The experience and self-confidence of healthcare professionals play critical roles in reducing anxiety levels during emergencies. It is important to recognize the potential impact of anxiety on performance. To enhance preparedness and confidence in managing emergencies, healthcare professionals benefit from regular training and simulations. Additionally, repeated exposure to emergency scenarios can help modulate physiological responses. Managing anxiety effectively is key, as heightened sympathetic stimulation associated with anxiety can adversely affect performance. This study aimed to investigate nurses’ self-assessed ability to manage emergency guidelines and their self-confidence in performing tasks in critical care settings. A questionnaire was provided to 1097 nurses. We compared the self-confidence of experienced nurses (ENs) and newly licensed nurses (NLNs) in managing emergency department shifts or critical patients, and found that ENs are more confident in these scenarios. This phenomenon was also observed in subjects who had taken simulation courses, although they were still a low percentage. Most NLNs feel sufficiently ready to work in medium-intensity wards. Attending advanced training courses enhances nurses’ self-confidence and may improve patient safety management., improving patient recovery, and minimizing errors. Attending courses improves the perception of autonomy of nurses in different scenarios.

Background: Cardiac arrest is a critical condition affecting approximately 1 in every 1000 people in Europe. Feedback devices have been developed to enhance the quality of chest compressions during CPR, but their clinical impact remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the effect of feedback devices on key clinical outcomes in adult patients experiencing both out-of-hospital (OHCA) and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). The primary objective is to assess their impact on the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC); secondary objectives include the evaluation of neurological status and survival to discharge. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, utilizing databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. Studies published between 2000 and 2023 comparing CPR with and without the use of feedback devices were included. A fixed-effects network meta-analysis was performed for ROSC and survival, while a frequentist meta-analysis was conducted for neurological outcomes. Results: Twelve relevant studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis results showed that the use of audiovisual feedback devices significantly increases the likelihood of ROSC (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.13–1.41, p < 0.0001) and survival (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.27–1.81, p < 0.0001) compared to CPR without feedback. However, the effect of metronomes did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: Feedback devices, particularly audiovisual ones, are associated with improved clinical outcomes in cardiac arrest patients. Their use should be encouraged in both training settings and real-life emergency scenarios to enhance survival rates and ROSC. However, further studies are needed to confirm long-term impacts and to explore the potential benefits of metronomes.

Background: Newly licensed physicians play a significant role in healthcare systems. However, they often lack knowledge about vaccine practices. This study aims to evaluate their ability to distinguish between fake news and the actual side effects of vaccines. Methods: We distributed a questionnaire to assess newly licensed physicians’ knowledge of side effects of vaccines and widespread fake news about them. We enrolled 317 newly licensed Italian physicians. Results: The average questionnaire score was 6.21/10 (SD = ±1.25). Work experience and age did not correlate with scores. Conclusions: Many participants were not able to distinguish between fake news and real vaccines’ side effects (e.g., the possible association between varicella vaccine and seizures). Furthermore, many physicians have been shown to believe in fake news. This lack of knowledge could lead to the inability to scientifically respond to anti-vaccinationists, thus increasing mistrust in medical counseling. Addressing knowledge gaps among recently licensed physicians is crucial to improving proper counseling and increasing public adherence to vaccination campaigns.

Background: Cardiac arrests can occur both in and out of hospital settings. Over the years, several protocols have been developed to standardize the behavior of healthcare professionals called upon to deal with these emergencies. Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) algorithms enable healthcare professionals to effectively manage cardiac arrest and achieve better patient outcomes, particularly at the time of discharge. Methods: We conducted a narrative review. Three databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane) were searched for relevant articles. The articles were screened and analyzed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Results: A total of 1252 articles were initially identified. After screening, 11 papers were included in the review. From the selected studies, it has emerged that ACLS training had several positive effects, including an overall decrease in mortality rates. Adherence to ACLS protocols throughout an event is associated with increased Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) in the setting of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (IHCA). Advanced Life Support (ALS) response interval in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was associated with decreased survival and a favorable neurological outcome. ALS response ≤ 10 min was associated with improved survival and favorable neurological outcomes. Conclusions: This review underscores the importance of adherence to ALS/ACLS guidelines in the resuscitation of patients who suffer in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Background/Objectives: Nutritional management is a core component of care for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and nephrology nurses play a key role in education and clinical monitoring. However, how nurses develop and enact nutritional competence in daily practice remains insufficiently explored. This study aimed to explore nephrology nurses’ perceptions and experiences of nutritional management in CKD care. Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted through semi-structured interviews with 22 nephrology nurses. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis according to Braun and Clarke. Methodological rigor was ensured following trustworthiness criteria, and reporting adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines. Results: The thematic analysis of the interviews identified six main themes: (1) Professional identity and nutritional competence, largely developed through clinical experience rather than structured education. (2) Interprofessional collaboration, perceived as essential but inconsistently implemented. (3) Nutritional education in practice, embedded in daily care and tailored to individual needs. (4) Experiential learning through self-directed nutrition updating. (5) Patient-related challenges, including adherence issues, generational differences, and cultural/educational barriers. (6) Nutritional assessment and decision-making, grounded in routine clinical monitoring and personalized judgment. Participants also highlighted the potential of decision-support tools to enhance personalized nutritional management. Conclusions: Strengthening structured nutritional training, improving interprofessional integration, and implementing shared protocols may enhance the consistency, quality, and safety of nutritional care for patients with CKD, supporting more effective translation of evidence into clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Triage is the first step in patient assessment within the Emergency Department and requires advanced nursing competencies. Although the five-level triage system has been widely implemented, evidence regarding triage knowledge among healthcare professionals working outside Emergency Departments remains limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess knowledge of the triage system, priority codes, and triage nurses’ competencies among physicians and nurses working outside Emergency Departments in an Italian Local Health Authority. METHODS: A monocentric cross-sectional observational study was conducted using an anonymous ad hoc electronic questionnaire, previously pilot-tested, administered to physicians and nurses not affiliated with Emergency Departments. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of the 234 professionals invited, 118 completed the survey (response rate: 50.4%). Participants demonstrated good knowledge of the fundamental principles of triage, the triage nurse’s role in assigning priority codes, and the associated professional responsibilities. However, uncertainty remained regarding newly introduced priority codes, advanced triage nursing competencies, and the application of specific clinical protocols. Overall, 75.4% of respondents expressed interest in receiving additional triage training. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare professionals working outside Emergency Departments showed an overall satisfactory understanding of the triage system, although important knowledge gaps remain regarding advanced competencies and organisational aspects. Continuing education initiatives may promote more consistent application of triage principles and contribute to improving the quality and safety of emergency care.