Objective To investigate the effects of siponimod on cognitive processing speed in patients with secondary progressive (SP) multiple sclerosis (MS), by means of a predefined exploratory and post hoc analysis of the Exploring the Efficacy and Safety of Siponimod in Patients With Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (EXPAND) study, a randomized controlled trial comparing siponimod and placebo. Methods EXPAND was a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial involving 1,651 patients with SPMS randomized (2:1) to either siponimod 2 mg/d or placebo. Cognitive function was assessed with the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT), and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test–Revised (BVMT-R) administered at baseline, 6-month intervals, and end of treatment. Results Between-group differences in mean change from baseline in SDMT scores were significantly better in siponimod- vs placebo-treated patients at month 12 (difference 1.08 [95% confidence interval 0.23–1.94]; p = 0.0132), month 18 (1.23 [0.25–2.21); p = 0.0135), and month 24 (2.30 [1.11–3.50]; p = 0.0002). Siponimod-treated patients were at significantly lower risk for having a 4-point sustained decrease in SDMT score (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79 [0.65–0.96]; p = 0.0157), while their chance for having a 4-point sustained increase in SDMT score was higher (HR 1.28 [1.05–1.55]; p = 0.0131). PASAT and BVMT-R scores did not differ significantly between the 2 treatment groups (all p > 0.28). Conclusion Siponimod had a significant benefit on SDMT in patients with SPMS. Siponimod-treated patients were at significantly lower risk for having a ≥4-point decrease in SDMT score and had a significantly higher chance for having a ≥4-point increase in SDMT score, a magnitude of change accepted as clinically meaningful. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01665144. Classification of Evidence This study provides Class II evidence that, for patients with SPMS, siponimod had a significant benefit on cognitive processing speed.

Background and Objectives Masitinib is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, targeting innate immune cells (mast cells and microglia) that are involved in the pathophysiology of progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Study AB07002 assessed oral masitinib in patients with progressive MS who were progressing but not clinically active. Methods This randomized, double-blind, 2 parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial assessing 2 dose levels of masitinib vs equivalent placebo was conducted at 116 hospital clinics and specialized MS centers in 20 countries. Randomization (2:1) with minimization was performed centrally using an automated system. Patients, physicians, and outcome assessors remained masked to treatment group allocation. Patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS) or nonactive secondary progressive MS (nSPMS) without relapse for ≥2 years, aged 18–75 years, with baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 2.0–6.0, and regardless of time from onset were treated for 96 weeks. The primary end point was overall EDSS change from baseline using repeated measures (generalized estimating equation, timeframe W12–W96, measured every 12 weeks), with positive values indicating increased clinical deterioration. Efficacy and safety were assessed in all randomly assigned and treated patients. Results A total of 611 patients were randomized; 301 in the masitinib 4.5 mg/kg/d parallel group and 310 in the uptitrated masitinib 6.0 mg/kg/d parallel group. Masitinib (4.5 mg/kg/d) (n = 199) showed significant benefit over placebo (n = 101) according to the primary end point, 0.001 vs 0.098, respectively, with a between-group difference of −0.097 (97% CI −0.192 to −0.002); p = 0.0256. Safety was consistent with masitinib9s known profile (diarrhea, nausea, rash, and hematologic events), with no elevated risk of infection. Efficacy results from the independent uptitrated masitinib 6.0 mg/kg/d parallel group were inconclusive, and no new safety signal was observed. Discussion Masitinib (4.5 mg/kg/d) can benefit people with PPMS and nSPMS. A confirmatory phase 3 study will be initiated to substantiate these data. Trial Registration Information The first participant was randomized to study AB07002 on August 25, 2011. The trial was registered with the European Clinical Trials Database (#EudraCT 2010-021219-17) on July 1, 2011 (clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2010-021219-17/ES) and with ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT01433497) on September 14, 2011 (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01433497). Classification of Evidence This study provides Class II evidence that masitinib 4.5 mg/kg/d decreased progression of disability, measured by the EDSS, in adults with PPMS or patients with nSPMS (with no exacerbations in the last 2 years).

