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) or electrostatic, electret or electromagnetic kinetic energy harvesters. Power output from a nanogenerator is most commonly measured through open-circuit voltage and/or short-circuit current, where power may be estimated from the product of these values. Here we show that such measures do not provide a complete picture of the output of these devices, and can be misleading when attempting to compare alternative designs. In order to compare the power output from a nanogenerator, techniques must be improved in line with those used for more established technologies. We compare ZnO nanorod/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and ZnO nanorod/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) devices, and show that despite an open-circuit voltage nearly three times lower the ZnO/PEDOT:PSS device generates 150 times more power on an optimum load. In addition, it is shown that the peak voltage and current output can be increased by straining the device more rapidly and therefore time-averaged power, or time-integrated measures of output such as total energy or total charge should be calculated. Finally, the internal impedance of the devices is characterised to develop an understanding of their behaviour and shows a much higher internal resistance but lower capacitive impedance for the ZnO/PMMA device. It is hoped that by following more rigorous testing procedures the performance of nanostructured piezoelectric devices can be compared more realistically to other energy harvesting technologies and improvements can be rapidly driven by a more complete understanding of their behaviour.

29 May 2012 in Advanced Energy Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJoe Briscoe
Joe Briscoe
MSMark Stewart
Mark Stewart
Melvin M. VopsonMelvin M. Vopson
Melvin M. Vopson
Markys CainMarkys Cain
Markys Cain
PWPaul M. Weaver
Paul M. Weaver
SDSteve Dunn
Steve Dunn

27 July 2010 in Physical Review B
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Melvin M. VopsonMelvin M. Vopson
Melvin M. Vopson
JBJohn Blackburn
John Blackburn
Markys CainMarkys Cain
Markys Cain
PWPaul M. Weaver
Paul M. Weaver
The understanding of electric polarization dynamics is a complex problem of critical importance for both fundamental studies of ferroelectric materials and their applications to nonvolatile memories. In this paper we focus on second-order phase transition ferroelectrics, as defined in Landau\char22{}Devonshire framework, which display a particular free-energy profile as a function of the ordering parameter, that has two energy minima separated by an energy barrier. Assuming a domain nucleation polarization reversal mechanism, this particular energy dependence allowed us to introduce an electric polarization reversal model based on the nonequilibrium statistics of the domain nucleation process. Using the Pauli master equation we have determined the time-dependent occupation probabilities of the polarization states of the nucleation sites, which can be used to generate analytical expressions for the temporal dependence of the reversed polarization, transient switching current, and the switching time. In addition, we have derived an analytic expression for the time and thermal dependence of the coercive field and we discuss the depolarization field effects on the polarization reversal dynamics in thin-film ferroelectric structures.

16 August 2007 in Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Melvin M. VopsonMelvin M. Vopson
Melvin M. Vopson
JBJohn Blackburn
John Blackburn
Markys CainMarkys Cain
Markys Cain

1 July 2006 in Journal of Electroceramics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Chris BowenChris Bowen
Chris Bowen
LNL. J. Nelson
L. J. Nelson
RSR. Stevens
R. Stevens
Markys CainMarkys Cain
Markys Cain
MSM. Stewart
M. Stewart