Shernan Holtan

Prof. Shernan Holtan

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 August 2014 in American Journal of Reproductive Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EEElizabeth Ann L. Enninga
Elizabeth Ann L. Enninga
WNWendy K. Nevala
Wendy K. Nevala
DCDouglas J. Creedon
Douglas J. Creedon
SMSvetomir N. Markovic
Svetomir N. Markovic
Shernan HoltanShernan Holtan
Shernan Holtan
Problem: Several pregnancy complications have disparities based on the sex of the fetus. It is unknown whether the sex of the fetus differentially alters the maternal immune milieu, potentially contributing to the observed differences.Method of study: Using maternal plasma collected during 38 uncomplicated pregnancies (19 males, 19 females), we compared levels of cytokines, sex hormones, and angiogenic factors throughout gestation and postpartum.Results: Male fetal sex was associated with higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines (G‐CSF, IL‐12p70, IL‐21, and IL‐33) and angiogenic factors (PlGF and VEGF‐A) compared with female fetal sex at multiple timepoints. Female fetal sex was associated with higher levels of regulatory cytokines (IL‐5, IL‐9, IL‐17, and IL‐25). IL‐27 increased throughout pregnancy regardless of fetal sex. There was no fetal sex‐based difference in analyte concentrations at the postpartum measurement.Conclusion: Women carrying a male fetus exhibit a more proinflammatory/proangiogenic immune milieu than women carrying a female fetus.

18 February 2019 in Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EBElizabeth Buchbinder
Elizabeth Buchbinder
JDJanice P. Dutcher
Janice P. Dutcher
GDGregory A. Daniels
Gregory A. Daniels
BCBrendan D. Curti
Brendan D. Curti
SPSapna Patel
Sapna Patel
DMDavid F. McDermott
David F. McDermott
Background Metastatic melanoma (mM) and renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are often treated with anti-PD-1 based therapy, however not all patients respond and further therapies are needed. High dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) can lead to durable responses in a subset of mM and mRCC patients. The efficacy and toxicity of HD IL-2 therapy following anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 therapy have not yet been explored. Methods Reports on mM and mRCC patients who had received HD IL-2 after PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibition were queried from the PROCLAIMSM database. Patient characteristics, toxicity and efficacy were analyzed. Results A total of 57 patients (40 mM, 17 mRCC) were treated with high dose IL-2 after PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibition and had data recorded in the PROCLAIM database. The best overall response rate to HD IL-2 was 22.5% for mM (4 complete response (CR), 5 partial responses (PRs)) and 24% for mRCC (2 CRs, 2 PRs). The toxicity related to HD IL-2 observed in these patients was similar to that observed in patients treated with HD IL-2 without prior checkpoint blockade. One patient who had received prior PD-L1 blockade developed drug induced pneumonitis with HD IL-2 requiring steroid therapy. Conclusion In this retrospective analysis, HD IL-2 therapy displayed durable antitumor activity in mM and mRCC patients who progressed following treatment with PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibition. The toxicities were generally manageable and consistent with expectations from HD IL-2 but physicians should watch for immune related toxicities such as pneumonitis. This analysis supports the development of randomized prospective trials to assess the proper sequencing and combination of immune checkpoint blockade and cytokine therapy.

9 January 2020 in Blood
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJoseph Pidala
Joseph Pidala
MHMehdi Hamadani
Mehdi Hamadani
PDPeter Dawson
Peter Dawson
MMMichael Martens
Michael Martens
AAAmin M. Alousi
Amin M. Alousi
MMMargaret L. MacMillan
Margaret L. MacMillan
Clinical- and biomarker-based tools may identify a lower-risk acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) population amenable to novel, reduced-intensity treatments. Previous data suggest sirolimus may rival standard of care prednisone. We conducted a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/National Cancer Institute-funded Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 2 trial to estimate the difference in day 28 complete response (CR)/partial response (PR) rates for sirolimus vs prednisone as initial treatment of patients with standard risk (SR) acute GVHD as defined by the Minnesota (MN) GVHD Risk Score and Ann Arbor (AA1/2) biomarker status. A total of 127 MN-SR patients were randomized (1:1), and 122 were AA1/2 (sirolimus, n = 58; prednisone, n = 64). Others were AA3 (n = 4), or AA status missing (n = 1). The day 28 CR/PR rates were similar for sirolimus 64.8% (90% confidence interval [CI], 54.1%-75.5%) vs 73% (90% CI, 63.8%-82.2%) for prednisone. The day 28 rate of CR/PR with prednisone ≤0.25 mg/kg/day was significantly higher for sirolimus than prednisone (66.7% vs 31.7%; P < .001). No differences were detected in steroid-refractory acute GVHD, disease-free survival, relapse, nonrelapse mortality, or overall survival. Sirolimus was associated with reduced steroid exposure and hyperglycemia, reduced grade 2 to 3 infections, improvement in immune suppression discontinuation and patient-reported quality of life, and increased risk for thrombotic microangiopathy. For patients with clinical- and biomarker-based SR acute GVHD, sirolimus demonstrates similar overall initial treatment efficacy as prednisone. In addition, sirolimus therapy spares steroid exposure and allied toxicity, does not compromise long-term survival outcomes, and is associated with improved patient-reported quality of life. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02806947.

