Tatiana A. Pires de Almeida

Ms. Tatiana A. Pires de Almeida

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 September 2024 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Felipe NavecaFelipe Naveca
Felipe Naveca
Tatiana A. Pires de AlmeidaTatiana A. Pires de Almeida
Tatiana A. Pires de Almeida
VSVictor Souza
Victor Souza
VNValdinete Nascimento
Valdinete Nascimento
DSDejanane Silva
Dejanane Silva
GBGonzalo Bello
Gonzalo Bello

14 May 2018 in Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Felipe NavecaFelipe Naveca
Felipe Naveca
GPgemilson pontes
gemilson pontes
ACAileen Yu-Hen Chang
Aileen Yu-Hen Chang
GSGeorge Allan Villarouco da Silva
George Allan Villarouco da Silva
VNValdinete Alves Do Nascimento
Valdinete Alves Do Nascimento
RRRajendranath Ramasawmy
Rajendranath Ramasawmy
Key words Zika virus; CXCL10; biomarkers; chemokines; cytokines

1 August 2013 in Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FRFernanda Borowsky da Rosa
Fernanda Borowsky da Rosa
VSVictor Costa de Souza
Victor Costa de Souza
Tatiana A. Pires de AlmeidaTatiana A. Pires de Almeida
Tatiana A. Pires de Almeida
VNValdinete Alves Do Nascimento
Valdinete Alves Do Nascimento
FVFelicien Gonçalves Vásquez
Felicien Gonçalves Vásquez
Felipe NavecaFelipe Naveca
Felipe Naveca
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), international efforts to control leprosy have resulted in remarkable advances, most notably in a reduction in the number of cases in endemic countries. In spite of this, Brazil (16%), India (58%) and Indonesia (9%) contributed 83% of the new cases detected in 2011 (WHO 2012). Although Brazil has registered a decrease in new cases, leprosy is still a public health concern for the country. In 2011, 33,955 new cases of leprosy were detected in Brazil (WHO 2012), 586 of which were in the state of Amazonas (AM) (FUAM 2011).

20 May 2015 in Parasites & Vectors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJansen Fernandes De Medeiros
Jansen Fernandes De Medeiros
Tatiana A. Pires de AlmeidaTatiana A. Pires de Almeida
Tatiana A. Pires de Almeida
LSLucyane Bastos Tavares Silva
Lucyane Bastos Tavares Silva
JRJose Miguel Rubio
Jose Miguel Rubio
James Lee CraineyJames Lee Crainey
James Lee Crainey
SLSergio Luiz Bessa Luz
Sergio Luiz Bessa Luz
Mansonella ozzardi is a poorly understood human filarial parasite with a broad distribution throughout Latin America. Most of what is known about its parasitism has come from epidemiological studies that have estimated parasite incidence using light microscopy. Light microscopy can, however, miss lighter, submicroscopic, infections. In this study we have compared M. ozzardi incidence estimates made using light microscopy, with estimates made using PCR. 214 DNA extracts made from Large Volume Venous Blood Samples (LVVBS) were taken from volunteers from two study sites in the Rio Solimões region: Codajás [n = 109] and Tefé [n = 105] and were subsequently assayed for M. ozzardi parasitism using a diagnostic PCR (Mo-dPCR). Peripheral finger-prick blood samples were taken from the same individuals and used for microscopic examination. Finger-prick blood, taken from individuals from Tefé, was also used for the creation of FTA®card dried blood spots (DBS) that were subsequently subjected to Mo-dPCR. Overall M. ozzardi incidence estimates made with LVVBS PCRs were 1.8 times higher than those made using microscopy (44.9 % [96/214] compared with 24.3 % [52/214]) and 1.5 times higher than the PCR estimates made from FTA®card DBS (48/105 versus 31/105). PCR-based detection of FTA®card DBS proved 1.3 times more sensitive at diagnosing infections from peripheral blood samples than light microscopy did: detecting 24/105 compared with 31/105. PCR of LVVBS reported the fewest number of false negatives, detecting: 44 of 52 (84.6 %) individuals diagnosed by microscopy; 27 of 31 (87.1 %) of those diagnosed positive from DBSs and 17 out of 18 (94.4 %) of those diagnosed as positive by both alternative methodologies. In this study, Mo-dPCR of LVVBS was by far the most sensitive method of detecting M. ozzardi infections and detected submicroscopic infections. Mo-dPCR FTA®card DBS also provided a more sensitive test for M. ozzardi diagnosis than light microscopy based diagnosis did and thus in settings where only finger-prick assays can be carried-out, it may be a more reliable method of detection. Most existing M. ozzardi incidence estimates, which are often based on light microscope diagnosis, are likely to dramatically underestimate true M. ozzardi parasitism incidence levels.

