Satyajit Kundu

Mr. Satyajit Kundu

School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 August 2020 in International Journal of Environmental Health Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HBHasan Al Banna
Hasan Al Banna
ASAbu Sayeed
Abu Sayeed
Satyajit KunduSatyajit Kundu
Satyajit Kundu
ECEnryka Christopher
Enryka Christopher
MHM. Tasdik Hasan
M. Tasdik Hasan
SKShafiqul Islam Khan
Shafiqul Islam Khan
The recent COVID-19 pandemic has imposed threats on both physical and mental health since its outbreak. This study aimed to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health among a representative sample of home-quarantined Bangladeshi adults. A cross-sectional design was used with an online survey completed by a convenience sample recruited via social media. A total of 1,427 respondents were recruited, and their mental health was assessed by the DASS-21 measure. The prevalence of anxiety symptoms and depressive symptoms was 33.7% and 57.9%, respectively, and 59.7% reported mild to extremely severe levels of stress. Perceptions that the pandemic disrupted life events, affected mental health, jobs, the economy and education, predictions of a worsening situation, and uncertainty of the health care system capacities were significantly associated with poor mental health outcomes. Multivariate logistic regressions showed that sociodemographic factors and perceptions of COVID-19 significantly predict mental health outcomes. These findings warrant the consideration of easily accessible low-intensity mental health interventions during and beyond this pandemic.

5 December 2024 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AMAli H Mokdad
Ali H Mokdad
CBCatherine Bisignano
Catherine Bisignano
JHJohnathan M Hsu
Johnathan M Hsu
HAHazim S Ababneh
Hazim S Ababneh
RARouzbeh Abbasgholizadeh
Rouzbeh Abbasgholizadeh
CMChristopher J L Murray
Christopher J L Murray
The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2021 provides a comprehensive assessment of health and risk factor trends at global, regional, national, and subnational levels. This study aims to examine the burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors in the USA and highlight the disparities in health outcomes across different states. GBD 2021 analysed trends in mortality, morbidity, and disability for 371 diseases and injuries and 88 risk factors in the USA between 1990 and 2021. We used several metrics to report sources of health and health loss related to specific diseases, injuries, and risk factors. GBD 2021 methods accounted for differences in data sources and biases. The analysis of levels and trends for causes and risk factors within the same computational framework enabled comparisons across states, years, age groups, and sex. GBD 2021 estimated years lived with disability (YLDs) and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs; the sum of years of life lost to premature mortality and YLDs) for 371 diseases and injuries, years of life lost (YLLs) and mortality for 288 causes of death, and life expectancy and healthy life expectancy (HALE). We provided estimates for 88 risk factors in relation to 155 health outcomes for 631 risk-outcome pairs and produced risk-specific estimates of summary exposure value, relative health risk, population attributable fraction, and risk-attributable burden measured in DALYs and deaths. Estimates were produced by sex (male and female), age (25 age groups from birth to ≥95 years), and year (annually between 1990 and 2021). 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) were generated for all final estimates as the 2·5th and 97·5th percentiles values of 500 draws (ie, 500 random samples from the estimate's distribution). Uncertainty was propagated at each step of the estimation process. We found disparities in health outcomes and risk factors across US states. Our analysis of GBD 2021 highlighted the relative decline in life expectancy and HALE compared with other countries, as well as the impact of COVID-19 during the first 2 years of the pandemic. We found a decline in the USA's ranking of life expectancy from 1990 to 2021: in 1990, the USA ranked 35th of 204 countries and territories for males and 19th for females, but dropped to 46th for males and 47th for females in 2021. When comparing life expectancy in the best-performing and worst-performing US states against all 203 other countries and territories (excluding the USA as a whole), Hawaii (the best-ranked state in 1990 and 2021) dropped from sixth-highest life expectancy in the world for males and fourth for females in 1990 to 28th for males and 22nd for females in 2021. The worst-ranked state in 2021 ranked 107th for males (Mississippi) and 99th for females (West Virginia). 14 US states lost life expectancy over the study period, with West Virginia experiencing the greatest loss (2·7 years between 1990 and 2021). HALE ranking declines were even greater; in 1990, the USA was ranked 42nd for males and 32nd for females but dropped to 69th for males and 76th for females in 2021. When comparing HALE in the best-performing and worst-performing US states against all 203 other countries and territories, Hawaii ranked 14th highest HALE for males and fifth for females in 1990, dropping to 39th for males and 34th for females in 2021. In 2021, West Virginia-the lowest-ranked state that year-ranked 141st for males and 137th for females. Nationally, age-standardised mortality rates declined between 1990 and 2021 for many leading causes of death, most notably for ischaemic heart disease (56·1% [95% UI 55·1-57·2] decline), lung cancer (41·9% [39·7-44·6]), and breast cancer (40·9% [38·7-43·7]). Over the same period, age-standardised mortality rates increased for other causes, particularly drug use disorders (878·0% [770·1-1015·5]), chronic kidney disease (158·3% [149·6-167·9]), and falls (89·7% [79·8-95·8]). We found substantial variation in mortality rates between states, with Hawaii having the lowest age-standardised mortality rate (433·2 per 100 000 [380·6-493·4]) in 2021 and Mississippi having the highest (867·5 per 100 000 [772·6-975·7]). Hawaii had the lowest age-standardised mortality rates throughout the study period, whereas Washington, DC, experienced the most improvement (a 40·7% decline [33·2-47·3]). Only six countries had age-standardised rates of YLDs higher than the USA in 2021: Afghanistan, Lesotho, Liberia, Mozambique, South Africa, and the Central African Republic, largely because the impact of musculoskeletal disorders, mental disorders, and substance use disorders on age-standardised disability rates in the USA is so large. At the state level, eight US states had higher age-standardised YLD rates than any country in the world: West Virginia, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, New Mexico, Ohio, Tennessee, and Arizona. Low back pain was the leading cause of YLDs in the USA in 1990 and 2021, although the age-standardised rate declined by 7·9% (1·8-13·0) from 1990. Depressive disorders (56·0% increase [48·2-64·3]) and drug use disorders (287·6% [247·9-329·8]) were the second-leading and third-leading causes of age-standardised YLDs in 2021. For females, mental health disorders had the highest age-standardised YLD rate, with an increase of 59·8% (50·6-68·5) between 1990 and 2021. Hawaii had the lowest age-standardised rates of YLDs for all sexes combined (12 085·3 per 100 000 [9090·8-15 557·1]), whereas West Virginia had the highest (14 832·9 per 100 000 [11 226·9-18 882·5]). At the national level, the leading GBD Level 2 risk factors for death for all sexes combined in 2021 were high systolic blood pressure, high fasting plasma glucose, and...