1 December 2023 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARArmin Rashidi
Armin Rashidi
MEMaryam Ebadi
Maryam Ebadi
TRTauseef Ur Rehman
Tauseef Ur Rehman
HEHeba Elhusseini
Heba Elhusseini
DKDavid Kazadi
David Kazadi
Christopher StaleyChristopher Staley
Christopher Staley
PURPOSE: Gut microbiota injury in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients and patients with AML has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Previous studies in these patients have shown improvements in various microbiome indices after fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). However, whether microbiome improvements translate into improved clinical outcomes remains unclear. We examined this question in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial. METHODS: Two independent cohorts of allogeneic HCT recipients and patients with AML receiving induction chemotherapy were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive standardized oral encapsulated FMT versus placebo upon neutrophil recovery. After each course of antibacterial antibiotics, patients received a study treatment. Up to three treatments were administered within 3 months. The primary end point was 4-month all-cause infection rate. Patients were followed for 9 months. RESULTS: In the HCT cohort (74 patients), 4-month infection density was 0.74 and 0.91 events per 100 patient-days in FMT and placebo arms, respectively (infection rate ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.42; P = .49). In the AML cohort (26 patients), 4-month infection density was 0.93 in the FMT arm and 1.25 in the placebo arm, with an infection rate ratio of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.32 to 1.71; P = .48). Unique donor bacterial sequences comprised 25%-30% of the fecal microbiota after FMT. FMT improved postantibiotic recovery of microbiota diversity, restored several depleted obligate anaerobic commensals, and reduced the abundance of expanded genera Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Veillonella, and Dialister. CONCLUSION: In allogeneic HCT recipients and patients with AML, third-party FMT was safe and ameliorated intestinal dysbiosis, but did not decrease infections. Novel findings from this trial will inform future development of FMT trials.

1 January 2016 in Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ALAleksandr Lazaryan
Aleksandr Lazaryan
DWDaniel J. Weisdorf
Daniel J. Weisdorf
TDTodd DeFor
Todd DeFor
CBClaudio G. Brunstein
Claudio G. Brunstein
MMMargaret L. MacMillan
Margaret L. MacMillan
MAMukta Arora
Mukta Arora
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is often complicated by graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We analyzed the incidences and risk factors for acute (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD), and their impact on disease relapse and survival, among recipients of single umbilical cord blood (sUCB, n = 295), double umbilical cord blood (dUCB, n = 416), and matched sibling donor (MSD, n = 469) allografts. The incidences of grades II to IV aGVHD and chronic GVHD among dUCB, sUCB, and MSD were 56% and 26%, 26% and 7%, 37% and 40%, respectively. Development of aGVHD had no effect on relapse, nonrelapse mortality, or overall survival among cord blood recipients, but it was associated with worse nonrelapse mortality and survival in MSD recipients. Development of cGVHD was only associated with lower relapse in dUCBT. In multivariate analysis of GVHD incidence, age > 18 years was associated with higher incidence of aGVHD and cGVHD across all cohorts. In both UCB cohorts worse HLA match and prior aGVHD were associated with higher risks of aGVHD and cGVHD, respectively. Nonmyeloablative conditioning limited the risk of aGVHD compared with myeloablative conditioning in dUCB recipients. Cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil as GVHD prophylaxis lowered the risk of cGVHD, compared with steroids with cyclosporine A, among sUCB recipients. This large contemporary analysis suggests distiinct risks and consequences of GVHD for UCB and MSD recipients. Limiting the severity of aGVHD remains important in all groups. Increasing the cord blood inventory or developing strategies that reduce the cell-dose threshold and thereby increase the chance of identifying an adequately dosed, better HLA-matched sUCB unit may further limit risks of aGVHD after UCB transplantation.

5 March 2021 in Blood Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMargaret L. MacMillan
Margaret L. MacMillan
KHKeli L. Hippen
Keli L. Hippen
DMDavid H. McKenna
David H. McKenna
DKDiane Kadidlo
Diane Kadidlo
DSDarin Sumstad
Darin Sumstad
BBBruce R. Blazar
Bruce R. Blazar
Human CD4+25− T cells cultured in interleukin 2 (IL-2), rapamycin, and transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) along with anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody–loaded artificial antigen-presenting cells generate FoxP3+ induced regulatory T cells (iTregs) with potent suppressive function. We performed a phase 1, single-center, dose-escalation study to determine the safety profile of iTregs in adults with high-risk malignancy treated with reduced-intensity conditioning and mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) from HLA-identical sibling donors. Sixteen patients were enrolled and 14 were treated (2 productions failed to meet desired doses). One patient each received 3.0 × 106/kg, 3.0 × 107/kg, and 3.0 × 108/kg iTregs with corresponding T-conventional-to-iTreg ratios of 86:1, 8:1, and 1:2. After 3 patients received 3.0 × 108/kg in the presence of cyclosporine (CSA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with no dose-limiting toxicities, subsequent patients were to receive iTregs in the presence of sirolimus/MMF that favors Foxp3 stability based on preclinical modeling. However, 2 of 2 developed grade 3 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), resulting in suspension of the sirolimus/MMF. An additional 7 patients received 3.0 × 108/kg iTregs with CSA/MMF. In the 14 patients treated with iTregs and CSA/MMF, there were no severe infusional toxicities with all achieving neutrophil recovery (median, day 13). Of 10 patients who received 3.0 × 108/kg iTregs and CSA/MMF, 7 had no aGVHD, 2 had grade 2, and 1 had grade 3. Circulating Foxp3+ iTregs were detectable through day 14. In summary, iTregs in the context of CSA/MMF can be delivered safely at doses as high as 3 × 108/kg. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01634217.