Shervan Babamohammadi

Dr. Shervan Babamohammadi

Chemical Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2015 in Reviews in Chemical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Shervan BabamohammadiShervan Babamohammadi
Shervan Babamohammadi
ASAhmad Shamiri
Ahmad Shamiri
MAMohamed Kheireddine Ben Taeib Aroua
Mohamed Kheireddine Ben Taeib Aroua
Concern has increased about climate change caused by carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions through human activities in recent years. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts a 1.9°C rise in temperature by the year 2100, and this means a reduction in CO2 is vital for human beings and all other life on earth. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the development of CO2 separation processes to mitigate this potential problem. Post-combustion power plants can employ various types of separation technology. Among them, chemical absorption using aqueous amine is more developed and more reliable. The conventional solvents used in the chemical absorption process together with the use of absorbents, ionic liquid, alkanolamines and their blended aqueous solutions are reviewed in this work. Different ionic liquid-based solvents for CO2 absorption and the most effective parameters on mass transfer phenomena between CO2 and solvent are reviewed. The major concerns for this technology, including the physiochemical properties of ionic liquid-based solvents, Henry’s constant and mass transfer coefficient and their correlations, and various factors for effective CO2 absorption, are addressed.

1 January 2018 in Journal of Molecular Liquids
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Shervan BabamohammadiShervan Babamohammadi
Shervan Babamohammadi
ASAhmad Shamiri
Ahmad Shamiri
Tohid N.BorhaniTohid N.Borhani
Tohid N.Borhani
MSMohammad Saleh Shafeeyan
Mohammad Saleh Shafeeyan
MAMohamed Kheireddine Ben Taeib Aroua
Mohamed Kheireddine Ben Taeib Aroua
RYRozita Yusoff
Rozita Yusoff

7 September 2023 in Gas Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WDWilliam George Davies
William George Davies
Shervan BabamohammadiShervan Babamohammadi
Shervan Babamohammadi
YYYang Yang
Yang Yang
SSSalman Masoudi Soltani
Salman Masoudi Soltani

14 July 2023 in Gas Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Shervan BabamohammadiShervan Babamohammadi
Shervan Babamohammadi
WDWilliam George Davies
William George Davies
SSSalman Masoudi Soltani
Salman Masoudi Soltani

1 February 2025 in Gas Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Tohid N.BorhaniTohid N.Borhani
Tohid N.Borhani
MAMeisam Ansarpour
Meisam Ansarpour
Shervan BabamohammadiShervan Babamohammadi
Shervan Babamohammadi
EOEni Oko
Eni Oko

20 August 2025 in Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WDWilliam George Davies
William George Davies
Shervan BabamohammadiShervan Babamohammadi
Shervan Babamohammadi
IGIlies Galloro
Ilies Galloro
MGMikhail Gorbounov
Mikhail Gorbounov
FCFrancesco Coletti
Francesco Coletti
Salman Masoudi SoltaniSalman Masoudi Soltani
Salman Masoudi Soltani
Blue hydrogen is a promising low-carbon alternative to conventional fossil fuels. This technology has been garnering increasing attention with many technological advances in recent years, with a particular focus on the deployed materials and process configurations aimed at minimising the cost and CO2 emissions intensity of the process as well as maximising efficiency. However, less attention is given to the practical aspects of large-scale deployment, with the cooling requirements often being overlooked, especially across multiple locations. In particular, the literature tends to focus on CO2 emissions intensity of blue hydrogen production processes, with other environmental impacts such as water and electrical consumption mostly considered an afterthought. Notably, there is a gap to understand the impact of cooling methods on such environmental metrics, especially with technologies at a lower technology readiness level. Herein, two cooling methods (namely, air-cooling versus water-cooling) have been assessed and cross-compared in terms of their energy impact alongside techno-economics, considering deployment across two specific locations (United Kingdom and Saudi Arabia). A sorption-enhanced steam-methane reforming (SE-SMR) coupled with chemical-looping combustion (CLC) was used as the base process. Deployment of this process in the UK yielded a levelised cost of hydrogen (LCOH) of GBP 2.94/kg H2 with no significant difference between the prices when using air-cooling and water-cooling, despite the air-cooling approach having a higher electricity consumption. In Saudi Arabia, this process achieved a LCOH of GBP 0.70 and GBP 0.72 /kg H2 when using air- and water-cooling, respectively, highlighting that in particularly arid regions, air-cooling is a viable approach despite its increased electrical consumption. Furthermore, based on the economic and process performance of the SE-SMR-CLC process, the policy mechanisms and financial incentives that can be implemented have been discussed to further highlight what is required from key stakeholders to ensure effective deployment of blue hydrogen production.