Mustafa Serkan Isik

Dr. Mustafa Serkan Isik

OpenGeoHub foundation, Doorwerth, The Netherlands
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 November 2022 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mehmet Furkan CelikMehmet Furkan Celik
Mehmet Furkan Celik
Mustafa Serkan IsikMustafa Serkan Isik
Mustafa Serkan Isik
Onur YuzugulluOnur Yuzugullu
Onur Yuzugullu
NFNoura Fajraoui
Noura Fajraoui
Esra ErtenEsra Erten
Esra Erten
Soil moisture (SM) is an important biophysical parameter by which to evaluate water resource potential, especially for agricultural activities under the pressure of global warming. The recent advancements in different types of satellite imagery coupled with deep learning-based frameworks have opened the door for large-scale SM estimation. In this research, high spatial resolution Sentinel-1 (S1) backscatter data and high temporal resolution soil moisture active passive (SMAP) SM data were combined to create short-term SM predictions that can accommodate agricultural activities in the field scale. We created a deep learning model to forecast the daily SM values by using time series of climate and radar satellite data along with the soil type and topographic data. The model was trained with static and dynamic features that influence SM retrieval. Although the topography and soil texture data were taken as stationary, SMAP SM data and Sentinel-1 (S1) backscatter coefficients, including their ratios, and climate data were fed to the model as dynamic features. As a target data to train the model, we used in situ measurements acquired from the International Soil Moisture Network (ISMN). We employed a deep learning framework based on long short-term memory (LSTM) architecture with two hidden layers that have 32 unit sizes and a fully connected layer. The accuracy of the optimized LSTM model was found to be effective for SM prediction with the coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.87, root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.046, unbiased root mean square error (ubRMSE) of 0.045, and mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.033. The model’s performance was also evaluated concerning above-ground biomass, land cover classes, soil texture variations, and climate classes. The model prediction ability was lower in areas with high normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) values. Moreover, the model can better predict in dry climate areas, such as arid and semi-arid climates, where precipitation is relatively low. The daily prediction of SM values based on microwave remote sensing data and geophysical features was successfully achieved by using an LSTM framework to assist various studies, such as hydrology and agriculture.

3 November 2021 in Journal of Geodesy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YWYan Ming Wang
Yan Ming Wang
LSLaura Sánchez
Laura Sánchez
JÅJonas Ågren
Jonas Ågren
JHJianliang Huang
Jianliang Huang
RFRené Forsberg
René Forsberg
PZPhilipp Zingerle
Philipp Zingerle

9 August 2023 in IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mehmet Furkan CelikMehmet Furkan Celik
Mehmet Furkan Celik
Mustafa Serkan IsikMustafa Serkan Isik
Mustafa Serkan Isik
GTGulsen Taskin
Gulsen Taskin
Esra ErtenEsra Erten
Esra Erten
GCGustau Camps-Valls
Gustau Camps-Valls
Cotton is under the threat of climate and ecosystem change, and has an essential role in the global textile industry. This makes its yield prediction essential for both economics and sustainability. The potential cotton yield can be predicted by integrating climatic factors, soil parameters, and biophysical parameters observed by high temporal & spatial resolution remote sensing satellites. This study used a multisource dataset to create an explainable and accurate predictive model for cotton yield prediction over the continental US (CONUS). A recently proposed glass-box method called Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM), which provides transparency, reliability, and ease of interpretation, was implemented. Accuracy performance was compared with common machine learning (ML) methods for predicting cotton yields. The EBM showed higher accuracy against other glass-box methods and competitive results with black-box models. With the help of the EBM, the importance of individual features and their pairwise interactions was revealed without applying any post-hoc methods. The study findings showed that the precipitation (P), enhanced vegetation index (EVI), and leaf area index (LAI) are the three most important dynamic features. The dynamic features are the driver of the created model with 78% of the overall feature importance, followed by pairwise interactions of the features with 16% contribution. Lastly, static features contribute 6% to the overall feature importance. The study highlights the importance of using multi-source data and interactions of the input features and providing an interpretable model to understand the inner dynamics of cotton yield predictions.

