Recently, the IMO (International Maritime Organization) has reviewed technical issues considering the second generation intact stability criteria in the design stage of ships. In this paper, the evaluation procedure for Lv1 (Level 1) and Lv2 (Level 2) was introduced by focusing on the excessive acceleration mode. Based on real ship data, the calculation process has been explained in detail to make it easy to understand. When the Lv1 criteria considering simple hydrostatic calculations are not satisfied, the computational results of the Lv2 criteria based on mathematical modeling and the hydrodynamics are presented. The relatively low ship roll periods and large changes in the hull shape in the vertical direction make the ships potentially vulnerable to excessive acceleration phenomena. Therefore, the minimum value of height KG that satisfies the stability criteria evaluation in consideration of loading conditions for actually navigating of the ship in the sea should be estimated and operated. In particular, roll damping coefficients using the Ikeda’s method, which are essential for Lv2 vulnerability calculation, were obtained and verified by comparing them with other ship results.

Recently, with respect to structural strength and relevant analysis of a float-counterweight wave energy converter, it has been more improved than existing oscillating body type. This study is mainly focusing on dynamic motion and wave power generation of ‘multi-connected’ float-counterweight device by calculating the acquired generation amount. This advanced research was based on the float-counterweight device which was conducted through the wave's up and down motion by setting up the wave chamber in the R&D Center of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries LTD. Most of all, it was obtained that the ‘multi-connected’ float-counterweight device would be more efficient and practical than the original one in terms of float displacement, wire tension and amount of wave power. Through this study, a basic data for design of wave chamber was utilised on advantageous condition under actual circumstances of the sea and then estimation of generation amount for the ‘multi-connected’ float-counterweight device was realised, compared to the original one.

A review of the 2nd generation of intact stability by the International Maritime Organization is performed. The main issues with the new stability criteria are reviewed. In particular, the physical background and related mathematical formulations of the pure loss of stability and parametric roll are summarized. Based on a literature review, benchmark calculation results for 17 different types of ships are discussed, and the final results are in excellent agreement with our physical expectations. Some relatively serious design problems are found in the application of the new stability criteria to sample ships built in Korea, and possible technical solutions are proposed, which have to be improved in the coming years.

In this paper, the evaluation procedure for Level 1, Level 2A, and Level 2B for the parametric roll among the five modes of the IMO second generation stability criteria was explained in detail. Parametric roll mode evaluation was performed using the design data of a medium-sized 13K chemical tanker instead of a well-known container ship. As a result of the Level 1 evaluation, δGM₁/GM was smaller than the standard value, thus satisfying the first criterion, but the second criterion value was smaller than 1, so it was found that the Level 1 criterion was not satisfied. Subsequently, in the Level 2A evaluation, the weighted sum value was larger than the standard value under the ship speed and given wave conditions, so it was also not satisfied. In particular, the process of numerical analysis in the time domain was described through the equation of motion when estimating the maximum roll angle of a ship in the Level 2B evaluation, which was not detailed in previous studies. The calculation result was larger than the standard value, so it was not satisfied, and consequently, the 13K chemical tanker did not satisfy Level 1, Level 2A, and 2B.