This study aimed to compare two different bulk-filling techniques, evaluating the internal and external adaptation of class II resin-composite restorations, by analysing the gap formation using microcomputed tomography (µ-CT) and scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Two standardized mesio/disto-occlusal (MO/DO) cavities were prepared in eight extracted human third molars that were divided, according to the filling technique used, in the following two groups (n = 4): BG (Bulk&Go group) and BT (Bulk Traditional group). After universal bonding application, followed by the light curing, all teeth were restored using a bulk-fill composite. Specimens were scanned with µ-CT to evaluate 3D interfacial gaps. Acquired µ-CT data were analysed to quantify the gap formation. Complementary information to the µ-CT analysis were obtained by SEM. Thereafter, the chemical composition of tooth–restoration interface was analysed using EDS. The µ-CT analysis revealed gaps formation at the tooth–restoration interface for both the BG and BT groups, while within the restoration, only in the BT group there was evidence of microleakage formation. The scanning electron micrographs of both groups showed that the external marginal integrity of the restoration was preserved, while EDS showed the three different structures (tooth surface, adhesive layer and resin composite) of the tooth–restoration interface, highlighting the absence of gap formation. In both BG and BT, the two filling techniques did not show significant differences regarding the internal and external marginal adaptation of the restoration. To achieve a successful restoration, the clinician could be advised to restore a class II cavity using a single increment bulk-filling technique (BG), thus treating it as a class I cavity.

Objectives: The aim of the present human observational study is to provide morphologic and morphometric analysis of peri‐implant connective tissue next to abutments with divergent or convergent macro‐geometry and different surface micro‐characteristics.Materials and Methods: Thirty patients were rehabilitated with single implants in the posterior area and one out of three different healing abutments with a one‐stage technique: machined divergent abutment (DIV‐MAC), machined convergent abutment (CONV‐MAC) or convergent abutment with ultrathin threaded surface (CONV‐UTM). At 3 months postimplant insertion, peri‐implant soft tissue was harvested; the following outcomes were investigated: histomorphometry (vertical width of connective and epithelial components) as detected by histology and polarized light; and connective tissue vertical width and 3D organization as detected by synchrotron‐based high‐resolution phase‐contrast‐based tomography (PhC‐μCT).Results: Significant differences in connective tissue vertical dimension (aJE‐AM) were found between DIV‐MAC and both CONV‐MAC and CONV‐UTM, both by histology and PhC‐μCT, with significantly higher values for the last two groups. Moreover, 2D histological analysis did not find significant differences in the junctional epithelium vertical dimension (PM‐aJE). Importantly, PhC‐μCT analysis revealed, at 3D level, significant greater amount and density of collagen bundles for CONV‐UTM compared with the other two groups.Conclusions: Convergent abutment profiles, regardless of their surface micro‐geometry, seem to favor axial development of peri‐implant connective tissue. Moreover, ultrathin threaded surfaces seem associated with denser and greater connective tissue organization, which might improve peri‐implant soft tissue seal.