Lluís Brieva

Dr. Lluís Brieva


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2001 in Archives of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJérôme Honnorat
Jérôme Honnorat
ASAlbert Saiz
Albert Saiz
BGBruno Giometto
Bruno Giometto
AVAngela Vincent
Angela Vincent
LBLluís Brieva
Lluís Brieva
Francesc GrausFrancesc Graus
Francesc Graus
GLUTAMIC acid decarboxylase (GAD) is a major enzyme of the nervous system that catalyzes the conversion of glutamate to γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). This enzyme, also expressed by pancreatic beta cells, has been identified as a dominant and essential autoantigen in the development of insulin-dependent (type 1) diabetes mellitus (IDDM).1 Anti-GAD autoantibodies (GAD-Ab) are present in up to 80% of patients with newly diagnosed IDDM and can be detected many years before the clinical onset of the disease.2 High levels of GAD-Ab are found in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of at least 60% of patients with the stiff-man syndrome, a rare disorder of the central nervous system characterized by progressive muscle rigidity with superimposed painful spasms.3,4 Patients with stiff-man syndrome who have GAD-Ab usually also have IDDM and other organ-specific autoimmune manifestations, suggesting that the stiff-man syndrome may have an autoimmune-mediated pathogenesis.5 The GAD-Ab of patients with stiff-man syndrome are in higher titer and have a different epitope specificity than those of patients with IDDM, suggesting that the 2 diseases may have different autoimmune mechanisms.6,7

29 September 2009 in Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XMXavier Montalban
Xavier Montalban
JSJ. Sastre-Garriga
J. Sastre-Garriga
Mar TintoréMar Tintoré
Mar Tintoré
LBLluís Brieva
Lluís Brieva
FAFx Aymerich
Fx Aymerich
ÀRÀ. Rovira
À. Rovira
Inflammation and neurodegeneration may have differential impacts on disease evolution in the different forms of multiple sclerosis. However, a beneficial effect of immunomodulatory drugs should not be ruled out in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Our aim is to investigate the safety and efficacy of interferon beta-1b in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. We conducted a double-blind, stratified, randomized, parallel group, phase II pilot study where patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis or ‘transitional’ forms of multiple sclerosis received interferon beta-1b at doses of 8 MIU or placebo for 24 months. The main objective of the study was to investigate the safety and tolerability of interferon beta-1b. The primary efficacy variable was the time to neurological deterioration (Expanded Disability Status Scale) confirmed at 3 months. Seventy-three patients were included and three dropped out the study. More patients in the treatment arm had at least one related adverse event (94.4% versus 45.9%; p < 0.001); no other significant differences in safety endpoints were observed. Time to neurological deterioration was not different between trial arms (log-rank test, p = 0.3135). Statistically significant differences favoring treatment were observed for the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite score at several timepoints, T1 and T2 lesion volume changes at 12 and 24 months, mean number of active lesions and proportion of patients with active lesions at 24 months. We conclude that interferon beta-1b is safe and well tolerated in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis and transitional multiple sclerosis. Positive effects of interferon beta on secondary clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes were observed, but a beneficial effect on Expanded Disability Status Scale progression was not demonstrated.

6 October 2017 in Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMaria Sepúlveda
Maria Sepúlveda
MNMarta Aldea Novo
Marta Aldea Novo
DEDomingo Escudero
Domingo Escudero
SLSara Llufriu
Sara Llufriu
GAGeorgina Arrambide
Georgina Arrambide
ASAlbert Saiz
Albert Saiz
Background: Population-based studies on neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are limited, and it is unclear whether the rates have changed with the implementation of the new 2015 criteria. Objectives: To estimate the incidence and prevalence of NMOSD in Catalonia (Spain), using both the 2006 and the 2015 criteria. Methods: In this clinic-based retrospective study, patients diagnosed with NMOSD between 2006 and 2015 were identified using multiple sources, including direct contact to all Catalan hospitals, identification of cases through the Catalan Health Surveillance System, and registry of antibodies to aquaporin-4 (AQP4-IgG) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) in a reference laboratory. The incidence rate was calculated for the period 1 January 2006–1 January 2016 and prevalence for the date 1 January 2016. Results: We identified 74 patients (by the 2015 criteria). Most patients were Caucasian (81%), and female (76%) with a median age at disease onset of 42 years (range, 10–76 years). In total, 54 (73%) patients were positive for AQP4-IgG, 11 (15%) double-seronegative, and 9 (12%) MOG-IgG-positive. Rates of incidence and prevalence (0.63/1,000,000 person-years and 0.89/100,000, respectively) were 1.5-fold higher than those reported by the 2006 criteria. Lowest rates were seen in children and elder people and highest in women and middle-aged people (40–59 years). The female predominance was lost in incident AQP4-IgG-seronegative children and AQP4-IgG-positive elder people. MOG-IgG and double-seronegativity contributed similarly but did not influence the long-term outcome. Conclusion: The new criteria increase the estimates, but NMOSD remains as a rare disease. The differences in age- and sex-specific estimates highlight the importance of the serologic classification.