23 June 2020 in Toxin Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RPRam Proshad
Ram Proshad
SISaiful Islam
Saiful Islam
Tanmoy Roy TusherTanmoy Roy Tusher
Tanmoy Roy Tusher
DZDan Zhang
Dan Zhang
SKSujan Khadka
Sujan Khadka
Satyajit KunduSatyajit Kundu
Satyajit Kundu
Water quality is a big concern for the humankind as it is the most important natural resource. Water is polluted by increasing activities of population and the necessity to provide them with goods and services that use water as a vital resource. In this study, surface water samples were collected in the summer and the winter season from Rupsa river, Bangladesh, and pH, electrical conductivity (EC), Cr, Ni, Cu, As, Cd and Pb concentrations were analyzed to assess the metal toxicity, identify the possible sources and determine health risk from metals in water. During the the summer season, the mean concentrations of Cr, Pb, As, Cu, Ni and Cd were measured as 7.20 ± 0.613, 7.09 ± 0.904, 5.45 ± 0.441, 5.36 ± 0.471, 3.85 ± 0.694 and 0.975 ± 0.106 µg/L, respectively, whereas the concentrations were measured as 8.87 ± 0.756, 7.32 ± 0.93, 6.05 ± 0.490, 6.02 ± 0.529, 5.48 ± 0.986 and 1.38 ± 0.151 µg/L, respectively, during the the winter season. Source identification like correlation analysis, Principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis (CA) were applied to identify the source of toxic metals in water. Total heavy metal toxicity load and heavy metal evaluation index values were found to be higher than permissible value except for Cu. According to the ecological risk index classification, 85% of the total samples were found to pose moderate ecological risks, while the rest 15% were found to pose low ecological risks during both seasons. As showed high non-carcinogenic risk on the basis of single element via oral exposure. The hazard index value for oral exposure by male, female and children was found to be 4.17E + 00, 3.67E + 00 and 8.64E + 00, respectively; indicating that non-carcinogenic effects are obvious to occur. The carcinogenic risks of Ni and As due to regular exposure via oral and dermal contact pathways were higher than the standard value (>1.0E-04) which anticipated possible cancer risks to male, female and children in the study area.

