Background: Visual impairments and age-related eye diseases need to be detected and treated in a timely manner. However, this is often hampered by lack of appropriate medical equipment. We have invented a portable, recordable, and smartphone-attachable slit-lamp device, called the Smart Eye Camera (SEC). The aim of this study was to compare evaluating nuclear cataract (NUC) between the SEC and the conventional, non-portable slit-lamp microscope. Methods: A total of 128 eyes of 64 Japanese patients (mean age: 73.95 ± 9.28 years; range: 51‒92 years; female: 34) were enrolled. The NUC was classified into four grades (grade 0 to 3) based on three standard photographs of nuclear opacities according to the WHO classification by ophthalmologists. An ophthalmic healthcare assistant (non-ophthalmologist) filmed the eyes in video mode by the SEC and an ophthalmologist graded the NUC. Grade correlation and inter-rater reproducibility were determined. Results: NUC grading by the two approaches correlated significantly (both eyes: r = 0.871 [95%CI: 0.821 to 0.907; p < 0.001]). Inter-rater agreement was high (weighted κ = 0.807 [95%CI: 0.798 to 0.816; p < 0.001]). Conclusions: This study suggests that the SEC is as reliable as the conventional non-portable slit-lamp microscope for evaluating NUC.

This study assessed the anterior chamber depth (ACD) and iridocorneal angle using a portable smart eye camera (SEC) compared to the conventional slit-lamp microscope and anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). This retrospective case-control study included 170 eyes from 85 Japanese patients. The correlation between the ACD evaluations conducted with the SEC and conventional slit-lamp was high (r = 0.814). The correlation between the Van-Herick Plus grade obtained using two devices was also high (r = 0.919). A high kappa value was observed for the Van-Herick Plus grading (Kappa = 0.757). A moderate correlation was observed between the ACD measured using AS-OCT and the slit-lamp image acquired with the conventional slit-lamp microscope and SEC (r = 0.609 and 0.641). A strong correlation was observed between the trabecular-iris angle (TIA) measured using AS-OCT and Van-Herick Plus grade obtained with the conventional slit-lamp microscope and SEC (r = 0.702 and 0.764). Strong correlations of ACD evaluation and high kappa value of the Van-Herick Plus grading indicated the adequate subjective assessment function of the SEC. Moderate correlations between the ACD objective measurement and evaluation and strong correlation between the TIA and Van-Herick Plus grade suggested the good objective assessment function of the SEC. The SEC demonstrated adequate performance for ACD evaluation and angle estimation.

Background: The incidence of allergic conjunctival diseases (ACDs) is gradually increasing worldwide. Both ophthalmologists and non-ophthalmologists prescribe eye drops to treat ACDs; however, there are many cases which are treated without sufficient examination and diagnosis of the eyes. We have invented a portable, recordable, and smartphone-attachable slit-lamp device—Smart Eye Camera (SEC). The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic abilities of ACDs between the SEC and the conventional, non-portable slit-lamp microscope. Methods: This prospective observational study included 32 eyes of 17 Japanese patients (mean age: 21.5 ± 14.8 years; range: 11–51 years; female: 5). The severity of 10 objective signs in the palpebral conjunctiva, bulbar conjunctiva, limbus, and cornea were scored on a grading scale of 0 to 4 (0 = normal; 1+ = mild; 2+ = moderate; 3+ = severe), respectively. First, the conventional slit-lamp microscope was used to examine the grade of the ACDs. Second, another ophthalmologist filmed the eyes using the SEC and two other ophthalmologists evaluated the grades on another day. The correlation and inter-rater reproducibility in total scores among the two devices were determined. Results: Total scores of clinical signs, evaluated by the two approaches, correlated significantly (both eyes: r = 0.918 (95% CI: 0.839 to 0.959; p < 0.001)), with substantial inter-rater agreement (weighted κ value = 0.631 (95% CI: 0.601 to 0.661; p < 0.001)). Conclusions: The SEC is as reliable as the conventional non-portable slit-lamp microscope for assessing ACDs.

Background: Chronic ocular graft-versus-host disease (oGVHD) is an ocular comorbidity of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) that usually occurs concurrently with systemic manifestations. Failure to detect and treat oGVHD in its early stages may lead to progression of ocular signs and symptoms leading to oGVHD that is refractory to conventional treatment.Case presentation: We report the clinical course of a 19-year-old male and a 59-year-old female with severe and progressive chronic oGVHD without concurrent systemic signs of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). Although their systemic conditions had been stable, both suffered from severe oGVHD and were referred to our clinic. Both cases exhibited marked improvement in conjunctival inflammation and fibrotic changes after amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT). Both cases underwent keratoplasty eventually to stabilize ocular surface conditions and to improve visual function.Conclusions: We reported the clinical outcomes of 2 cases of chronic oGVHD without concurrent systemic comorbidities that were treated with AMT. The clinician should be aware that cGVHD may persist in target organs even in the absence of concurrent systemic comorbidities following seemingly successful systemic treatment. A multidisciplinary team approach is essential in the early detection and therapeutic intervention for chronic oGVHD.

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of expression treatment on meibomian gland disease (MGD). Seventeen right eyes of 17 patients with MGD were divided into 3 groups in this randomized prospective clinical study: no expression group: routine treatment with no expression (five patients, five eyes); digital expression group: routine treatment with digital expression (five patients, five eyes); and plate expression group: routine treatment with plate expression (seven patients, seven eyes). All groups received the same routine treatment for 1 month. Tear film break-up time (TBUT), vital staining scores, meibum expressibility, and the dry eye–related quality of life score (DEQS) questionnaire results were assessed before and 1 month after treatment. There was a statistically significant difference of posttreatment TBUT among groups as determined by one-way analysis of variance (PConclusion: Plate expression when used as an adjunct to routine medical management of MGD has been found to be a comparatively effective treatment in terms of improvement of tear film stability compared with no expression or digital expression.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible effects of the noncontact air puff tonometry (NCT) and Icare rebound tonometry (ICT) on the tear film stability by using the tear stability analysis system (TSAS) and dry eye parameters. Fifteen eyes from fifteen normal healthy subjects were investigated in this study. All subjects underwent TSAS surface regularity index (SRI) examinations, TBUT, and IOP measurements. The mean IOP results measured with NCT were 13.3 ± 1.86 mm Hg, and the mean IOP results measured with ICT were 15.88 ± 3.09 mm Hg (p > 0.05). The mean values of baseline, 5 min, and 10 min of the NCT-SRI and ICR-SRI were tested. There were statistically significant differences between NCT-Baseline SRI, NCT-5 min SRI, and NCT-10 min SRI values (p < 0.05). SRI values significantly increased after NCT. The mean values of the baseline, 5 min, and 10 min of the ICT-SRI were also assessed. There were no statistically significant differences between ICT-Baseline SRI, ICT-5 min SRI, and ICT-10 min SRI values (p > 0.05). The mean TBUT values exhibited a significant decrease at 1 min, 5 min, and 10 min compared with baseline values for the NCT and ICT (p < 0.01). NCT-TBUT and ICT-TBUT values were also compared with each other in the same time period. There were no statistically significant differences between NCT-Baseline and ICT-Baseline TBUT values (p > 0.05). In conclusion, intraocular pressure measurements in routine ophthalmology clinical practices by either NCT or ICT cause deterioration in the tear film stability which might affect tear stability testing when performed soon after IOP measurements. It is best to wait at least for 20–30 min after the IOP measurement before evaluating the tear film and the corneal surface or perform tonometry after the tear film-ocular surface evaluation tests.