28 September 2012 in Journal of Neurochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HGHugo Gonzalo
Hugo Gonzalo
LBLluís Brieva
Lluís Brieva
FTFranz Tatzber
Franz Tatzber
MFMariona Jove Font
Mariona Jove Font
DCDaniel Cacabelos
Daniel Cacabelos
MPManuel Portero-Otin
Manuel Portero-Otin

21 February 2022 in Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PVPatrick Vermersch
Patrick Vermersch
LBLluís Brieva
Lluís Brieva
RFRobert J. Fox
Robert J. Fox
Friedemann PaulFriedemann Paul
Friedemann Paul
LRLluís Ramió-Torrentà
Lluís Ramió-Torrentà
OGon behalf of the AB07002 Study Group
on behalf of the AB07002 Study Group
Background and Objectives Masitinib is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, targeting innate immune cells (mast cells and microglia) that are involved in the pathophysiology of progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Study AB07002 assessed oral masitinib in patients with progressive MS who were progressing but not clinically active. Methods This randomized, double-blind, 2 parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial assessing 2 dose levels of masitinib vs equivalent placebo was conducted at 116 hospital clinics and specialized MS centers in 20 countries. Randomization (2:1) with minimization was performed centrally using an automated system. Patients, physicians, and outcome assessors remained masked to treatment group allocation. Patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS) or nonactive secondary progressive MS (nSPMS) without relapse for ≥2 years, aged 18–75 years, with baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 2.0–6.0, and regardless of time from onset were treated for 96 weeks. The primary end point was overall EDSS change from baseline using repeated measures (generalized estimating equation, timeframe W12–W96, measured every 12 weeks), with positive values indicating increased clinical deterioration. Efficacy and safety were assessed in all randomly assigned and treated patients. Results A total of 611 patients were randomized; 301 in the masitinib 4.5 mg/kg/d parallel group and 310 in the uptitrated masitinib 6.0 mg/kg/d parallel group. Masitinib (4.5 mg/kg/d) (n = 199) showed significant benefit over placebo (n = 101) according to the primary end point, 0.001 vs 0.098, respectively, with a between-group difference of −0.097 (97% CI −0.192 to −0.002); p = 0.0256. Safety was consistent with masitinib9s known profile (diarrhea, nausea, rash, and hematologic events), with no elevated risk of infection. Efficacy results from the independent uptitrated masitinib 6.0 mg/kg/d parallel group were inconclusive, and no new safety signal was observed. Discussion Masitinib (4.5 mg/kg/d) can benefit people with PPMS and nSPMS. A confirmatory phase 3 study will be initiated to substantiate these data. Trial Registration Information The first participant was randomized to study AB07002 on August 25, 2011. The trial was registered with the European Clinical Trials Database (#EudraCT 2010-021219-17) on July 1, 2011 (clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2010-021219-17/ES) and with ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT01433497) on September 14, 2011 (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01433497). Classification of Evidence This study provides Class II evidence that masitinib 4.5 mg/kg/d decreased progression of disability, measured by the EDSS, in adults with PPMS or patients with nSPMS (with no exacerbations in the last 2 years).

4 March 2021 in Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JFJosé I. Fernández-Velasco
José I. Fernández-Velasco
JKJens Kuhle
Jens Kuhle
EMEnric Monreal
Enric Monreal
VMVirginia Meca-Lallana
Virginia Meca-Lallana
JMJOSE EUSTASIO MECA-LALLANA
JOSE EUSTASIO MECA-LALLANA
LVLuisa M. Villar
Luisa M. Villar
Objective To analyze the changes induced by ocrelizumab in blood immune cells of patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS). Methods In this multicenter prospective study including 53 patients with PPMS who initiated ocrelizumab treatment, we determined effector, memory, and regulatory cells by flow cytometry at baseline and after 6 months of therapy. Wilcoxon matched paired tests were used to assess differences between baseline and 6 months9 results. p Values were corrected using the Bonferroni test. Results Ocrelizumab reduced the numbers of naive and memory B cells (p < 0.0001) and those of B cells producing interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) (p < 0.0001 in all cases). By contrast, the proportions of plasmablasts and B cells producing GM-CSF and TNFα increased significantly, suggesting the need for treatment continuation. We also observed a decrease in CD20+ T-cell numbers (p < 0.0001) and percentages (p < 0.0001), and a clear remodeling of the T-cell compartment characterized by relative increases of the naive/effector ratios in CD4+ (p = 0.002) and CD8+ (p = 0.002) T cells and relative decreases of CD4+ (p = 0.03) and CD8+ (p = 0.004) T cells producing interferon-gamma. Total monocyte numbers increased (p = 0.002), but no changes were observed in those producing inflammatory cytokines. The immunologic variations were associated with a reduction of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels (p = 0.008). The reduction was observed in patients with Gd-enhanced lesions at baseline and in Gd− patients with baseline sNfL >10 pg/mL. Conclusions In PPMS, effector B-cell depletion changed T-cell response toward a low inflammatory profile, resulting in decreased sNfL levels.