15 December 2020 in Public Health Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Satyajit KunduSatyajit Kundu
Satyajit Kundu
MBMd. hasan Al Banna
Md. hasan Al Banna
ASAbu Sayeed
Abu Sayeed
MSMst. Sadia Sultana
Mst. Sadia Sultana
KBKeith Brazendale
Keith Brazendale
SKShafiqul Islam Khan
Shafiqul Islam Khan
Objectives: The study aimed to determine the associated factors of household food security (HFS) and household dietary diversity (HDD) during the COVID−19 pandemic in Bangladesh.Design: Both online survey and face-to-face interviews were employed in this cross-sectional study. The Household Food Security Scale and Household Dietary Diversity Score were used to access HFS and HDD, respectively. The HDD scores were derived from a 24-h recall of food intake from 12 groups.Setting: Bangladesh.Participants: A total sample of 1876 households were recruited.Results: The overall mean scores of HFS and HDD were 31·86 (sd 2·52) and 6·22 (sd 5·49), respectively. Being a rural resident, having no formal education, occupation of household head other than government job and low monthly income were potential determinants of lower HFS and HDD. Approximately 45 % and 61 % of Bangladeshi households did not get the same quantity and same type of food, respectively, as they got before the pandemic. Over 10 % of respondents reported that they lost their job or had to close their businesses, and income reduction was reported by over 70 % of household income earners during the COVID-19 pandemic, which in turn was negatively associated with HFS and HDD.Conclusion: Household socio-economic variables and COVID-19 effects on occupation and income are potential predictors of lower HFS and HDD scores. HFS and HDD deserve more attention during this pandemic particularly with reference to low-earning households and the households whose earning persons’ occupation has been negatively impacted during the COVID-19 pandemic.

28 August 2021 in Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMd. hasan Al Banna
Md. hasan Al Banna
TDTasnim Rahman Disu
Tasnim Rahman Disu
Satyajit KunduSatyajit Kundu
Satyajit Kundu
BABright Opoku Ahinkorah
Bright Opoku Ahinkorah
KBKeith Brazendale
Keith Brazendale
SKShafiqul Islam Khan
Shafiqul Islam Khan
Background: Food handlers can play a vital role into reducing foodborne diseases by adopting appropriate food handling and sanitation practices in working plants. This study aimed to assess the factors associated with food safety knowledge and practices among meat handlers who work at butcher shops in Bangladesh.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 300 meat handlers from January to March, 2021. Data were collected through in-person interviews using a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of three parts; socio-demographic characteristics, assessments of food safety knowledge, and food safety practices. A multiple logistic regression model was used to identify the factors associated with food safety knowledge and practices.Results: Only 20% [95% confidence interval, (CI) 15.7–24.7] and 16.3% (95% CI 12.3–20.7) of the respondents demonstrated good levels of food safety knowledge and practices, respectively. The factors associated with good levels of food safety knowledge were: having a higher secondary education [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 4.57, 95% CI 1.11–18.76], income above 25,000 BDT/month (AOR = 10.52, 95% CI 3.43–32.26), work experience of > 10 years (AOR = 9.31, 95% CI 1.92–45.09), ≥ 8 h per day of work (AOR = 6.14, 95% CI 2.69–13.10), employed on a daily basis (AOR = 4.05, 95% CI 1.16–14.14), and having food safety training (AOR = 8.98 95% CI 2.16–37.32). Good food safety knowledge (AOR = 5.68, 95% CI 2.33–13.87) and working ≥ 8 h per day (AOR = 8.44, 95% CI 3.11–22.91) were significantly associated with a good level of food safety practice.Conclusions: Poor knowledge and practices regarding food safety were found among Bangladeshi meat handlers. Findings may help public health professionals and practitioners develop targeted strategies to improve food safety knowledge and practices among this population. Such strategies may include education and sensitization on good food safety practices.

24 December 2020 in Psychiatria Danubina
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAbu Sayeed
Abu Sayeed
Satyajit KunduSatyajit Kundu
Satyajit Kundu
HBHasan Al Banna
Hasan Al Banna
ECEnryka Christopher
Enryka Christopher
MHM. Tasdik Hasan
M. Tasdik Hasan
SKShafiqul Islam Khan
Shafiqul Islam Khan
Individuals with certain pre-existing chronic health conditions have been identified as a high-risk group for fatalities of COVID-19. Therefore, it is likely that individuals with chronic diseases may worry during this pandemic to the detriment of their mental health. This study compares the mental health of Bangladeshi adults affected by chronic disease to a healthy, matched control group during the COVID-19 pandemic. A matched case-control analysis was performed with data collected from 395 respondents with chronic diseases and 395 controls matched for age, gender, and residence. Inclusion criteria for cases were respondents who self-reported having asthma, cardiovascular disease symptoms and/or diabetes. Respondents were recruited using an online survey, which included the DASS-21 measure to assess symptoms of stress, anxiety, and depression. Chi-square test, t-test, Fisher's exact test and a conditional logistic regression were performed to examine associations among variables. The prevalence of anxiety symptoms and depression symptoms and the level of stress were significantly higher among cases (59%; 71.6%; 73.7%, respectively) than among controls (25.6%; 31.1%; 43.3%, respectively). Chi-square and t-test showed significant associations and differences between having chronic diseases and mental health outcomes. A conditional logistic regression showed that respondents with asthma, diabetes, cardiovascular disease symptoms, or any combination of these diseases had higher odds of exhibiting symptoms of stress, anxiety, and depression than healthy individuals. These results underscore a subpopulation vulnerable to mental health consequences during this pandemic and indicate the need for additional mental health resources to be available to those with chronic diseases.