Sandra Avila

Prof. Sandra Avila

University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2011 in Pattern Recognition Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sandra AvilaSandra Avila
Sandra Avila
ALAna Paula Brandão Lopes
Ana Paula Brandão Lopes
ALAntonio da Luz
Antonio da Luz
AAArnaldo de Albuquerque Araújo
Arnaldo de Albuquerque Araújo

10 June 2023 in Medical Image Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZMZahra Mirikharaji
Zahra Mirikharaji
KAKumar Abhishek
Kumar Abhishek
ABAlceu Emanuel Bissoto
Alceu Emanuel Bissoto
Catarina BarataCatarina Barata
Catarina Barata
Sandra AvilaSandra Avila
Sandra Avila
GHGh Hamarneh
Gh Hamarneh

1 May 2013 in Computer Vision and Image Understanding
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sandra AvilaSandra Avila
Sandra Avila
NTNicolas Thome
Nicolas Thome
MCMatthieu Cord
Matthieu Cord
EVEduardo Valle
Eduardo Valle
AAArnaldo de A. Araújo
Arnaldo de A. Araújo

1 April 2017
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
AMAfonso Menegola
Afonso Menegola
MFMichel Fornaciali
Michel Fornaciali
RPRamon Pires
Ramon Pires
FBFlavia Vasques Bittencourt
Flavia Vasques Bittencourt
Sandra AvilaSandra Avila
Sandra Avila
EVEduardo Valle
Eduardo Valle
Knowledge transfer impacts the performance of deep learning - the state of the art for image classification tasks, including automated melanoma screening. Deep learning's greed for large amounts of training data poses a challenge for medical tasks, which we can alleviate by recycling knowledge from models trained on different tasks, in a scheme called transfer learning. Although much of the best art on automated melanoma screening employs some form of transfer learning, a systematic evaluation was missing. Here we investigate the presence of transfer, from which task the transfer is sourced, and the application of fine tuning (i.e., retraining of the deep learning model after transfer). We also test the impact of picking deeper (and more expensive) models. Our results favor deeper models, pretrained over ImageNet, with fine-tuning, reaching an AUC of 80.7% and 84.5% for the two skin-lesion datasets evaluated.

1 May 2019 in Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RPRamon Pires
Ramon Pires
Sandra AvilaSandra Avila
Sandra Avila
JWJacques Wainer
Jacques Wainer
EVEduardo Valle
Eduardo Valle
MAMichael D. Abramoff
Michael D. Abramoff
ARAnderson Rocha
Anderson Rocha

1 March 2017 in Neurocomputing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMauricio Perez
Mauricio Perez
Sandra AvilaSandra Avila
Sandra Avila
DMDaniel Moreira
Daniel Moreira
DMDaniel Moraes
Daniel Moraes
VTVanessa Testoni
Vanessa Testoni
ARAnderson Rocha
Anderson Rocha