Objective To evaluate the frequency of asymptomatic optic nerve lesions and their role in the asymptomatic retinal neuroaxonal loss observed in multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods We included patients with remitting-relapsing MS in the VWIMS study (Analysis of Neurodegenerative Process Within Visual Ways In Multiple Sclerosis) (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: 03656055). Included patients underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT), optic nerve and brain MRI, and low-contrast visual acuity measurement. In eyes of patients with MS without optic neuritis (MS-NON), an optic nerve lesion on MRI (3D double inversion recovery [DIR] sequence) was considered as an asymptomatic lesion. We considered the following OCT/MRI measures: peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, macular ganglion cell + inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL) volumes, optic nerve lesion length, T2 lesion burden, and fractional anisotropy within optic radiations. Results An optic nerve lesion was detected in half of MS-NON eyes. Compared to optic nerves without any lesion and independently of the optic radiation lesions, the asymptomatic lesions were associated with thinner inner retinal layers (p < 0.0001) and a lower contrast visual acuity (p ≤ 0.003). Within eyes with asymptomatic optic nerve lesions, optic nerve lesion length was the only MRI measure significantly associated with retinal neuroaxonal loss (p < 0.03). Intereye mGCIPL thickness difference (IETD) was lower in patients with bilateral optic nerve DIR hypersignal compared to patients with unilateral hypersignal (p = 0.0317). For the diagnosis of history of optic neuritis, sensitivity of 3D DIR and of mGCIPL IETD were 84.9% and 63.5%, respectively. Conclusions Asymptomatic optic nerve lesions are an underestimated and preponderant cause of retinal neuroaxonal loss in MS. 3D DIR sequence may be more sensitive than IETD measured by OCT for the detection of optic nerve lesions.

Treatment with cladribine tablets (CladT), an immune reconstitution therapy for relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), involves two short courses of treatment in Year 1 and Year 2. Most patients achieve sustained efficacy with CladT, but a small proportion may experience new disease activity (DA). Following completion of the indicated dose, physicians may have questions relating to the long-term management of these patients. Since the EU approval of CladT over 5 years ago, real-world evidence (RWE) is increasing and may provide some insights and guidance for clinical practice. We describe a systematic literature review (SLR) of RWE and provide expert opinions relating to six questions regarding the long-term use of CladT. Pertinent clinical questions were developed by a steering committee (SC) of 14 international multiple sclerosis (MS) experts regarding breakthrough DA in Year 1, new DA after 2 years or more of treatment, long-term management of stable patients, and whether additional courses of CladT may be required or safe. An SLR was performed in EMBASE and PubMed using the population, intervention, comparators, outcomes, study design (PICOS) framework to identify relevant studies within the last 15 years. Searches of key congress proceedings for the last 2-3 years were also performed. Following review of the results and RWE, the SC drafted and agreed on expert opinion statements for each question. A total of 35 publications reporting RWE for CladT were included in this review. In the real world, breakthrough DA in Year 1 is of low incidence (1.1-21.9%) but can occur, particularly in patients switching from anti-lymphocyte trafficking agents. In most patients, this DA did not lead to treatment discontinuation. Reported rates of DA after the full therapeutic effect of CladT has been achieved (end of Year 2, 3 or 4) range from 12.0 to 18.7% in the few studies identified. No RWE was identified to support management decisions for stable patients in Year 5 or later. Views among the group were also diverse on this question and voting on expert opinion statements was required. Only two studies reported the administration of additional courses of CladT, but detailed safety outcomes were not provided. RWE for the long-term use of CladT in the treatment of RMS is increasing, however, gaps in knowledge remain. Where possible, the RWE identified through the SLR informed expert statements, but, where RWE is still lacking, these were based solely on experiences and opinion, providing some guidance on topics and questions that occur in daily clinical practice. More real-world studies with longer-term follow-up periods are needed and highly anticipated.

Background: Cognitive deficits are common in multiple sclerosis (MS) and affect patients at all stages of the disease, regardless of phenotype. Aims: This literature review focuses the cognitive deficits observed in secondary progressive MS (SPMS). It is mainly based on studies that compared the frequency and main characteristics of cognitive deficits in SPMS with other phenotypes. Methods: A bibliographic search was carried out using the PubMed database with the following keywords: multiple sclerosis, secondary-progressive, cognition. Results: Thirteen studies were initially selected that were published in English, reporting the neuropsychological data of a sample of at least 30 patients with SPMS, comparing them with patients with other phenotypes. Studies suggest that there is an association between the duration of the disease and the frequency and extent of the cognitive disorders. Studies also showed that the SP form is associated with an increased frequency of cognitive impairment and with an increased severity as compared to relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Compared to RRMS, progressive forms of MS are associated with more severe impairment in certain cognitive areas, such as episodic verbal memory, information processing speed, working memory, or verbal fluency. Two studies showed that cognitive performances decline overtime in SPMS. Conclusion: Cognitive disorders are more frequent and more severe in the SP form than in relapsing course of MS. The profile of cognitive impairment encountered in the SP form also appears to be different from those found in the other phenotypes.