Peng Yu

Dr. Peng Yu

Department of Cariology and Endodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2017 in Operative Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PYPeng Yu
Peng Yu
AYAuj Yap
Auj Yap
XWXy Wang
Xy Wang
SUMMARY: This study evaluated the degree of conversion (DC) and polymerization shrinkage (PS) of contemporary bulk-fill resin-based composites (RBCs) including giomer materials. Two giomer bulk-fill (Beautifil Bulk Restorative [BBR], Beautifil Bulk Flowable [BBF]), two nongiomer bulk-fill (Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-fill [TNB], Smart Dentin Replacement [SDR]), and three conventional non–bulk-fill (Beautifil II [BT], Beautifil Flow Plus [BF], Tetric N-Ceram [TN]) RBCs were selected for the study. To evaluate the DC, disc-shaped specimens of 5-mm diameter and 2-mm, 4-mm, and 6-mm thickness were fabricated using customized Teflon molds. The molds were bulk filled with the various RBCs and cured for 20 seconds using a light-emitting diode curing light with an irradiance of 950 mW/cm2. The DC (n=3) was determined by attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy by computing the spectra of cured and uncured specimens. PS (n=3) was measured with the Acuvol volumetric shrinkage analyzer by calculating specimen volumes before and after light curing. The mean DC for the various materials ranged from 46.03% to 69.86%, 45.94% to 69.38%, and 30.65% to 67.85% for 2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm, respectively. For all depths, SDR had the highest DC. While no significant difference in DC was observed between depths of 2 mm and 4 mm for the bulk-fill RBCs, DC at 2 mm was significantly greater than 6 mm. For the conventional RBCs, DC at 2 mm was significantly higher than at 4 mm and 6 mm. Mean PS ranged from 1.48% to 4.26% for BBR and BF, respectively. The DC at 2 mm and PS of bulk-fill RBCs were lower than their conventional counterparts. At 4 mm, the DC of giomer bulk-fill RBCs was lower than that of nongiomer bulk-fill materials.

26 March 2021 in Journal of Dental Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LZLu Zhang
Lu Zhang
PYPeng Yu
Peng Yu
XWXiaoyan Wang
Xiaoyan Wang
There is limited literature on the polishability of new launched nanofilled and nanohybrid. The aim of this study is to evaluate the polishability of nanofilled and nanohybrid composites by measuring surface roughness and gloss values and explore the surface qualities of composite before and after polishing in vitro. One nanofilled resin composite, two nanohybrid resin composites and one microhybrid resin composite were selected. All specimens were light cured against celluloid matrix strips. Then surface roughness(Ra) and gloss(GU) values were tested as negative control. Specimens were roughened with a 600-grit silicon carbide paper for 30 s to serve as positive control and then polished with Sof-Lex polishing disk system. Mean Ra and GU values of each step were measured with a profilometer and a small-area glossmeter. The surface qualities were observed by scanning electron microscope. Ra values of polished surfaces were significantly higher than negative control and lower than positive control(P < 0.05). All materials showed no significant difference on Ra values after polishing(P > 0.05). GU values of polished surfaces were significantly lower than negative control and higher than positive control(P < 0.05). After polishing the microhybrid resin composite showed lower GU values than nanofilled and nanohybrid resin composite groups. The SEM images showed surface textures and irregularities were corresponded to the results of surface roughness and gloss. No significant differences were noted on surface roughness among nanofilled, nanohybrid, and microhybrid composites after polishing with Sof-Lex disc system. Microhybrid composite presented lower gloss values than nanofilled and nanohybrid resin composites.

23 December 2021 in Journal of Dental Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PYPeng Yu
Peng Yu
YXyongxiang xu
yongxiang xu
YLYu-Shu Liu
Yu-Shu Liu
Bulk-fill resin-based composites (RBCs) are a new class of restorative materials, and polymerization shrinkage (PS) is concerned due to their single increment up to 4 mm. The aim of this study was to evaluate the PS and shrinkage stress (SS) of bulk-fill RBCs in vitro. Three bulk-fill RBCs and three conventional non-bulk-fill RBCs were selected. The PS was determined with Acuvol volumetric shrinkage analyzer by calculating the specimen volume variation before and after light irradiation. The SS was investigated using universal testing machine method with a polymethyl methacrylate rod as a bonding substrate. The force generated during the polymerization process was detected by a load cell linked to a computer. SS was calculated by dividing the maximum stress force by the area of the rod. The mean PS of various RBCs ranged from 1.72% to 2.13%. All PS results of bulk-fill RBCs were comparable to their conventional counterparts. Sonicfill 2 (SF2) and Harmonize (HM) showed the lowest PS (p < 0.05; Tukey HSD test). Medians of SS results ranged from 0.55 MPa to 0.67 MPa. All SSs of bulk-fill RBCs were comparable to their conventional counterparts. SF2 showed significantly lower SS than Tetric N-Ceram (TN) and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill (TNB) (p < 0.0083; post hoc comparisons with Bonferroni adjustments). A moderate, positive correlation was observed between PS and SS with Pearson's correlation (r = 0.446, p = 0.013). Both PS and SS are material dependent. A moderate, positive correlation between PS and SS is found with new bulk-fill RBCs and their conventional counterparts.

15 December 2022 in Journal of Dental Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PYPeng Yu
Peng Yu
SYSu-Ming Yang
Su-Ming Yang
YXYong-Xiang Xu
Yong-Xiang Xu
XWXiaoyan Wang
Xiaoyan Wang
Few studies have focused on the influence of simulated toothbrush abrasion on the surface qualities of novel nanofilled and nanohybrid composites. The aim of the study was to evaluate the surface roughness and gloss values of resin-based composite (RBC) materials with various filler types before and after simulated toothbrush abrasion. One nanofilled (Filtek Z350 XT [FT3]), two nanohybrids (Harmonize [HM] and Clearfil Majesty [CM]) and one microhybrid (Filtek Z250 [FT2]) were evaluated. Twelve specimens of each material were made and polished with silicon carbide sandpapers. Initial surface roughness and gloss values were measured as negative controls. Then, all specimens were subjected to simulated toothbrush abrasion on a custom-made apparatus. After 2000, 4000 and 8000 cycles, the surface roughness and gloss values of all specimens were tested. One additional specimen from each group was selected for scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. For FT3, Ra and GU values did not significantly change until after 8000 cycles during the process of toothbrushing (P > 0.05). For HM, CM and FT2, the Ra and GU values significantly decreased after 4000 and 8000 cycles of toothbrush abrasion (P < 0.05). After 8000 cycles of toothbrush abrasion, FT3 presented the lowest surface roughness and highest gloss values of all materials (P < 0.05). SEM images showed that surface textures and irregularities corresponded to the results of surface roughness and gloss. Surface roughness and gloss after simulated toothbrush abrasion were material dependent. Nanofilled resin composite presented the lowest Ra values and highest GU values.

1 January 2024 in Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CWChen Wang
Chen Wang
JYJingyu Yang
Jingyu Yang
HLHongzhi Liu
Hongzhi Liu
PYPeng Yu
Peng Yu
XJXijun Jiang
Xijun Jiang
RLRuijun Liu
Ruijun Liu
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry (JOCPD) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal, which is currently indexed in SCIE, etc., aming to provide clinically relevant information to enable the practicing dentist to have access to the state of the art in pediatric dentistry.