In this present work, the air-conditioning test performance of an ejector refrigerator-based air-conditioner (ERAC) was proposed. The ERAC was operated as the water chiller to produce the cooling load up to 4.5 kW. The chilled water temperature was later supplied to the fan-coil unit for producing the thermal comfort condition. The cooling water used to cool the condenser was achieved from the cooling tower which was operated under the hot and humid ambient. This is to demonstrate the feasibility of using the ERAC in real working conditions. The cooling load supplied to the air-conditioned space was applied by the air heater. The ERAC could efficiently be operated to produce the thermal comfort condition which was driven by the hot water temperature (T_hot) of 90–98 °C. The system performance could vary with the heat source temperatures, cooling load, primary nozzle, and air-conditioned space temperature. The optimal performance was determined when varying the T_hot, and, hence, the optimal T_hot was indicated. The optimal T_hot varied significantly with variations in the working condition. The test results demonstrated high potential to further using the ejector refrigeration system in the actual air conditioning application.

This paper proposes an energy, exergy, economic, and exergoeconomic (4E) analysis of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) enhanced by an ejector refrigeration system. The two systems are combined via an intercooler, where the unwanted heat is transferred to the ejector cooling loop. The major objective is to reduce the discharge pressure of the expander so that higher power is achieved. However, the combined system requires more equipment and energy input, and, hence, 4E analysis is an efficient tool for assessing the feasibility of it in practical use based on a comprehensive analysis. This study aims to provide a systematic 4E-based evaluation of an ORC integrated with an ejector cooling cycle under realistic tropical conditions. The innovation of this work lies in combining unified thermodynamic, economic, and exergoeconomic assessments to quantify both performance enhancement and cost interactions attributable to condenser-side cooling. The findings offer significant insights into the dominant thermal–economic trade-offs, identify key cost drivers within the ORC + ECC configuration, and highlight operating conditions that maximize the power output and minimize the electricity generation cost. These results contribute practical guidelines for improving the feasibility and deployment of ORC–ejector systems for low-grade heat recovery applications. A theoretical model is formulated to examine both energy and exergy performance indicators together with key economic metrics. Parametric investigations are conducted to investigate the effects of the intercooler temperature (16–22 °C) and generator temperature (70–85 °C) on overall system performance. It is found that the integration of an ejector cooling cycle (ORC + ECC) can significantly enhance the thermo-economic potential of waste heat power generation systems compared to a standard ORC, from both exergoeconomic and LCOE perspectives. The exergoeconomic analysis identified that, while the expander dominates the cost of the standard ORC, the condenser and cooling tower become critical components of the ORC + ECC due to their high exergy-destruction costs. At the system level, the LCOE results confirm that the ORC + ECC can achieve 37–38% lower electricity generation costs compared to the standard ORC.

In this study, the influence of grid distribution on CFD model of the primary nozzle and mixing chamber used in refrigeration application was primarily investigated. The only one geometry of primary nozzle and mixing chamber was modeled. The two different grid distributions, fine near-wall grid and regular grid with the identical total grid number, were simulated to investigate the flow phenomena inside the considered system. The appropriate boundary conditions and numerical methods were carefully employed. The simulated entrainment ratios obtained by two different grid arrangements were validated by comparing with the reliable experimental data. The results revealed that the Mach number distributions of these models were different. Further, the outlet total pressure predicted by fine near-wall grid was about 1.3% higher than that obtained by regular grid.