7 April 2021 in Journal of Geodesy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Mustafa Serkan IsikMustafa Serkan Isik
Mustafa Serkan Isik
Bihter ErolBihter Erol
Bihter Erol
Serdar ErolSerdar Erol
Serdar Erol
FSFatıma Feyza Sakil
Fatıma Feyza Sakil

21 August 2017 in Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
George VergosGeorge Vergos
George Vergos
Bihter ErolBihter Erol
Bihter Erol
DNDimitrios A. Natsiopoulos
Dimitrios A. Natsiopoulos
VGVassilios N. Grigoriadis
Vassilios N. Grigoriadis
Mustafa Serkan IsikMustafa Serkan Isik
Mustafa Serkan Isik
ITIlias N. Tziavos
Ilias N. Tziavos

6 February 2026 in Earth System Science Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Tomislav HenglTomislav Hengl
Tomislav Hengl
DCDavide Consoli
Davide Consoli
XTXuemeng Tian
Xuemeng Tian
TNTravis W. Nauman
Travis W. Nauman
MNMadlene Nussbaum
Madlene Nussbaum
NHNancy Harris
Nancy Harris
There is increasing interest in global dynamic soil information with changes in soil properties mapped over time and at high spatial resolution. Thanks to long-term, multi-temporal, and fine- and medium-resolution satellite missions such as Landsat, MODIS, Copernicus Sentinel and similar, it is possible to produce globally consistent predictions of key soil variables that match other 10–30 m spatial resolution global data sets. This paper describes data preparation, modeling, and production of OpenLandMap-soildb: global dynamic predictions of soil organic carbon content, soil organic carbon density, bulk density, soil pH in H2O, soil texture fractions (clay, sand and silt) and USDA subgroup soil types (USDA soil taxonomy subgroups) at 30 m spatial resolution based on spatiotemporal Machine Learning (Quantile Regression Random Forest with output predictions showing the mean plus the 68 % probability lower and upper prediction intervals). To train the models, a large compilation of soil samples imported from legacy soil projects was used: 216 000 soil samples with soil carbon density (kg m−3), 408 000 soil samples with soil carbon content (g kg−1), 272 000 soil samples with soil pH in H2O, 363 000 soil samples with clay, silt and sand content (%) and 134 000 samples with bulk density oven dry (t m−3). Soil carbon and soil pH were mapped with 5-year time-intervals; soil texture fractions, bulk density, and soil types were mapped for recent years only. The cross-validation results indicate Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 17.7 (kg m−3; 0.486 in log-scale) and Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) of 0.88 for SOC density, RMSE of 51.3 (g kg−1; 0.574 in log-scale) and CCC of 0.87 for SOC content, RMSE of 0.15 (t m−3) and CCC of 0.92 for bulk density of fine-earth, RMSE of 0.51 and CCC of 0.91 for soil pH, RMSE of 8.4 % and CCC of 0.87 for soil clay content, and RMSE of 12.6 % and CCC of 0.84 for soil sand content respectively. The most important variables for predicting soil organic carbon density (kg m−3) were: soil depth, Landsat-based uncalibrated Gross Primary Productivity (GPP), Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and CHELSA bioclimatic indices. The global distribution of soil pH can be primarily explained by the CHELSA Aridity Index (long-term), annual precipitation, and salinity grade. The global stocks for 2020–2022+ period for 0–30 cm depth interval are estimated at 461 Pg (Peta grams); the results further indicate that, in the last 25 years, the world has lost at least 11 Pg of SOC in the top soil. Suggestions are made on how to set up global permanent monitoring stations to accurately track land degradation and enable land restoration projects. The training data set is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4748499 (Hengl and Gupta, 2025), while the resulting data products can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15470431 (Consoli et al., 2025) and https://world.soils.app (OpenGeoHub Foundation, 2026). Both datasets are released under a CC-BY license.