Peter Češarek

Dr. Peter Češarek

Chair of Mechanics, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2012 in International Journal of Solids and Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Peter ČešarekPeter Češarek
Peter Češarek
MSM. Saje
M. Saje
DZDejan Zupan
Dejan Zupan

1 September 2013 in Finite Elements in Analysis and Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Peter ČešarekPeter Češarek
Peter Češarek
MSM. Saje
M. Saje
DZDejan Zupan
Dejan Zupan

1 January 2015 in Journal of Constructional Steel Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJ. Kolšek
J. Kolšek
Peter ČešarekPeter Češarek
Peter Češarek

12 February 2023 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Doron HekičDoron Hekič
Doron Hekič
AAAndrej Anžlin
Andrej Anžlin
MKMaja Kreslin
Maja Kreslin
Ales ŽNIDARIČAles ŽNIDARIČ
Ales ŽNIDARIČ
Peter ČešarekPeter Češarek
Peter Češarek
Finite element (FE) model updating of bridges is based on the measured modal parameters and less frequently on the measured structural response under a known load. Until recently, the FE model updating did not consider strain measurements from sensors installed for weighing vehicles with bridge weigh-in-motion (B-WIM) systems. A 50-year-old multi-span concrete highway viaduct, renovated between 2017 and 2019, was equipped with continuous monitoring system with over 200 sensors, and a B-WIM system. In the most heavily instrumented span, the maximum measured longitudinal strains induced by the full-speed calibration vehicle passages were compared with the modelled strains. Based on the sensitivity study results, three variables that affected its overall stiffness were updated: Young’s modulus adjustment factor of all structural elements, and two anchorage reduction factors that considered the interaction between the superstructure and non-structural elements. The analysis confirmed the importance of the initial manual FE model updating to correctly reflect the non-structural elements during the automatic nonlinear optimisation. It also demonstrated a successful use of pseudo-static B-WIM loading data during the model updating process and the potential to extend the proposed approach to using random B-WIM-weighed vehicles for FE model updating and long-term monitoring of structural parameters and load-dependent phenomena.

1 April 2017 in Computers & Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KPK. Pirmanšek
K. Pirmanšek
Peter ČešarekPeter Češarek
Peter Češarek
DZDejan Zupan
Dejan Zupan
MSM. Saje
M. Saje

22 January 2024 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMaja Kreslin
Maja Kreslin
Peter ČešarekPeter Češarek
Peter Češarek
Ales ŽNIDARIČAles ŽNIDARIČ
Ales ŽNIDARIČ
DKDarko Kokot
Darko Kokot
JKJan Kalin
Jan Kalin
RVRok Vezočnik
Rok Vezočnik
Uneven road surfaces are the primary source of excitation in the dynamic interaction between a bridge and a vehicle and can lead to errors in bridge weigh-in-motion (B-WIM) systems. In order to correctly reproduce this interaction in a numerical model of a bridge, it is essential to know the magnitude and location of the various roadway irregularities. This paper presents a methodology for measuring the 3D road surface using static terrestrial laser scanning and a numerical model for simulating vehicle passage over a bridge with a measured road surface. This model allows the evaluation of strain responses in the time domain at any bridge location considering different parameters such as vehicle type, lateral position and speed, road surface unevenness, bridge type, etc. Since the time domain strains are crucial for B-WIM algorithms, the proposed approach facilitates the analysis of the different factors affecting the B-WIM results. The first validation of the proposed methodology was carried out on a real bridge, where extensive measurements were performed using different sensors, including measurements of the road surface, the response of the bridge when crossed by a test vehicle and the dynamic properties of the bridge and vehicle. The comparison between the simulated and measured bridge response marks a promising step towards investigating the influence of unevenness on the results of B-WIM.