21 May 2013 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Felipe NavecaFelipe Naveca
Felipe Naveca
MSMeritxell Sabido
Meritxell Sabido
Tatiana A. Pires de AlmeidaTatiana A. Pires de Almeida
Tatiana A. Pires de Almeida
EVElaine Araújo Veras
Elaine Araújo Veras
MMMatilde del Carmen Contreras Mejía
Matilde del Carmen Contreras Mejía
ABAdele Schwartz Benzaken
Adele Schwartz Benzaken
Objectives To determine the etiology and factors associated with genital ulcer disease (GUD) among patients presenting to a sexually transmitted infections clinic in Manaus, Brazil; and to compare a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) assay for the diagnosis of GUD with standard methods. Methods Ulcer swabs were collected and used for Tzanck test and processed in an M-PCR to detect herpes simplex virus (HSV-1/2), Treponema pallidum (T. pallidum) , and Haemophilus ducreyi (H. ducreyi) . Sera were tested for HIV and syphilis antibodies. Multivariable analysis was used to measure the association between clinical aspects and GUD. M-PCR results were compared with syphilis serology and Tzanck tests. Results Overall, 434 GUD samples were evaluated, 84.8% from men. DNA from HSV-2 was detected in 55.3% of GUD samples, T. pallidum in 8.3%, HSV-1 in 3.2%, and 32.5% of GUD specimens were negative for the DNA of all three pathogens. No cases of H. ducreyi were identified. HIV serology among GUD patients was 3.2%. Treponemal antibodies and Tzanck test positivity for genital herpes was detected in 25 (5.8%) and in 125 (30.3%) of GUD patients, respectively. In multivariable analysis genital herpes etiology by M-PCR was associated with the vesicular, multiple and recurrent lesions whereas T. pallidum with non-vesicular, non-recurrent lesions. Compared to M-PCR, syphilis serology was 27.8% sensitive and 96.2% specific whereas Tzanck test was 43.8% sensitive and 88.9% specific. Conclusions The predominance of genital herpes etiology suggests a revision of existing national syndromic treatment guidelines in Brazil to include antiherpetic treatment for all GUD patients. The use of M-PCR can significantly improve the diagnosis of GUD and provide a greater sensitivity than standard diagnostics.

7 September 2016 in The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TTThuy-Huong Ta-Tang
Thuy-Huong Ta-Tang
SLSergio L. B. Luz
Sergio L. B. Luz
FMFrancisco J. Merino
Francisco J. Merino
IFIsabel de Fuentes
Isabel de Fuentes
RLRogelio López-Vélez
Rogelio López-Vélez
JRJose Miguel Rubio
Jose Miguel Rubio
Mansonellosis is endemic in several regions of Africa, the Caribbean, and Latin America. Mansonella ozzardi and Mansonella perstans have been reported in Latin America, including the Amazon region. A morphological and molecular microfilariae study was performed in Pauini (Brazil). Blood samples were collected from 40 individuals, and were analyzed by Giemsa-stained blood film and by two different nested polymerase chain reactions which detect internal transcribed spacer-1 and the major sperm protein gene. By microscopy, 14 of 40 were positive: 11 as M. ozzardi and three as M. perstans–like infections. Both molecular methods detected 19 positive cases as M. ozzardi, including those 14 individuals detected by microscopy, without detectable genetic differences among any of the 19 positive samples. Molecular techniques showed an improvement of mansonellosis diagnosis and may become an effective tool to evaluate the present status of M. ozzardi and M. perstans in Latin America.