Matheus L. Oliveira

Dr. Matheus L. Oliveira

State University of Campinas - Piracicaba Dental School, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2013 in Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MOMatheus L. Oliveira
Matheus L. Oliveira
GTGuilherme M. Tosoni
Guilherme M. Tosoni
DLDavid H. Lindsey
David H. Lindsey
KMKristopher Mendoza
Kristopher Mendoza
STSotirios Tetradis
Sotirios Tetradis
SMSanjay M. Mallya
Sanjay M. Mallya

23 May 2017 in Clinical Oral Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PQPolyane Mazucatto Queiroz
Polyane Mazucatto Queiroz
MOMatheus L. Oliveira
Matheus L. Oliveira
FGFrancisco Carlos Groppo
Francisco Carlos Groppo
FHFrancisco Haiter-Neto
Francisco Haiter-Neto
DFDeborah Queiroz Freitas
Deborah Queiroz Freitas

14 December 2012 in Clinical Oral Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MOMatheus L. Oliveira
Matheus L. Oliveira
EPEsio Fortaleza Nascimento Chaves Pedrosa
Esio Fortaleza Nascimento Chaves Pedrosa
ACAdriana Dibo Cruz
Adriana Dibo Cruz
FHFrancisco Haiter-Neto
Francisco Haiter-Neto
FPFrancisco Jose Albuquerque Paula
Francisco Jose Albuquerque Paula
PWPlauto christopher aranha Watanabe
Plauto christopher aranha Watanabe

24 August 2013 in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FNFrederico Sampaio Neves
Frederico Sampaio Neves
MNMonikelly Carmo Chagas Nascimento
Monikelly Carmo Chagas Nascimento
MOMatheus L. Oliveira
Matheus L. Oliveira
SASolange Maria Almeida
Solange Maria Almeida
FBFrab Norberto Bóscolo
Frab Norberto Bóscolo

9 March 2024 in Clinical Oral Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TSThaísa Pinheiro Silva
Thaísa Pinheiro Silva
MAMaria Fernanda Silva Andrade-Bortoletto
Maria Fernanda Silva Andrade-Bortoletto
TOThaís Santos Cerqueira Ocampo
Thaís Santos Cerqueira Ocampo
CACaio Alencar-Palha
Caio Alencar-Palha
MBMichael M Bornstein
Michael M Bornstein
MOMatheus L. Oliveira
Matheus L. Oliveira
Objectives: To evaluate the performance of a commercially available Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) in describing and establishing differential diagnoses for radiolucent lesions in panoramic radiographs. Materials and methods: Twenty-eight panoramic radiographs, each containing a single radiolucent lesion, were evaluated in consensus by three examiners and a commercially available ChatGPT-3.5 model. They provided descriptions regarding internal structure (radiodensity, loculation), periphery (margin type, cortication), shape, location (bone, side, region, teeth/structures), and effects on adjacent structures (effect, adjacent structure). Diagnostic impressions related to origin, behavior, and nature were also provided. The GPT program was additionally prompted to provide differential diagnoses. Keywords used by the GPT program were compared to those used by the examiners and scored as 0 (incorrect), 0.5 (partially correct), or 1 (correct). Mean score values and standard deviation were calculated for each description. Performance in establishing differential diagnoses was assessed using Rank-1, -2, and − 3. Results: Descriptions of margination, affected bone, and origin received the highest scores: 0.93, 0.93, and 0.87, respectively. Shape, region, teeth/structures, effect, affected region, and nature received considerably lower scores ranging from 0.22 to 0.50. Rank-1, -2, and − 3 demonstrated accuracy in 25%, 57.14%, and 67.85% of cases, respectively. Conclusion: The performance of the GPT program in describing and providing differential diagnoses for radiolucent lesions in panoramic radiographs is variable and at this stage limited in its use for clinical application. Clinical relevance: Understanding the potential role of GPT systems as an auxiliary tool in image interpretation is imperative to validate their clinical applicability.

1 July 2018 in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAmanda P Candemil
Amanda P Candemil
BSBenjamin Salmon
Benjamin Salmon
DFDeborah Queiroz Freitas
Deborah Queiroz Freitas
GAGlaucia Mb Ambrosano
Glaucia Mb Ambrosano
FHFrancisco Haiter-Neto
Francisco Haiter-Neto
MOMatheus L. Oliveira
Matheus L. Oliveira
Objectives:To assess the influence of artefacts arising from metallic materials in the exomass on cone beam CT (CBCT) voxel values.Methods:CBCT scans were taken of a phantom composed of 16 tubes filled with a homogeneous hyperdense solution and metallic materials of different compositions (titanium, cobalt–chromium and amalgam) and numbers (one, two and three). The phantom was centred in a 5 × 5 cm field of view such that the metallic materials were located in the exomass, using three CBCT units. Voxel values were obtained from the 16 homogeneous areas and averaged. Also, standard deviation was calculated to measure voxel value variability. Analysis of variance in a factorial scheme with additional treatment 3 × 3 + 3 (material × number + control) was performed, followed by Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons, and Dunnett’s test for comparisons with the control groups, at a level of significance of 5%.Results:Metallic material in the exomass significantly reduced the mean voxel value in the CS9300 and P...