The valorization of coffee waste has gained traction due to its potential to generate valuable products, lessen its impact on the environment, and promote sustainability. This review examines the diverse range of coffee waste, including pulp, husk, mucilage, and parchment from the upstream processing of green beans, as well as silverskin (coffee chaff) and spent coffee grounds (SCGs) generated during roasting and brewing. These materials are identified as valuable raw inputs for biorefineries pursuing a bio-circular economy. Recent research has yielded several viable applications for these by-products, categorized into four main areas: (1) agriculture, (2) biofuels and bioenergy, (3) biochemicals and biomaterials, and (4) food ingredients and nutraceuticals. Despite significant advancements in research, the industrial application of coffee waste remains limited. This review summarizes the global commercialization landscape, highlighting that SCGs are particularly advantageous for large-scale upcycling, with applications spanning agriculture, biofuels, and biochemicals. In contrast, coffee husk is primarily utilized in food ingredients and nutraceuticals. The review also addresses the challenges and constraints that must be overcome to facilitate successful commercialization.

Ethanol is a promising biofuel that can replace fossil fuel, mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and represent a renewable building block for biochemical production. Ethanol can be produced from various feedstocks. First-generation ethanol is mainly produced from sugar- and starch-containing feedstocks. For second-generation ethanol, lignocellulosic biomass is used as a feedstock. Typically, ethanol production contains four major steps, including the conversion of feedstock, fermentation, ethanol recovery, and ethanol storage. Each feedstock requires different procedures for its conversion to fermentable sugar. Lignocellulosic biomass requires extra pretreatment compared to sugar and starch feedstocks to disrupt the structure and improve enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency. Many pretreatment methods are available such as physical, chemical, physicochemical, and biological methods. However, the greatest concern regarding the pretreatment process is inhibitor formation, which might retard enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation. The main inhibitors are furan derivatives, aromatic compounds, and organic acids. Actions to minimize the effects of inhibitors, detoxification, changing fermentation strategies, and metabolic engineering can subsequently be conducted. In addition to the inhibitors from pretreatment, chemicals used during the pretreatment and fermentation of byproducts may remain in the final product if they are not removed by ethanol distillation and dehydration. Maintaining the quality of ethanol during storage is another concerning issue. Initial impurities of ethanol being stored and its nature, including hygroscopic, high oxygen and carbon dioxide solubility, influence chemical reactions during the storage period and change ethanol’s characteristics (e.g., water content, ethanol content, acidity, pH, and electrical conductivity). During ethanol storage periods, nitrogen blanketing and corrosion inhibitors can be applied to reduce the quality degradation rate, the selection of which depends on several factors, such as cost and storage duration. This review article sheds light on the techniques of control used in ethanol fuel production, and also includes specific guidelines to control ethanol quality during production and the storage period in order to preserve ethanol production from first-generation to second-generation feedstock. Finally, the understanding of impurity/inhibitor formation and controlled strategies is crucial. These need to be considered when driving higher ethanol blending mandates in the short term, utilizing ethanol as a renewable building block for chemicals, or adopting ethanol as a hydrogen carrier for the long-term future, as has been recommended.

The vinasse waste was effectively converted to nanoporous carbon (NPC) via hydrothermal carbonization with potassium hydroxide (KOH) activation. The nanoporous carbon (NPC) exhibited a maximum surface area of 1018 m²/g and it was utilized as a catalyst for the conversion of palm oil into green diesel fuel. The supported NPC catalyst was fabricated via a wet impregnation technique, where finely distributed iron phosphide (FeP) particles were cemented. The FeP/NPC catalyst was evaluated for its physicochemical characteristics using various techniques including X-ray diffraction (XRD), nitrogen sorption analyzer, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS) mapping. An investigation was conducted to examine the effects of different temperatures (ranging from 280 to 360 °C) on the conversion of palm oil through deoxygenation reactions. The FeP/NPC catalyst exhibited remarkable particle dispersion and surface area. At a reaction temperature of 340 °C, the FeP/NPC catalyst had the best selectivity for green diesel, reaching 68.5%. The finding implies that FeP catalysts, when supported, hold significant promise for converting triglycerides into renewable diesel fuel. Moreover, they provide the advantage of being more cost-effective than valuable metals, while demonstrating excellent catalytic efficiency in the production of biofuels. Furthermore, it has been shown that the FeP/NPC catalyst can be recycled by subjecting it to heat treatment to remove impurities and obtain reduction.